Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │Issue 7 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.833773 STUDENT TEACHERS’ PROGRESS IN TEACHING PRACTICE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF MASTER TEACHERS Lalith Ranjan Gonsalkoralai Senior Lecture, Department of Secondary & Tertiary Education, Faculty of Education, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka Abstract: One of the most popular teacher training programmes of study conducted by The Faculty of Education of the Open University of Sri Lanka is the Post Graduate Diploma in Education (PGDE) Programme. One of the aims of this programme is to upgrade student teachers’ theoretical knowledge and practical skills with regard to the Teaching – Learning process. Teaching practice is the most important component of the PGDE programme which is conducted in two stages. The first stage is conducted in the student teachers’ schools itself, which has a duration of weeks. During this period, the student teacher has to write 100 lesson plans and teach 100 periods. A Master Teacher (MT) appointed and trained by the department, visits the student teachers’ school five times during this period to supervise and evaluate five lessons. The department always strives to improve the quality of teaching practice, through various strategies. The analysis of master teachers’ evaluation reports on student teachers’ progress is one of them. The stage II of the teaching practice component is the final evaluation and is conducted at a school selected by the University and is evaluated by a different examiner. The main aim of this study is to investigate student teachers’ performance during teaching practice stage I, according to the perceptions of master teachers. This paper deals specifically with the progress of lesson plan writing and classroom management. The sample of the study consisted of 400 student teachers. The data collection instruments were the two evaluation reports completed by the MTs. The findings of the study revealed that the student teachers’ writing of lesson plans and classroom management have improved according to the MTs’ perception. The need to provide proper and timely instructions to student teachers and to further develop the MTs’ training capacities also came to light. Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 659 Lalith Ranjan Gonsalkorala STUDENT TEACHERS’ PROGRESS IN TEACHING PRACTICE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF MASTER TEACHERS Keywords: PGDE teaching practice, master teachers, lesson plan writing, classroom management progress 1. Introduction The Post Graduate Diploma in Education (PGDE) Programme is one of the major teacher training programmes offered by the Faculty of Education of the Open University of Sri Lanka. The aim of the programme is to create a competent teacher who can work for the maximum benefit of the school and its students with positive attitudes. The Teaching Practice (TP) is a major component of the programme and it is conducted in two stages. The stage I, with duration of 10 weeks, is conducted in the student teachers’ own schools. During this period, a student teacher has to write 100 lesson plans and teach 100 periods. Master Teachers (MTs) who are appointed and trained by the department, visit the student teachers’ schools five times to supervise and evaluate five lessons. During stage 1, student teachers are supposed to improve their teaching skills under the guidance of MTs who play a major role in that regard. However, the department has experienced many short comings in this process over the years arising from both student teachers and MTs. The department always tries to improve the quality of teaching practice, through various strategies. One is the use of MTs’ evaluation reports on TP. This study focuses on student teachers’ performance during TP stage I, according to the perceptions of MTs. For downloading the full article, please access the following link: http://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/909 European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 660