Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science ISSN: 2501 - 1235 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1235 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │ Issue 11 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.996465 COMPARISON OF FLEXIBILITY AND BALANCE PARAMETERS BETWEEN THE SPORT BRANCHES OF THE GIRLS AT THE FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCES R. Nazım Saraçoğlu1, Ahmet Şirinkan1i, Sertaç Erciş1, Nurcan Demirel2 Atatürk University, Faculty of Sport sciences, 1 Department of Recreation, Erzurum, Turkey Atatürk University, Faculty of Sport sciences, 2 Department of Trainer Education, Erzurum, Turkey Abstract: Purpose of Study: The aim of this research is studying the 1st class of female sports students science faculty according to school entry branch flexibility and balance parameters of the end of the year (2015-2016 school year). Material and Methods: Research the faculty of sports science teaching, coaching, sports management and recreation section 1 and 2 of the teaching students. 155 students participated: 45 of the subject females and 110 males. Student faculty input branches of the winter sports (skiing, tobogganing, ice skating, ice hockey, curling), volleyball, gymnastics, basketball and handball students, with sit-and-reach flexibility, measurement tool for the study of static and dynamic balance measuring device was used. In addition, the flexibility of the students arm-back, reverse back flexibility were determined. Dynamic equilibrium in the balance measurements were static balance and one foot left-right balance measurements. Measurements were made before the 15-minute warm-openingstretching. Analysis: The obtained data were recorded for between branches comparisons. The age of the subjects was analyzed section and the branch distribution. Findings and Results: According to research results, it is found that dynamic balance and static balance measurements of athletes who are interested in winter sports (skiing, tobogganing, ice skating, ice hockey, curling) are much better than dynamic balance and static balance measurements of athletes who are interested in team sports Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 51 R. Nazım Saraçoğlu, Ahmet Şirinkan, Sertaç Erciş, Nurcan Demirel COMPARISON OF FLEXIBILITY AND BALANCE PARAMETERS BETWEEN THE SPORT BRANCHES OF THE GIRLS AT THE FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCES (volleyball, basketball and handball). Also, it is seemed that dynamic balance and static balance data of gymnastic branch students are better than team sport athletes’ data. Keywords: flexibility, balance, sport, parameters 1. Introduction Sport is an area of work where basic motoric features are frontal. Features of people who is interested in this area as strength, speed, balance, skill, flexibility, coordination and promptness should be much more developed compared with other people’s features. It is important that these features of people, who want to be trained or be competitive, especially in a sports branch, are developed or sustainable for development. If a person will be directed to any sport branch at a young age, along with the basic motor skills of the children, the talents and interests should be investigated and talent selection should be made. The talent selection will determine children’s future sport career. Athletes, who are educated in TOHM (Turkish Olympic Preparation Center) which is instructor, guide the selection process and athlete training policy in our country in recent years, are scientifically prepared and trained for performing these issues. Most of TOHM athletes that take part in Turkish National Team show the efficiency of these centers. Sport science students who participated to our research, especially interested in winter sports, should also be athletes in our national teams, reveal the significant results in dynamic balance and static balance data. For viewing / downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejep/article/view/1063 European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science - Volume 3 │ Issue 11 │ 2017 52