European Journal of Education Studies
ISSN: 2501 - 1111
ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111
Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu
10.5281/zenodo.1044013
Volume 1│Issue 1│2014
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT
AGE CHILDREN WITH COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A
LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
O. A. Oribabori
PhD, Institute of Education,
Faculty of Education,
Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Nigeria
Abstract
This is a chronicle of a remedial programme implemented to address the learning
problems of children with communication disorder in a location in Lagos State. The
report presents the history of educational programme of the community,and the nature
of the intervention which includes the policy framework with which the intervention
was packaged, the staffing involved, parental involvement, the integration of the
programme into the regular school and the curriculum of the programme. The report
also provided information on the success recorded in the programme and suggestions
for its sustenance
Keywords: intervention programme, infant age children, communication disorders
1. Introduction
A vibrant society is that which has concern for every citizen irrespective of any feature
that makes one different from the other. In particular, a society becomes functional and
progressive when special attention is devoted to those members who have special
needs. It is common knowledge that in a large metropolitan community like Lagos,
there are individuals with different physical needs such as communication disorder.
Such individuals get abandoned if recognition is not@ made of them since it is pretty
difficult of them to voice out their needs. Communication skills are crucial to experience
of life, especially for beginning children in language development as this is critical to
Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved
Published by Open Access Publishing Group ©2015.
1
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
cognitive development and learning. Forms of language needed by an average
individual include reading, writing, gesturing, listening, and speaking. All of these are
necessary for communication. Learning takes place through the process of
communication. The ability to participate in active and interactive communication with
peers and adults in the educational setting is essential for a student to succeed in school.
This piece is therefore targeted at addressing the challenges of this group of individuals
and the strategies to bring them on board.
2. Historical perspectives
Community authority in Lagos like most others had no specialist provision for pupils
with communication disorders in the early 1970s. The particular needs of these pupils
were frequently not recognised. Most were attending ordinary schools with whatever
support an understaffed speech therapy service might provide, or were placed in
special schools, usually for those categorised educationally subnormal. A few were
placed in one of the specialist language schools.
The impetus for developing more appropriate educational provision for these
children came from a group of professionals working out from a hospital-based Child
Development Centre and involved in the diagnosis and assessment of children with
communication difficulties. The three professionals concerned - the principal
educational psychologist, a speech therapist and a pediatric neurologist recognised the
existence of a group of children "who, even with regular speech therapy and fair cognitive
ability, were not going to succeed" in ordinary schooling and yet were not in need of the
highly specialised approach of a special school. They felt it was their responsibility and
a challenge too - to develop some form of middle ground alternative.
Fuller consideration of the matter revealed that there were "no precedents to go
on". Whatever form this provision took it would inevitably be a pioneering activity, "a
shot in the dark", as one of those involved later was to describe it. They opted to
establish two Language Development Units for infant age children with specific
language disorders.
Having presented this plan to the Education Committee and secured agreement
for it, they set about putting it into practice. The psychologist drew upon his knowledge
and experience of the authority's schools in order to determine suitable locations for the
classes. In both instances, he was able to capitalise upon his sound relations with the
head teacher. The classes, which opened in April and September 1974 respectively. were
intended from the beginning to be quite small (a maximum of six later increased
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
2
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
slightly). Language disorder is less prevalent than many handicapping conditions.
Those responsible obtained an indication of the likely incidence level from a study
carried out in another urban authority in the 1960s. This suggested a prevalence rate of
specific language disorder among school age children of normal intelligence of around
one per 1000. Subsequent experience was to prove this figure a reliable working guide roughly one per 1250 of the child population of primary school age and normal
intelligence is in the language classes.
A notable feature of the planning and initiation of this provision was the very
informal way in which it was handled - "nothing is written down". This informality was
considered an asset on account of the flexibility it gave. Particularly in a new situation
where there were few precedents or existing working models to draw on, it was felt that
formal written procedures would have held up the development. Some staff did
acknowledge, with the benefit of hindsight, that the absence of explicit agreements did
have drawbacks. "We should have had a common plan" to guard against uncertainty and to
"clarify the roles [of the school staff involved]". It was felt too that the provision was
vulnerable to staff changes; it could be seriously affected, for example, by a new head
teacher who had different priorities or was unsympathetic to the mode of working that
had evolved.
It should be noted that these classes were part of a comprehensive attempt made
through the 1970s to meet the needs of all pupils experiencing problems with their
language development within the authority (and four or five neighbouring authorities
which had little or no provision of their own). Thus, two more classes, located at an
open-air school and a maladjusted school respectively, were opened to provide for
junior age pupils who, in addition to language problems, also had slight physical or
emotional
problems.
A
fifth
class
was
attached
to
a
special
school
for
children (aged 5-13) with moderate learning difficulties. The 'language team' based
upon the Child Development Centre seeks to use the provision available in a flexible
way.
Finally in this section, a brief mention of the particular schools chosen to house
the two classes. One was a nursery/infant school with about 250 children while the
other was a small city-centre school with about 150 across the primary age range. Both
the principal psychologist and the respective head teacher readily welcomed the
suggestion that their schools should house this specialist provision - indeed, one head's
view was, "I don't see how you can treat them anywhere else." She spoke from personal
experience, having a child of her own with a communication disorder. Having
handicapped children attend ordinary schools was to her a means of "releasing a normal
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
3
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
child into a normal world". Their handicap was such that "they might never have broken out
of it" if placed in a special school where they might hear little normal language. There
was also the perceived benefit of "peer competitively" which they would experience in an
ordinary school - "he probably wouldn't have been stretched 10 the same way that he is here by
his peers" if attending special school.
Additional factors in the choice of these schools included: availability of space'
the fact that one of the schools had already taken children with language problems "We've always had them before, it's just that they've been screened out"; and the presence on
one of the school staffs of a teacher who had a general interest in language development
and who furthermore, was regarded by her head as "a well-organised infant teacher who
had already proved herself in a large class setting".
There was no formal consultation or preparation of the school staffs, though one
head made a point of discussing it with staff and emphasising that it was an honour for
the school to be chosen for this development. The teachers in charge, upon being
appointed, did a good deal of informal dissemination about what was proposed, what
these children's difficulties were and so on. Each saw it as her responsibility to win an
acceptance for her children in the school. It undoubtedly helped that in both instances
the teacher appointed either was or had been a member of the school staff and was thus
not a total stranger about the school. Both were appointed one term before their class
took in its first pupils. This was deliberate - to facilitate their own preparation and to
strengthen relations with the parent school. As one head observed, it meant that the
teacher was not "an expert who suddenly appeared in the staffroom".
3. Aims and Organisation of the Intervention
The two classes served the parent authority together with a few neighbouring
authorities which had little or no suitable provision of their own. Their primary
function was in relation to children of infant age and normal intelligence who had a
specific speech or language disorder. This was directly related to the goal of eventual
integration of a child back into his or her local school. (This included placement in an
'opportunity class' for children who face general difficulty in their learning.) This goal
directly influenced the choice of pupils for the classes since those who were unlikely to
be able to cope with ordinary schooling subsequently would not be considered well
placed. When the classes first opened, there was an idea in currency that the specialised
intervention would only be for a short term (perhaps as little as six months). One head
teacher had held out against this - "I insisted they must spend the whole of their infant career
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
4
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
here." It was subsequently agreed that pupils would be attached to the language class
for a considerable period of time, at least two years in the majority of cases.
Another important facet of the working philosophy behind these classes is the
notion that specialist support should be provided within a context of 'normality'. A
written account by a member of the speech therapy service explains further:
'The aim of the language units is to give the children the specialist help they needed while
keeping them within the context of a normal school and home life...
We aim to enable the children to re-integrate into an ordinary school class; initially in
the school where they attended a language unit but eventually, whenever possible, in a
similar school in their own neighbourhood. We felt it to be a major disadvantage of the
"unit" system that as children's language and communication skills improve, we are able
gradually to "wean" them out of the unit and into an ordinary class, while keeping them
"attached" as long as necessary to the unit, to which they return for special help'.
There is also a strong concern that any intervention should commence from as
early an age as possible. This is contingent upon early referral which in turn necessitates
that the provision is known about by referring agencies and that criteria for admission
exist and have been publicized.
Considerable time and energy have been devoted to this end. Diagnosis and
assessment are undertaken by a central language team based in the Child Development
Centre. This team sees itself as co-ordinating service overall conducting assessments
and co-ordinating assessments done by teachers, recommending particular placements
to the authority's Placement Committee, providing the requisite specialist intervention
in part, monitoring children's subsequent performance, and recommending discharge
or further specialist attention at the close of infant schooling.
Both classes are subsumed under the parent schools, each teacher in charge being
answerable to the head teacher - though at one school the organisational arrangements
were not clear-cut. The head teacher, appointed after the class started, stated repeatedly
that he was unsure of the precise relationship that the authority intended between
school and language class - "I would like to have it in black and white where I stand with this
unit" - and implied that this lack of clarification was a consider able drawback.
Certainly, there are unexpected differences between the two classes. For example, while
both teachers in charge are paid out of special services, only in one case is the teacher
regarded as a full member of staff (with position guaranteed in the event of the class
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
5
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
closing or moving). Again in one school the teacher has a formal responsibility for
language development across the school as a whole (this is intended as justification for
paying the special schools allowance); in the other the teacher while also involved with
colleagues does so from her own initiative rather than through a formal appointment by
the school. Both teachers have a good deal of autonomy in their working, though again
the two locations differ in regard to how this has come about. In the one, it seems to
reflect the fact that the teacher is the language expert in the school; in the other it is a
function rather of the distancing of the class from the main school consequent on the
lack of clarity as to who has formal responsibility for it. Some of these differences reflect
a difference in style and approach on the part of the respective heads. In one case the
head has been directly involved in the development of the language class from the
outset and has a strong personal commitment to it. The other head, while not neglecting
the language class, inherited it on arriving at the school and was never given a clear
brief for its working and relationship to the rest of the school. In his eyes, it had to take
its place along with the other three areas of the school (nursery, infant and junior).
4. The Pupils Involved in the Intervention
While it was clear from the outset that these units would be concerned with infant age
children of normal intelligence who had specific language or speech disorders, some
difficulty was experienced in formulating a precise admission policy. The main problem
lay in isolating communication disorder, as distinct from other factors, as the primary
handicapping condition in children of pre-school age. Of the initial batch of 12 or so
entrants, it became evident in the case of some that their language problems were
merely an aspect of general learning difficulties. Given the concern to feed children
eventually into full-time ordinary schooling those working in the service had sought to
eliminate misplacements of this kind. With time staff felt they had achieved this; late in
our fieldwork the consensus was that the vast majority of prospective candidates were
being picked up, that misplacements had been virtually eliminated, and that admission
criteria were not too high or unrealistic. It was affirmed that pupils with language
problems who were not placed in one or other of the classes were being capably dealt
with elsewhere: “Language disordered children requiring less intensive therapy worked with
speech therapists in other departments of the local service.
The framework that was worked with was to ask the precisely question, what
kind of language difficulties do children who are accepted exhibit? In the main, they
will have severe difficulties with comprehension and/or expression. Some have an
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
6
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
associated phonological disorder. Occasionally a child is admitted who has an
exceptionally severe phonological disorder but no serious language disorder. Children
with additional physical handicaps are routed elsewhere. Those children with
additional learning difficulties are directed to the language class attached to an ESN (M)
school. Children with significant hearing loss, or with emotional disorder of which their
language is a symptom rather than a cause, are not accepted
Great emphasis is placed upon the earliest possible referral. This was a particular
difficulty in the early days but has since been largely resolved. The existence of the two
classes was not always known to would-be referring agencies. In some cases, children's
language difficulties remained undetected, largely because of insufficient knowledge
about language disorder within professional and lay communities. (A particular
problem was the rather common attitude that 'things will right themselves of their own
accord in time'.) For these and other reasons, late referrals were common in the early
days. Nowadays, however, children are being identified much earlier - at two or three
years of age. This has highlighted the need for further provision at pre-school level.
While nursery schooling and speech therapy on a weekly basis can be provided for
most pre-school children, those with significant language problems would benefit from
more intensive support.
Most children reach the classes by way of the Child Development Centre where
they are assessed by the language team. (A minority are picked up within the schools'
own nurseries.) The majority of referrals are from speech therapists, educational
psychologists or GPs. The assessment undertaken by the language team is multidisciplinary and involves the following personnel: pediatric neurologist; speech
therapist; and educational psychologist. A senior clinical medical officer, also based at
the Child Development Centre, examines the children, particularly their hearing and
vision. Each child will also be seen by a social worker who completes a social workers'
SE form, SE(SW), peculiar to the authority. Assessments carried out by the language
team are typically informal but wide-ranging. Their basis is getting the child to carry out
various practical tasks and observing his or her reactions, supplemented by questioning
of the child. There is relatively little use of formal testing. The concern is to pick up on
the child's "general level of symbolic thinking ... What can he copy or write? How quickly does
the child learn, pick up ideas? What sort of social skills - feeding, dressing, washing does he
have? Can this child stand being away from the home for long? What's the nature and level of
his play with other children?" The various members of the multi-disciplinary team interact
easily and freely: "We tend to all do our own thing and everybody else's thing ... We tend to
look at the total child within our own sort of background and discipline" (psychologist) - rather
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
7
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
than each professional concentrating on his or her particular specialism and reporting
on it later. It is emphasised by the team that assessment must be a continuous activity
rather than a once for all decision. In this regard, the speech therapist is a crucial liaison
agent between the school and the rest of the team.
The team's placement recommendation is forwarded to the Placement
Committee. This comprises the following personnel: assistant director of education
(special education); senior medical officer (child health); principal educational
psychologist; social services representatives and an administrator. None of these will
normally have personal knowledge of the children being discussed. They will have
received SE forms 2 and 3 and the SE(SW). The Committee normally endorses the
recommendations presented to it, and it would be considered exceptional if it reached a
contrary decision.
Both of these language classes accept only infant age children. At the end of
infant schooling, various forward placements are possible: opportunity class; regular
class; a further language class; or even special schooling. Thirty-six pupils left the two
classes in the six years from April 1974 to July 1980. Thirty-five of these were retained
within various local provisions as follows:
12 to an ordinary class in their local junior school
4 to a top infants class in their local school
therapy
3 to an ordinary class in their local school but still receiving regular speech
2 to an opportunity class in their local school
needs speech therapy)
6 to a junior language class attached to an ESN (M) school (one of these no longer
8 to junior language classes attached to other types of special school (at least two
later transferred to an ordinary or opportunity class in their local school).
With regard to following up pupils when they have left, it is the speech
therapist’s responsibility to maintain a watching brief. Pupils are formally discharged
one year after leaving the language class unless there is continuing need of regular or
occasional speech therapy. It is considered important to allow sufficient time to ensure
progress is satisfactory over a reasonable period of time.
5. Staffing of the Intervention Programme
Each class has its own teacher in charge. In one case, there are two classroom assistants,
one of whom is a trained NEB; in the other, there is only one assistant. This difference is
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
8
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
a historical one. The head teacher in question was asked if she would be willing to
accept a boy with severely disturbed behaviour. She agreed on condition that a full-time
assistant was provided for him. When he later transferred to a special school, the head
managed to retain the assistant by agreeing to a rise in the number of children in the
unit from six to eight.
Both teachers have been through ordinary teacher training; neither has a
specialist qualification in language disorder. (Until 1979 no relevant training had been
available apart from the dual speech therapy/ teaching qualification.) Both had been on
the staff of the school prior to this appointment. One had taught at the school for three
years. Having left the area for some time she returned, applied for the position and was
appointed. As part of her preparation, she taught in a school for pupils with severe
learning difficulties for one term, as well as visiting various types of special school. She
also sat in on speech therapy sessions and visited language units outside the authority.
She attended a two-term evening course on language disorder and was pursuing a
specialist course of training at the time of her appointment. The second teacher also
spent time before her class opened visiting relevant provisions elsewhere, speech
therapy clinics and so forth.
As regards the assistants, one is a trained NEB with an interest in language
development. Two of them have been in post since the start. Considerable importance
was attached by one head to having a stable staff - particularly since there was a
deliberate intention of providing raining 'on-the-job'. The nursery nurse had
accompanied the teacher in charge and head teacher on a part-time evening course
organised by the speech therapy service.
The involvement of outside agencies, in particular the speech therapists from the
language team, is a notable feature of this provision. There are two therapists, each with
responsibility for one of the classes. Each spends one full day per week in school,
providing individual therapy, conducting specialised assessment as necessary and
liaising with the teacher in charge over the programming of the individual children.
The educational psychologist visits more occasionally, at the minimum termly, or when
requested by one of the teachers in charge. His routine visits are directed toward
ensuring children are progressing; visits requested by a teacher will be for a more
specific purpose, eg helping to treat a particular child who is manifesting disturbed
behaviour. In the past links with social services have been very sound, though on most
of our visits, social workers were on strike and no social worker involvement was
possible. It should be noted that the classes suffered from a high turnover rate of staff
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
9
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
from these agencies in the early days, with numerous changes of psychologist, speech
therapist and social worker. Better continuity has been achieved in recent years.
6. Accommodation and Resources
Both classes are housed in classrooms within the body of the parent school. In one case
the location is quite central, just off the hall which is extensively used for assembly, PE,
music and movement and so forth. In the other case, the classroom is relatively isolated
within the school as a whole, though it is close to the nursery and the reception class
with which there is most contact. Playground space is very limited in this school, with
no grassed area. In both cases, the classrooms are quite spacious, an important factor
given the hyperactive nature of some of the children.
Both classes are financed off the special education budget. Thus, necessary items
of equipment, classroom consumables and so on are financed separately from the main
school. The capitation allowance for pupils in these classes is approximately three times
that of a child in the parent school. Both classes are well-resourced and possess
adequate stocks of curricular and play materials.
7. Curriculum
The working philosophy of both classes is one of concentrated individual or small
group teaching based upon sound infant school practice, allied to specialised therapy
and attention in regard of the specific language disorder. In general terms, basic skills
work occupies each morning with creative and play activities in the afternoon.
Children's individual programmes reflect their particular problems, which can vary
widely. All will have difficulties with specific aspects of language development (eg an
immature or abnormal 'speech sound' or phonological system, or an expressive
language delay) accompanied in many instances by difficulties with general educational
development (eg poor short-term memory, an inability to sequence, poor fine or gross
motor skills, extremely limited reading ability). The children keep in contact with the
work their age peers are engaged in through the particular programmes followed in the
language classes together with opportunities for integration, as detailed below.
A careful balance is maintained between specialist language work and the
normal school curriculum. These are the primary responsibility respectively of the
speech therapist and the teacher. The former conducts detailed assessment determines a
programme of work and provides individual treatment. The latter follows the normal
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
10
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
infant curriculum as much as possible, as well as carrying out practice on speech or
language exercises devised by the speech therapist. The speech therapist's contribution
is clearly a critical part of the specialist provision on offer. The following account of
their involvement in the curriculum, as it obtained toward the end of our study, has
been offered by the therapists in post:
The two speech therapists ... have a broadly similar approach. Variations (eg in the
amount of time devoted to group work) are the result of differences in the individual
styles of therapists and teachers, and in the particular needs of the children in a given
unit at a given time."
After initial detailed assessment, long-term aims are arrived at and broken down into
short-term aims with a time scale of weeks. A programme of specific activities is drawn
up which is designed to achieve these aims and is suited to the individual child.
Assessment is continuous and both therapy techniques and long-term aims are modified
in the light of a child's progress...
The speech therapist's assessment covers the general areas of language comprehension,
expressive language and the intelligibility of speech. Language comprehension is looked
at in relation to established developmental norms supplemented by standardised tests of
receptive language, in particular the Reynell Developmental Language Scales.
The child's receptive and expressive vocabulary is also assessed. A somewhat
arbitrary division of expressive language into structure content and use is found useful
in assessment and therapy planning. Where detailed assessment of structure is needed
the LARSP profile, developed by Crystal and his colleagues, is used. Content and
function of language are linked with a child's more general symbolic abilities....
The intelligibility of a child's speech is also assessed. Difficulties here may be due to
poor monitoring by the child or to a delayed or deviant phonological system. Less
frequently, they may be due to an articulation disorder - ie poorly co-ordinated motor
control for speech. Occasionally a child will have a very specific problem, such as hypernasality due to a poor mobility of the soft palate. Where a phonological disorder is the
problem, the therapist will analyse the child's deviant 'speech sound' system. On the
basis of this analysis, and bearing in mind the normal developmental pattern of speech,
the therapist will devise work to help the child develop a normal and intelligible system.
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
11
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
In both units the therapist and teacher jointly keep a work book for each child in which
long and short term aims are recorded, together with the specific activities involved in the
daily therapy programme (eg games to help establish the use of verb-plus-object
utterances; minimal pair work to establish a particular contrast in the "speech sound"
system). As well as weekly discussion of these programmes and of the group work
associated with them, both teacher and therapist make notes in the book of how the child
copes with the work and of the progress made.'
8. Progress Monitoring
There are both informal and more formal measures taken to appraise pupils' progress.
The former are the personalised diaries which the teachers in charge keep, in which are
entered particular things of note (eg an unexpected or pronounced improvement, a
persistent failure in some aspect of schoolwork). The first part of each entry typically
focuses upon the child's personality and emotional or social development; this is the
teacher's subjective appraisal. The second part details progress in the area of language
and number and is somewhat more objective. These diaries are completed on a
fortnightly basis. In cognisance of the amount of time they take, one teacher has two
free periods each week partly in order to maintain this diary. They are acknowledged to
have most meaning for the teacher herself, who has the necessary detailed knowledge
on
each
child
against
which
these
comments
and
observations
must
be 'read'. They were described by one head teacher as an "educated opinion" about the
child's educational development, as opposed to the more definitive pronouncements
expected of an educational psychologist who has formal tests at his disposal. The
workbooks jointly maintained by the teacher and speech therapist are a further informal
means of monitoring progress.
On a more formalised level, case conferences are held at least annually, at which
the circumstances of each pupil in the unit will be comprehensively reviewed by a
multi-disciplinary team comprised of: paediatric neurologist; educational psychologist;
speech therapist; school medical officer; teacher in charge; and head teacher. In advance
of the conference itself the three professional workers most closely involved (teacher,
therapist and psychologist) produce a joint report which serves as the basis for
discussion. This addresses various aspects of the individual's development: basic details
including any changes in home background; physical attributes (eg appearance, vision,
hearing); general development (including social independence, relationships with
adults and peers); general ability (a general account from the psychologist, plus
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
12
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
information on the child's play); educational attainment (reading, writing, spelling,
number); and language and speech (including comprehension, expression, language
content, vocabulary and phonology). Also included are teaching objectives and specific
therapy aims, together with an overall summary for the immediate future. These quite
exhaustive reports are supplemented at the conference with tapes designed to illustrate
the improvement a child has made or any area of continuing difficulty.
9. Integration of Pupils
All pupils attending these language classes experience some integration, but there are
considerable variations in the nature and extent of the integration both between classes
and within them depending on the progress of individual pupils. In broad outline, the
difference between the classes is that in one integration tends to be for individuals
whereas in the other the emphasis is on group activities. There are some group activities
in the former case of course - music and movement, hymn practice, television, lunch
and playtime (though language class children have the playground to themselves for
part of each day). PE was taken with a class from main school at one stage, but the
clumsiness and poor gross motor control of several of the children impeded the flow of
the lesson, and it was decided it would be best for them to do it on their own.
This school has a definite strategy for feeding pupils into ordinary classes. The
decision to initiate the process is taken by the teacher in charge, in consultation with the
speech therapist and the class teacher involved. It is done carefully and on an
individual basis - "They are weaned out gradually from this very protective situation" - and
only when the pupil has given clear signs of progress in both basic attainments
(reading, writing and number) and general language development. Typically, a pupil
will begin by spending part of each afternoon in the ordinary classroom, participating
in creative play activities. The amount of time spent there will be gradually increased,
though care is taken to ensure that the progress made within the language class is not
jeopardised. A pupil can easily be withdrawn should anything untoward occur.
Ultimately, he or she may become a full-time member of the class, being withdrawn
only for perhaps 15-20 minutes of specialised language work each day, before
eventually being transferred to the local school.
The emphasis in the other class is, as noted, on more extensive integration for the
group as a whole. This developed initially for two reasons: first, the teacher in the
language class exchanged with the reception class so that her children would have
contact with 'normal' children and also so that each teacher had a break from the
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
13
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
children she had primary responsibility for and could have experience of another
group; secondly, both classes were timetabled for television and music and movement
at the same time and "it seemed sensible to put them together". No attempt is made to
integrate as a group into the infant class, mainly because children in the language class
are considered too immature. However, four pupils have been individually integrated
into this class, and a further two into the reception class. All told, they spend about 25
per cent of their time with classes in main school.
The teachers in charge of both language classes see themselves very much as an
integral part of the parent school. In one case this union is formalised the teacher is a
member of the school staff and also is responsible for language development within the
school (she advises other teachers on the use of language materials, or where a child is
presenting particular problems, and may even refer the child to the speech therapist). In
addition, she takes a period of singing with the whole school once a week, and is in
charge of a second year infant class one afternoon each week. At the second school, the
very good personal relationships that obtain reflect the personality, tact and hard work
of this teacher - helped by the small size of the school. Where there has been an
exchange of pupils this has been done with the overall benefit to her own pupils in
mind. Any advice upon language problems that this teacher offers is done informally
and reflects her assimilation into the school.
In general terms, the children in both cases have found wide acceptance within
the parent school. However, this has not always been the case. At one of the schools a
good many of the children accepted in the early days had emotional and behavioural
problems in addition to considerable communication difficulties and low ability. This
was rather a shock to both the staff and to parents with children already at the school. It
led to a good deal of isolation at first - they were regarded by some main school pupils
as rather freakish. This necessitated patient explanation on several occasions from the
acting head. The situation was eased with the arrival of further children whose
behaviour was less erratic.
Since this time good relations have developed, subject to the limitations imposed
by the children having to be transported to and from school. At one school, it was
pointed out that friendship patterns closely reflected where the children came from - "It
takes a long time for anybody to be accepted, it's a very close-knit community." In the other
location, both teachers in the school and the head were adamant that there had been no
difficulties in the way of teasing or lack of acceptance. Individual personality was
considered the significant factor in winning acceptance - more than, for example, level
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
14
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
of intelligibility. The age of the children also helps - infants become accustomed to
abnormalities very quickly.
Other relevant factors included the high visibility of the language class children
in the school, and the degree of involvement in the life of the school by the teacher in
charge.
10. Parental Involvement in the Intervention
Involvement with parents is seen by teachers in terms of general contact rather than
engaging them in any specific, structured programme of language for their child.
Structured involvement was not perceived by either of the language class teachers as
necessary or appropriate. "These kids have had intensive teaching here" was one teacher's
comment. She pointed to the presence of three adults in her class, which meant that
when children were set work they were very closely supervised and could be quite
tired by the end of the day. A head teacher, offering support for this view, noted, "I feel
it is much more important for that mum to be a mum." There was a general belief that the
parents of many of the children would not be very forthcoming if their active
involvement was requested. Parents were concerned and interested of course, but the
common perception was that they were handing their children over to the experts and
did not seek or want a direct involvement for themselves:
"A lot really don't want to know what you are doing although they are interested in the
results." Contact between teachers and parents takes place on school premises,
either on the occasion of open days, which are held termly, or when a parent takes up
the open invitation to visit whenever he or she feels the need. The open day is
particularly important in that the small number of children in the classes allows the
teacher to spend a reasonable amount of time (up to 30 minutes) with each parent,
seeking to get across the importance of proper attitudes toward the use of language,
appropriate correction and so forth. From talking to a small number (four) of parents,
there was every indication of satisfaction with the opportunity for contact afforded by
such occasions. One criticism was voiced about the timetabling of parents' visits in one
class; while this guaranteed each parent an exclusive session with the teacher it tended
to preclude contact with other parents, something that many would have welcomed.
The "free for all" arrangement that prevailed in open days in the other class led to a
good
deal
of
interaction
between
parents,
and
indeed
resulted
in
some
lasting friendships.
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
15
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
One particular factor which makes contact with the home more difficult to
arrange, and effectively impedes contact between parents, is the distance most of these
parents live from school. Teachers seek to get around this by relying on written
communication. They emphasised that with regard to disseminating relevant
information on a child, or consulting the parent over important issues - for example,
transfer on at age seven - then parents were kept fully informed.
Speech therapists had a closer working involvement with families, but it was still
much less than they would have liked. Constraints of time and distance (and lack of
observation space in the schools) made it difficult to work in a close and. structured
way with parents. Their more modest aim is 'to visit each child's home at least twice a
year and see some of them for weekly or small group intensive therapy during the
school holidays'. There is also a home/school book for some children which contains
specific weekly work for the parents to do with their children. Parents spoke in very
positive terms about the benefits their children had obtained from attending the
language classes. One mother, whose son had been attending for 15 months, remarked
upon how he had "picked up smashing" in this time. He was able to talk now, while his
reading and writing had "come on a treat". "I don't think he would have come on the same if
he hadn't gone there." Another mother, whose son had previously attended an ordinary
infant school, noted, " [Before] he couldn't write, he couldn't even count ... Since he has gone
to this school he's marvellous ... Everyone can understand him now. Now I can send him on a
message - before I used to give him a note." In a third case parents told of how their son's
speech had previously been unintelligible and his behaviour quite uncontrollable at
times. Now he was capable of holding a conversation and his behaviour was more
consistent. His mother was particularly pleased with his progress at reading while his
father fully endorsed the placement: "If I knew any child in a similar situation I would
recommend they go there."
11. Summary
This authority has comprehensive provision at primary level for pupils with speech and
language disorders. There are five classes in all, supported by a language team
operating from a hospital-based Child Development Centre. This account is focussed on
the two classes located in ordinary schools, both for infant age children. These have
developed effective ways of working with infants with speech and language disorders
and have returned approximately half of their leavers to ordinary fulltime education.
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
16
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
They share a common approach and offer a broadly similar provision, though there are
some significant differences.
The main questions for the future in a provision of this nature have perhaps to
do with maintaining the momentum and level of service already achieved. There are a
few further considerations, however:
1. Are the monitoring arrangements adequate when pupils are discharged from the
language classes? Would a more long-term follow-up indicate, as it has done in
some other instances, a need for a more prolonged involvement on the part of
the language team?
2. Will it prove necessary to establish provision at secondary stage?
3. None of the classes for pupils over the age of seven is in an ordinary school. Will
staff - and parents - be happy for this to continue?
4. Would children benefit if ways could be found of involving their families more
actively and systematically in the effort to meet their special needs?
5. Are the classes sufficiently well established to cope with a change of
head
teacher,
or
being
assigned
a
lower
priority
by
one
of
the
numerous support agencies?
References
1. Anderson, E. M. (1973). The disabled schoolchild. London: Methuen.
Cope, C. And Anderson, E.(1977). Special Units in ordinary schools. Windsor:
NFER (for University of London, Institute of Education).
2. Dale, D.M.C. (1972). Deaf children at home and at school. London: University of
London Press.
3. Date, D. M. C. (in press). Test of speech production: consonant articulation.
4. Department of Education and Science Ministry of Education (1962). Circular
10/62. London: HMSO.
5. Department of Education and Science (1972). The education of the visually
handicapped (Vernon report). London: HMSO.
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
17
O. A. Oribabor –
AN ACCOUNT OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMME FOR INFANT AGE CHILDREN WITH
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS WITHIN A LARGE METROPOLITAN LAGOS COMMUNITY
Creative Commons licensing terms
Author(s) will retain the copyright of their published articles agreeing that a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) terms
will be applied to their work. Under the terms of this license, no permission is required from the author(s) or publisher for members of the community
to copy, distribute, transmit or adapt the article content, providing a proper, prominent and unambiguous attribution to the authors in a manner that
makes clear that the materials are being reused under permission of a Creative Commons License. Views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this
research article are views, opinions and conclusions of the author(s). Open Access Publishing Group and European Journal of Education Studies shall
not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability caused in relation to/arising out of conflicts of interest, copyright violations and
inappropriate or inaccurate use of any kind content related or integrated into the research work. All the published works are meeting the Open Access
Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes
under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 1 │ Issue 1 │ 2014
18