Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │ Issue 10 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.918305 DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF AN INTEGRATED TEACHING METHOD FOR TEACHING ECOSYSTEMS Vasiliki Tsiachta1, Stefanos Paraskevopoulos2i Dr., University of Thessaly, 1 Department of Special Education, Greece Prof., University of Thessaly, 2 Department of Special Education, Greece Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present and evaluate the Integrated Teaching Method (ITM) which is an innovative teaching model incorporating comprehensive teaching content, effective teaching strategies, and specifically-designed lesson plans. ITM was developed based on modern learning theories in conjunction with the latest findings in cognitive psychology and the neuroscience of the brain. ITM was implemented on Year 8 Greek secondary school students to teach the ecosystem and was assessed in comparison to Didactic Teaching Strategies (DTS), based on a traditional teaching method. The data collection tools were questionnaires on students’ knowledge, comprehension, application and attitudes/opinions towards the environment. ANOVA and t-Test showed that students who were taught with ITM as opposed to those taught with DTS: a) achieved better results in knowledge, comprehension and application of the teaching content, and b) achieved equally good results in terms of attitudes/opinions towards the environment. The findings suggest that ITM had a greater impact and improved the level of student knowledge to a larger extent than DTS. ITM can thus be considered an effective teaching methodology and is proposed to be implemented in the multidisciplinary teaching of biology, environmental education and Ecology; its effectiveness in the other science subjects should also be assessed. Keywords: multi-disciplinary approach, Integrated Teaching Method, Aristotle teaching strategy Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 74 Vasiliki Tsiachta, Stefanos Paraskevopoulos DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF AN INTEGRATED TEACHING METHOD FOR TEACHING ECOSYSTEMS 1. Introduction The major objectives of contemporary education are that students should acquire both theoretical and practical knowledge as well as gain skills in cooperation, critical thinking, responsibility and autonomy. The educational process in junior High School (Gymnasio) in Greece today is still based mainly on traditional pedagogy. Nevertheless, in recent years a concerted effort has been made at modernization, either by updating the teaching methodology or by adapting the curriculum to the needs of modern society. In response to the fact that in Greece there has been little evaluation of multidisciplinary approaches to teaching in both theory and methodology, a number of researchers have proposed that such studies be carried out (Kafetzopoulos et al. 2003 Soulioti & Pange 2004). In the Declaration of Thessaloniki adopted at the International Conference on Environment and Society in 1997, it is stated that in order to provide environmental education to students aiming at environmental protection and sustainable development whose impact will be maintained throughout students’ lives, the following need to apply: a) there should be a set of specific objectives and action plans designed with concrete targets and teaching strategies, b) the community of teachers and scientists need to ensure that the teaching content is based on sound knowledge and accurate upto-date information, c) the teaching content must meet the needs of society and sustainable development, and d) knowledge and awareness of the environment must have the potential for incorporation into the existing school subjects so that through multidisciplinary teaching approaches, Environmental Education (EE) objectives are met (Knapp 2000). Mappin & Johnson (2005) argue that detaching EE from the other school subjects merely reinforces humans’ separation from nature. An attempt needs to be made by both teachers and researchers to develop new creative approaches to EE, whose content will be clearly understood by all learners. By acquiring the basic principles and concepts, explanations of how phenomena function, students learn to apply them to and for their entire lives (Cole 2007). Manzanal et al (1999), Hangerford & Volk (2003), Slingsby & Barker (2003) and Adamson et al. (2003) proposed that field work should play a central role in teaching EE because, among others, students are given the opportunity to enhance their critical thinking and evaluation skills through the analysis of a problem in their local community. Fischer et al. (2007) believe that new discoveries about brain function require cautious interpretation to be followed by investigations that test their applications in the classroom. In addition, according to Stern (2005) there needs to be a review of teaching so that it is based on data of neuroscience of the brain, which uses European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 10 │ 2017 75 Vasiliki Tsiachta, Stefanos Paraskevopoulos DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF AN INTEGRATED TEACHING METHOD FOR TEACHING ECOSYSTEMS contemporary methods that associate learning to the structure and functioning of the brain. Therefore, there is a need for empirical research in Greece and worldwide, on the multi-disciplinary approach to teaching which is linked to the current findings of neuroscience. The present study addressed the following hypothesis: The multi-disciplinary approach to the teaching of Biology, Ecology and Environmental Education with the Integrated Teaching Method (ITM), is more effective than the more traditional approach of Didactic Teaching Strategy DTS in terms of: a increasing students’ knowledge, comprehension and application of the new knowledge acquired about the ecosystem in a given situation, and b improving students’ attitudes and opinions towards natural ecosystems. For downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1053 European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 10 │ 2017 76