Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │Issue 10 │2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1044232 GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS Jonida Leshai University of Shkodra, Albania Abstract: Researchers and academics have recently developed a great deal of interest in the beliefs of the self-efficacy beliefs of the teachers given the fact that such a construct promotes effectiveness to teachers and also obtains solutions to problems in teacher education. The literature shows that teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs influence classroom instructions, student learning and performance. The study was conducted to explore the primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs with respect to gender. Teachers’ sense of efficacy scale was used to collect data from the participants. Findings revealed a significant difference between male and female teachers on student engagement and classroom management where male teachers were likely to be significantly better in classroom management and student engagement than female teachers. Keywords: gender, primary school, teachers, self-efficacy beliefs 1. Literature review There are two main sources on which the concept of teacher efficacy is supported and formulated (Tschannen-Moran, Hoy and Hoy, 1998). The first source is based on the theory of the Locus of Control (Rotter, 1966) and the second source derives from the Social cognitive theory of Bandura (Bandura, 1986). Teachers’ self-efficacy in relation with the locus of control theory is perceived as a measure in which teachers believe that the factors that can control have a major impact on teaching outcomes than the belief that the environment has the greatest power (Tschannen-Moran et al., 1998). According to this theory, teachers with internal Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 731 Jonida Lesha GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PRIM“RY SCHOOL TE“CHERS’ SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS locus are able to teach difficult and unmotivated students and have greater achievements in their teaching, while teachers with external locus have less confidence in their teaching skills and believe that the environment has the greatest impact on student learning, compared to their teaching ability. The social cognitive theory of Bandura attempts to predict and explain human behavior. A key component of Social- Cognitive theory is human action. According to ”andura, the power to originate actions for certain purposes is the main feature of personal action. Human action refers to the deliberate choice of an individual for taking measures to accomplish a particular purpose (Bandura, 1986), whereas human behaviour is determined by a number of factors that interact. Bandura (1994) has perceived and defined self-efficacy as trusting people about their ability to produce certain levels of performance that exerts influence on events that affect their lives . Viewed as a multidimensional construction, self-efficacy has two components: (1) expectations from oneself, (2) expectations from the outcome (Gibson and Dembo, 1984). Self-expectations are beliefs that relate to personal capacity to perform a task, behavior or ability, while expectation from the outcome is the general belief that a behavior will result in a particular conclusion (Bandura, 1986; Gibson and Dembo, 1984). For this reason, behavior is thought to be influenced not only by the belief that a certain action will lead to desirable results, but also by the belief that it has the ability to carry it out. According to Bandura (1986), self- efficacy, is perceived as judging people in their abilities, organizing and executing the performance of required actions, to achieve certain types of performance . It has to do not only with concern for the skills it possesses, but also with the judgment of what it can do with the skills it owns. Self- efficacy determines how people feel motivated, behaved and think for themselves through four major processes: cognitive, motivational, emotional, and selective. People get information about their efficacy from four sources: 1) Mastery experiences are one of the most influential sources of information about efficacy. They originate from mastering personal experiences. 2) Vicarious experiences are also important for efficacy. Respecting the perseverance of other individuals through difficult tasks can increase efficiency expectations by providing a model for success. 3) Verbal persuasion is usually used to influence behavior. It affects effectiveness, especially in negative situations. If people are convinced they have what it is needed to be successful, they exert more effort, but if they feed doubts, problems will arise . 4) Physiological arousal affects people’s confidence in self –efficacy as people rely on these factors to judge their abilities (Bandura, 1999). People rely on their European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 10 │ 2017 732 Jonida Lesha GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PRIM“RY SCHOOL TE“CHERS’ SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS physical and emotional status to judge their abilities. Emotional awakening significantly affects expectations of efficacy, but high levels of awakening or anxiety increases the sense of ownership or incompetence. Teachers’ self-efficacy is his/her judgment of the ability to bring desired outcomes to the engagement of students in learning, even to students who may be difficult or unmotivated (Tschannen–Moran and Woolfolk–Hoy, 2001). Teachers’ self-efficacy is a self-perception, not an objective measure of teaching effectiveness (Ross and Bruce, 2007). Self-efficacy should not be confused with the professional competence of a teacher. It is an important variable in teacher development and in the way, teachers teach. It is important to support the teacher to develop efficacy convictions at the beginning of the career. Over time, teachers need to develop and stabilize a set of beliefs (Tschannen-Moran et al., 1998). These beliefs, in teachers’ selfefficacy vary gradually with the influence of many resources (Bandura, 1986). For viewing / downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1174 European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 10 │ 2017 733