Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │Issue 11│2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1063680 TURKISH AND ETHIOPIAN TEACHERS’ VIEWS ABOUT STUDENTS’ UNDESIRABLE BEHAVIOURS IN THE CLASSROOM AND THE TECHNIQUES THEY USE TO COPE UP WITH: A CASE STUDY Kelemu Zelalem Berhanu1i, Ali Sabancı2 Student in Educational Sciences Institute of Akdeniz University, Turkey 1 Associate Professor, Dr. Akdeniz University Faculty of Education, 2 Educational Sciences, Educational Administration, Supervision, Economy and Planning, Antalya, Turkey Abstract: The overall purpose of this study was to identify teachers’ views about types and causes of students’ undesirable behaviours and the techniques they use to cope up with. This study is qualitative in nature, and in the pattern of a holistic multiple case study. To identify the schools, the researchers used convenience sampling technique. The work group was determined using maximum variable sampling. As a result, the working group consisted of four participants from Turkish school and four from Ethiopian school. The data were collected be a semi-structured questionnaire interviewing the participants face to face. The data were analysed by the help of computer program called Nvivo using content analysis technique. The observed behaviours common to both schools were being late, cheating, not doing the given tasks, talking without permission during the lesson, hyperactivity and lack of attention, complaining about their teacher to family, not paying attention to personal hygiene and being rude. On the other hand, In Ethiopia, attaching nickname to friends, picking up and leaving the class in the middle of lesson, eating and drinking at the wrong time, insulting and not sitting properly; in Turkey producing a variety of excuses and complaints, silence, selfishness, naughtiness, swearing, lack of interest in cultural activities and theatre play, smoking cigarettes secretly were undesirable behaviours determined peculiar to each culture. A close, positive and supportive relationship between all school stakeholders is essential Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 307 Kelemu Zelalem ”erhanu, “li Sabancı TURKISH “ND ETHIOPI“N TE“CHERS’ VIEWS “”OUT STUDENTS’ UNDESIR“”LE ”EH“VIOURS IN THE CLASSROOM AND THE TECHNIQUES THEY USE TO COPE UP WITH: A CASE STUDY for developing a mutual relationship of respect and for managing undesirable behaviours successfully. Keywords: undesirable behaviours, classroom management, students’ behaviours 1. Introduction Students` undesirable behaviours in school are not new phenomena. Discipline is among the basic ingredient that plays a crucial role in school system (Amogne, 2014, p.23). Predominantly, discipline problems occur when a student refuses to obey rules of the classroom or school. Lack of discipline in school makes it difficult to teach effectively. Maintaining class order and peace is a primary concern of teachers (Doyle, 1984). One of the effects of student indiscipline on teaching learning process is poor performance. Since much time is spent on discipline cases, less time on teaching, and this means that the contents are not completed hence students’ inadequate preparation for the examinations and learning (Alemayehu, 2012, p.16). Maintaining class order is a primary concern of teachers (Doyle, 1984). Misbehaviour in schools and in the classroom is considered to be a serious problem to all those interested in the problematic of teaching (Oliveira, & Amândio, 2013, p.9). Kyriacou (1997, p.121) defines undesirable behaviour as any behaviour from non-compliance such as not paying attention to overt undesirable behaviour such as throwing a missile across the room. Nearly in the same way, Feldhusen (1995) also defined it as disobedience or a violation of school expectations interfering with the orderly conduct of teaching . Shrigley presented a more comprehensive definition that any behaviour that interrupts the teaching acts, or is psychologically or physically unsafe constitutes an undesirable behaviour. This definition comprises of behaviours that would not necessarily slow down the teaching act but is definitely psychologically or physically unsafe and needs teacher’s attention. The types of undesirable behaviours of students vary across teachers (Çetin, 2015, Alemayehu, 2012, p.43-44, & Getiye, 2015, p.39). They are also different across countries and level of class. For example, a study conducted in Singapore showed types of undesirable behaviours of students include: telling lies, being late for class; undesirable behaviour in class, vandalism, using abusive language, truancy, theft, and bullying, not doing homework, and defiance towards teachers, not bringing books to school, inappropriate appearance, negative attitude towards study and shop lifting (Tan & Yuanshan, , p. . In Ethiopia, the most commonly observed students’ undesirable behaviours in secondary schools of students in Guji Zone were ranked as follow: European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 11│ 2017 308 Kelemu Zelalem ”erhanu, “li Sabancı TURKISH “ND ETHIOPI“N TE“CHERS’ VIEWS “”OUT STUDENTS’ UNDESIR“”LE ”EH“VIOURS IN THE CLASSROOM AND THE TECHNIQUES THEY USE TO COPE UP WITH: A CASE STUDY cheating on tests and in-class assignments, being late, failing to submit homework on time, leaving the school without permission, using mobile for illegal purpose at school, failing to bring necessary materials to class, being off task and carelessness, absenteeism, violating the school dress code (Getiye, 2015, p.39). But, according to Alemayehu (2012, p.43-44) study on Shamashemene secondary school students in Ethiopia, the top ranked frequently observed undesirable behaviours included: tardiness, absenteeism (truancy), and disturbing in the classroom like talking without permission, using cell phone etc., cheating on exams, copying assignment, and least efforts, fighting, extortion, coercion, mob action, as well as failing to follow teacher’s instruction. There are evidences that some students also use her/his though outside the school. However, that undesirable that are life threatening as well as damaging the school property were found to be less prevalent. The findings of Amogne (2014, p.23) revealed that disciplinary problems in Ethiopia have been getting worse from time to time and ranges from frequent absenteeism to drinking alcohol and smoking cigarette. The Author added day dreaming, quarrelling, cheating, missing classes, inattentiveness and distributive behaviour are among the manifestations of the problem. Moreover, the undesired behaviours of students that Turkish classroom teachers faced in the classroom have been determined as not obeying the class rules, swearing, talking without permission, shyness, hyperactivity and lack of attention, and problems caused by watching violent TV programs (such as threatening) (Çetin, 2015). As can be seen from the findings of ”alay and Sağlam, the most frequently observed undesirable behaviours also include: speaking without lift their hand, abusive speech, respond to questions by all at the same time, blame each other and coming to school without preparation. Lewis (1991) has distinguished three overlapping types of undesirable, namely: undesirable that inhibits the learner’s own learning, undesirable by one learner, which is destructive to the learning of another, and undesirable which is disrespectful, defiant or abusive to the educator. For viewing / downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1203 . European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 11│ 2017 309