Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │ Issue 9 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.844034 INVESTIGATING THE WORKING MEMORY AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STRATEGIES AMONG MONOLINGUAL AND BILINGUAL CHILDREN IN A CLASSROOM’S SETTING Eleni Rachanioti1, Eleni Griva2i, Anastasia Alevriadou3 PhD student, University of Western Macedonia, Greece 1 Associate Professor, University of Western Macedonia, Greece 2 Professor, University of Western Macedonia, Greece 3 Abstract: The present study aimed at comparing the working memory of Greek monolingual students to bilingual ones from migrant backgrounds who all attend primary school. Secondly, an effort was made to investigate the correlation of the working memory with the academic performance in both groups. Moreover, the correlation of the vocabulary strategies, employed by monolingual and bilingual students in an integrated memorybased text framework (Rachanioti, Griva & Alevriadou, 2017), with their working memory was explored. The sample consisted of 20 monolingual and 20 bilingual students of Albanian origin, who attended the 5th and 6th grade of three primary schools in Eastern Thessaloniki, Greece. The monolingual and bilingual students were matched according to their mark reports on academic performance. The Automated Working Memory Assessment Alloway, 2007 was used to assess the students’ working memory. The data revealed that monolingual and bilingual students did not differ either in the verbal working memory or the visuospatial working memory performance. A statistically significant positive correlation between working memory and academic performance was found in both monolingual and bilingual students. The correlation of the Process strategies with the verbal working memory was statistically significant in monolingual students, as well as in the bilingual ones. The Memory strategies were positively correlated with the verbal and visuospatial working memory in both groups. The Confirmation/consolidation strategies were positively correlated with the verbal Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 33 Eleni Rachanioti, Eleni Griva, Anastasia Alevriadou INVESTIGATING THE WORKING MEMORY AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STRATEGIES AMONG MONOLINGUAL AND BILINGUAL CHILDREN IN A CLASSROOM’S SETTING working memory only in the bilingual students. Results are discussed in terms of memory strategy instruction that may compensate for a poor working memory of both monolingual and bilingual students in a classroom’s setting, thus aiding to improve their academic performance. This study is the first trial of the AWMA in Greek students as well as bilingual immigrant ones. Keywords: working memory, academic performance, vocabulary strategies, monolingual students, bilingual students 1. Introduction 1.1. Working memory Working memory generally refers to our ability to maintain and manipulate a limited amount of information for a short period of time in our mind, when completing cognitive tasks (Baddeley, 1992). Despite its limited capacity, working memory has been found to play a significant role in diverse mental activities such as language comprehension, numeracy and problem solving (Carruthers, 2013). Working memory is involved in reading and listening comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, verbal problem solving and first and second language use as well (Baddeley, 2000; Daneman & Hannon, 2007). There are at least two opposing hypotheses about the relationship between working memory and bilingualism. The first hypothesis suggests that bilingualism can hinder efficient processing of information in the working memory due to the cognitive load imposed by the simultaneous management of two linguistic systems (Sweller & Chandler, 1994; Van Merrienboer & Sweller, 2005). In contrast, the second hypothesis suggests that the developed ability of bilinguals to inhibit one language when using the second one may increase their efficiency of working memory, because they manage its sub-components by using similar types of inhibitory controls (Bialystok, Craik, Klein, & Viswanathan, 2004; Bialystok, Craik & Luk, 2008). For downloading the full article, please access the following link: http://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/964 European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 9 │ 2017 34