European Journal of Special Education Research
ISSN: 2501 - 2428
ISSN-L: 2501 - 2428
Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu
Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.891047
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto1i,
Hari Setijono2,
Edy Mintarto3
Sebelas Maret University,
1
Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36, Surakarta, Indonesia
2,3
State University of Surabaya,
Jl. Ketintang Baru XII No. 34, Surabaya, Indonesia
Abstract:
The evaluation is conducted with the aim to get a comprehensive, holistic, and
empirical picture of Indonesia Paralympic coaching both strategic and technical level,
either off the field and in the field. The method of this research is using descriptive
method with survey technique. Assessment and analysis were conducted directly on
the context dimensions, inputs, processes and products on Indonesia Paralympic
coaching. Instruments used to retrieve data includes: (1) questionnaires for athletes; (2)
interviews for trainers; (3) interviews for managers; (4) Observation; and (5) secondary
data in the form of documents related to the National Paralympic Committee (NPC).
The results of data analysis in general is a combination of all data on each factor and
indicator, the condition of development of Indonesia Paralympic: (1) athlete recruitment
system has been implemented according to the stages that have been set; (2) trainers
and assistant trainers meet the criteria set by Indonesia Paralympic; (3) implementation
of the exercises, namely: annual program, monthly program, weekly program, daily
program, evaluation program has been implemented by Indonesia Paralympic coach;
(4) Centralized consumption meets 74%; of expectations (5) board and lodging meet
84% of expectations ; (6) the carrying capacity of infrastructure and facilities meets 72%
of expectations ; (7) the characteristics of the central sports are: a) Induk Cabang Olahraga
has not been conducted yet, b) regional or central NPC, at the same time, play a role as
Induk Cabang Olahraga; (8) the main source of funds from the government in accordance
with applicable legislation through the allocation of APBN and APBD funds,
community assistance and membership fees.
Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved.
© 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group
102
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
Keywords: coaching, sports, Paralympic, Indonesia
1. Introduction
Exercise is essentially believed to be a miniature of modern human life that is connected
easily to become a global community. This can be said so because in sports activities
there are aspects which are related to goals, struggles, cooperation, competition,
communication and integration, physical strength and mental endurance, togetherness,
responsiveness, decision making, self-expression and sportsmanship. All these aspects
are aspects that exist in the human being both individually and socially participating
actively in the exercise means training one-self to improve the quality of various aspects
to exist in the midst of society to be more dynamic. This is also done by disabled
athletes who still can compete in the international forum although they only participate
in several branch of sport; table tennis and weight lifting categories that can compete in
the world while swimming and athletics categories that can compete in Asia. However,
these conditions still do not describe the position of Indonesia as a country that has
many achievements in the field of sports.
Before exploring further things about the policy that discusses about fostering
and development of disabled sports in Indonesia, it is important to know in advance the
legislation product (umbrella law) that has been issued by the Government of Indonesia
for the sustainability athletes with disabilities in Indonesia, including: (1) The Law of
the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 Year 2005; and (2) Government Regulation of the
Republic of Indonesia Number 16, Number 17 and Number 18 Year 2007. In addition,
the government also issued Presidential Regulation Number 15 Year 2016 (amendment
of Presidential Regulation No. 22/2010) PRIMA) as a national program of sports
performance enhancement that is continuously implemented.
Exercise is an integral part of the nation-building process. The process of good
sports coaching will ultimately lead to the national sporting achievements that can be
proud of in international forums as well as raising dignity of the nation. Talking about
Paralympic is not just talking about sports science and competition rules, but talking
about the wider thing in life. When talking about Paralympic exercise, it must have a
commitment first to foster respect in ourselves for people with disabilities. Such respect
can be realized in a simple way, such as no longer using abusive designations for
persons with disabilities.
Disabled sports also have multi-events as well as normal sports have, such as: (1)
For Southeast Asia level is called Asean Para Games that takes place and held in
conjunction with the implementation of the SEA Games; (2) For the Asian level is called
Asian Para Games which are held in conjunction with the hosting of the Asian Games;
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
103
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
(3) For the world level is called Paralympic Games that takes place and held in
conjunction with the implementation of the Olympic Games. From the multi-events that
is owned by disabled sports, it can be analyzed that the National Paralympic
Committee Indonesia (NPC Indonesia) is not just a functional sport that only gets less
attention, but it should be the main priority because it concerns on the dignity of the
nation.
National Paralympic Committee of Indonesia (NPCI) is an organization for
athletes with special disabilities in the territory of Indonesia. NPCI derives from an
international organization called the International Paralympic Committee (IPC).
National Paralympic Committee (NPC) is a sports organization of achievement for
athletes with disabilities in a country. This organization in Indonesia was originally
named Yayasan Pembina Olahraga Disacusi (YPOC), it was established in Surakarta on
31 October 1962. Based on the suggestion of the Indonesian National Sports Committee
(KONI), the Minister of Youth and Sports, the Minister of Social Affairs of the Republic
of Indonesia and related parties, YPOC needs to be upgraded to become a sports
organization of disabled people of Indonesia by first changing the status from a
foundation into a social organization. In the National Sports Conference (Musornas
YPOC VII from 31 October to 1 November 1993 in Yogyakarta, then this organization is
then established under the new name that is the Board of Trustees of Sports Disability
Indonesia (BPOC) as a continuation of YPOC.
In the National Sports Conference (Musornas) X BPOC on 18-20 November 2008
in Surakarta, on the recommendation of the Minister of Youth and Sports of Indonesia
and follow the rules of Paralympic institutions at the international level, the BPOC
should be enhanced on its existence and its position that the Central BPOC is National
Paralympic Committee (NPC). In the Extraordinary National Sports Meeting held on
July 26, 2010 in Surakarta, it is changed from BPOC, which was once changed YPOC,
becomes NPC Indonesia.
In 2015 according to the Central KONI Decree number 08 / RA / 2015 dated
March 31, 2015 National Paralympic Committee (NPC) which was originally one of the
fields in the National Sports Committee of Indonesia (KONI) since the decree was
issued for NPC became an institution that foster Paralympic sports in Indonesia. Since
the date of stipulation of the Decree, it automatically loses its rights and obligations as a
member of KONI from the central level to the regions. But despite coming out of KONI,
the government is very concerned about the agency that handles the sport for
paralympian. This is evidenced in Indonesia Gold Program (Prima) there is a special
field in Paralympic. Based on data in 2011, Indonesia always lags behind in achieving
Paralympic sports achievement in Southeast Asia level; it can be seen based on Asean
Para Games ranking which is held every two years.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
104
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
Figure 1: Achievement of Indonesia Paralympic on Asean Para Games
(Source: Analysis of Strengths, Challenges, Opportunities and Strategy of Indonesia Facing Multi-Event
(R & D Field of Indonesian NPC) on exposure of APG 2015 Singapore APM)
By knowing the achievement of Paralympian Indonesia, then the government
starts to not override sports for the disabled. Based on the above description, it is
necessary to prepare Indonesia Paralympian to compete harder and be qualified in
international; this research will be focused on the Paralympic sports coaching system in
Indonesia.
Given the importance of Paralympic sports coaching systems in support of
national sports strength, this evaluation was conducted in the hope that the National
Paralympic Committee (NPC) program implementation in subsequent years will be
better. Evaluation process is a process through an assessment of an object to determine
the standard value of the object to be followed up deeper for the progress of achieving
the goal.
This study analyzes how the performance process of Paralympic sports
development in Indonesia, using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model, where
this evaluation model is considered suitable because CIPP model design allows
researchers to conduct a thorough evaluation of the Paralympic sports coaching
program in Indonesia. In addition, the CIPP model is also a comprehensive model and
is often applied because of its practicality; the evaluation results of this model in
accordance with the needs, which means it can facilitate the provision of relevant
information to take policy, improvement on each component of the existing system.
Based on this background, the researcher wanted to reveal what factors were
carried out in evaluating the Indonesian Paralympic sports coaching system in creating
outstanding athletes, especially at international level such as multi events which is
equal to Asean Para Games.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
105
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
Based on the background, the problems in this study can be formulated as
follows: (1) Context dimension, which consists of: a) what is the legal basis of
Indonesian Paralympic coaching? b) What is the performance and implementation of
Indonesian Paralympic organizations and policies? (2) The input dimension, which
consists of: a) what is the recruitment of Indonesian Paralympic athletes? B) What is the
recruitment of Indonesian Paralympic trainers? C) How to support the Paralympic
facilities and infrastructure of Indonesia? D) How to support Indonesia's Paralympic
fund? (3) The process dimension, which consists of: a) what is the process of
developmental pattern and guidance of Indonesian Paralympic exercise model? B) How
to foster social life of Indonesian Paralympic sports athletes? (4) Product dimensions,
which are: How is the achievement of Indonesian Paralympic athlete?
2. Evaluation
Evaluation is a systematic process to determine or make decisions that a program has
achieved and to collect information about the operation of something, and then the
information is used to determine the right alternative in making decisions. The main
function of evaluation in this case is to provide useful information for the decision
maker to determine the policy to be taken based on the evaluation that has been done.
Similarly, as stated by Surla (2012), that evaluation research aims to collect
metadata to initiate improvement or follow-up of a treatment, "In order to evaluate
scientific and research results, it is necessary to collect metadata on these results at the
beginning". Added by Rosseau (2012) that "the main purpose of evaluation is the
strengths and weaknesses of different indicators" suggests that evaluation serves to
highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different indicators. Rousseau continues his
revelation with the results of the evaluation may differ according to the indicator used
"evaluated for different purposes, and hence the results of such evaluation exercises can be quite
different depending on the indicator(s) used .
Various definitions of evaluation can also be obtained from experts such as
Daniel Stufflebeam (2014). This states that evaluation as a process of approval such as
trust, effectiveness, efficiency, security and honesty. Evaluation gives the public a
confirmation of the improving accountability values or something that can be justified.
In the evaluation process, there are various assessment models to facilitate the
evaluation performance. Several kinds of evaluation research models according to some
experts, at least there are ten kinds of models, (1) Goal oriented evaluation model,
developed by Tyler. (2) Goal free evaluation model, developed by Scriven. (3)
Formative summative evaluation model, developed by Scriven, (4) Countenance
evaluation model, developed by Stake. (5) Responsive evaluation model, developed by
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
106
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
Stake. (6) CSE-UCLA Evaluation Model, which emphasizes the "when" evaluation is
performed. (7) CIPP Evaluation Model, developed by Stufflebeam. (8) Discrepancy
model, developed by Provus, (9) Kirkpartick model, and logic model (logic model).
From the 10 models, the researchers tried to study more deeply to obtain one
evaluation model that fits according to the problem of the study. Based on the
characteristics of the evaluation model as described earlier, the CIPP Evaluation Model
was chosen to evaluate the program in this study. The advantages of this evaluation can
evaluate the program to the stage of product and external factors; short-term, medium,
and long-term outcomes. The evaluation model is a simple way to conceptualize the
actual steps in the evaluation process. The CIPP model from Stufflebeam (2007) defines
evaluation as the process of describing, obtaining and providing useful information for
assessing decision making alternatives, providing understanding, defining, explaining
and focusing information needed by decision makers.
The CIPP evaluation model can be used to improve the improvement of a
program that needs to be implemented. More details Stufflebeam (2014) explains that
context evaluation is used to identify the strength of objects such as an institution, or
programs that will be used for improvement. While for input, evaluation is related to
the basic capital approach that will be used to support the training process. The process
is the implementation of the program in accordance with detailed plans and input
resources and implementation of process effectiveness observation. Medium product is
an achievement of the process that has been implemented that shows the effectiveness
of the use of inputs and processes.
3. Method
This kind of research is an evaluation research, which is getting a thorough review of
Indonesian Paralympic coaching, the evaluation model used is CIPP evaluation model
which consists of: (1) context evaluation, (2) inputs evaluation), (3) process evaluation,
(4) evaluation of the results (product evaluation). The four stages of evaluation at CIPP
are basically the objectives of the evaluation, which are nothing but components of a
program. In other words, the CIPP model is an evaluation model that considers the
evaluated program as a system.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
107
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
Figure 2: Design / Design of CIPP Model Evaluation.
The subject of this research is the National Paralympic Indonesia Board, Athletes
and Trainers who are members of Pelatnas National Paralympic Indonesia in
preparation for Asean Para Games to IX 2017 in Malaysia.
In collecting data, the researchers used various data collection techniques in the
form of interview techniques, questionnaires and document studies. Data collection
techniques can be described as follows:
Table 1: Objects, Data Sources and Data Collection Techniques
Research objects
1. Context component
a.
Organisation and structure of
Data source
Collecting data technique
Athlete, Coach, NPC
Interview, questionnaire,
manager
document study
Athlete, Coach, NPC
Interview, questionnaire,
manager
document study
Athlete, Coach, NPC
Interview, questionnaire,
manager
document study
Athlete, Coach, NPC
Interview, questionnaire,
manager
document study
sport policies
2. Input component
a.
Talent identification and
development system
b.
Financial support
c.
Sport participation
d. Training facilities
3. Process components
a.
Athletic and post athletic career
support
b.
Coaches provision an
development system
c.
Scientific research
4. Product component
a.
National and international
competition
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
108
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
The research instrument is a questionnaire designed to assess the implementation of
Indonesian Paralympic coaching by way of respondents providing feedback statements
on a Likert scale. Respondents determine their level of approval of a statement by
selecting one of the available options. Data analysis is done after the data collection and
data reduction Aare conducted. Analysis of data obtained through questionnaire
conducted by descriptive analysis of respondents' answers and interpret the
respondent's explanation.
The conclusions of each item that are not meet with the criteria will be deepened
through interviews and continued with qualitative analysis. After data collection, then
the next step is to analyze the data. Qualitative data analysis is performed based on the
CIPP evaluation component. Evaluation analysis is done through the following steps: 1)
data collection in accordance with evaluation components, 2) making data displays and
analyzing data by comparing data obtained with predetermined criteria, 3) assessing
and 4) making decisions and making recommendations.
Figure 3: Flow Chart of Data Processing Sequence Process
Flow chart processing data from raw to the formulation of recommendations can
be summarized as follows: (1) raw data from collected instruments processed in the
process of the first stage, namely tabulation; (2) The results of the tabulation process is
useful for the three following processes, though they are not sequentially with them, ie
data analysis, data presentation, and conclusion; (3) The conclusions are based on
material sources from data presentation and tabulation of data; and (4) The final process
of making a recommendation, based on the material source of the conclusion.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
109
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
4. Results and Discussions
4.1 Context Evaluation
Table 2: The Result of Context Evaluation
Indicators
Results
Having a strong legal basis and policies about Paralympic sports Indonesia is very
appropriate because the Indonesian Paralympic exercise is based on Law no. 3 of
2005 in the National Sport System and Presidential Regulation of the Republic of
Organisation and
Indonesia Number 15 of 2015 and the Indonesian Paralympic Sports Policy.
structure of sport
Paralympic Indonesia has a vision and mission that is quite clear, vision is a very
policies
crucial thing for an organization to ensure long-term sustainability and success
Objectives and targets are quite clear, the goal is the translation of the mission
statement, which is something that will be achieved or produced within a
predetermined timeframe.
The findings show that Paralympic exercise which already has a strong legal
foundation will facilitate the implementation of the field. However, it is basically a
government effort to make all parties have a strategic role to improve the achievement
of Indonesian sports. This is considered very necessary because the pattern of sports
coaching is a shared responsibility.
In the vision of an organization must be included the organization values,
aspirations and needs of the future. The characteristics of an effective vision must be
imagined, desirable, feasible, focused, flexible, and communicable. From the vision
made by NPC Indonesia, it can be concluded that the characteristics of imagible,
desirable and communicable have not been seen in its implementation related to
equality and balance for the disabled, therefore it is expected that the improvement of
vision leads to the above characteristics. While the mission is the fundamental reason
for the existence of an organization, mission statement must be able to determine the
needs of what is expected by the organization, so the formulation of the mission is a
realization that will make an organization able to produce output that can meet the
needs and expectations of stakeholders. The findings above shows that the socialization
of vision and mission is still lacking because the clarity of vision and mission is still on
the order of the nature of the documentation, not delivered to the managers coaches
and athletes, so the managers, trainers and athletes do not know the existence of vision
and mission. Socialization to the managers, coaches and athletes is not available yet, it is
a strong indication that the vision and mission of Paralympic sports Indonesia is not
known by the trainers and athletes; it will surely impact on the achievement of the
goals. However, in achieving the vision and mission, trainers and athletes should be
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
110
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
included in formulating the vision and mission so that the achievement of the vision
and mission of the program becomes easier.
Goals will guide the formulation of objectives, and activities in order to realize
the mission, so that goals must harmonize and clarify the mission and vision, describe
the program's outcomes and illustrate the clear direction of an organization. While the
objective is a translation of the goals of an organization in the final form and will be
achieved or produced in the period of annual, semiannual or monthly. The goals also
illustrate the things to be achieved through actions taken to achieve the objectives;
therefore, the goals set are expected to focus on the preparation of programs and
activities that are specific, detailed, measurable and achievable. From the findings, the
goals and objectives of Indonesia's Paralympic sports are quite clear and well
documented, but the socialization to the managers, coaches and athletes is still not
optimal, this is reflected from the ignorance of the managers, coaches and athletes
against the goals and objectives to be achieved, Although it has been documented but
socialization details of objectives and targets must be done by the manages to trainers
and athletes.
4.2 Input Evaluation
Table 3: Input Evaluation Results
Indicator
Talent identification and
Results
1.
Profile and process of athlete’s recruitments in accordance with the
2.
Profile and process of coaches’ recruitments in accordance with the
development system
criteria determined by Indonesia Paralympic.
criteria determined by Indonesia Paralympic.
Financial support
Sport participation
Indonesia Paralympic funding system has been fullfiled properly.
1.
The support from government that is kemepora in accordance with
the regulation on Paralympic provisions.
2.
The establishment of good cooperation among stakeholders helps
implementations of the programs.
Training facilities
The availability of adequate infrastructures and means for exercising
Based on the findings shows that the athlete already has special requirements on the
recruitment of athlete candidates, so the requirements for recruitment refer to the
Indonesian Paralympic exercise guidelines in accordance with guidelines of the
recruitment path of Indonesian Paralympic sports athletes. In the recruitment process,
the main thing to be prepared is the conditions that must be met for the prospective
athlete. Another finding, it was revealed that there are athletes who put the proximity
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
111
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
factor with the manager although the process of recruitment has been made through the
selection and has also been implemented well.
Based on the findings, it does not have specific requirements yet on recruiting
candidates for trainers, but within the Indonesian Paralympic exercise guidelines it is
already accommodated, so the requirements for recruitment refer to these guidelines.
The findings of this research shows that the recruitment of trainers are conducted
through appointment, so it needs a further improvement on the recruitment criteria of
trainers in accordance with the sport so that the quality of the trainer is maintained.
In the process of training, the existence of facilities and infrastructure is very
important. This study found that the Paralympic sports facilities and infrastructure of
Indonesia is sufficient, although in the form of quality, it needs to be improved. The
existence of many facilities is assisted by Sebelas Maret University and Surakarta City
Government. Another thing is also the need for renewal of tools that have been old /
less feasible to be replaced with new ones, as well as make efforts to maintain the tool in
a planned and integrated manner as mandated by the National Sports System Act
Article 67 Paragraph 1 that the government, local government and community are
responsible on the planning, procurement, utilization, maintenance and supervision of
sports facilities and infrastructure.
The funding of the Indonesian Paralympic sports program is for indefinite pay
(manager fee, honor coach and assistant coach and athlete's allowance), other
operational items (match costume and training, match shoes and training and matching
and training equipment), material shopping (ATK And others), shopping services
(Accommodation and athletes consumption), other travel expenses (coach transport and
assistant coach, transport try out). The research finds that although funding reporting
has been done by managers, it turns out the accountability process and the rest of the
managers, coaches and athletes do not know, therefore the transparency and
accountability of the Indonesian Paralympic sports funding fund needs to be improved,
as mandated in the Law National Sport System Article 71 Paragraph 1 that management
of sports funds is based on the principles of fairness, efficiency, transparency and public
accountability.
The task of Kemenpora is to formulate, establish and implement the Indonesian
Paralympic sports coaching, develop an annual work plan, facilitate NPC Indonesia,
manage the activities of Paralympic sports Indonesia, maintain the sports achievement,
provide training facilities and infrastructure including board and lodging. The
implementation of facilitated training by the government related to infrastructure and
NPC Indonesia through the facilities and resources of the trainers has resulted a good
coaching, so that the training process can run well.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
112
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
4.3 Evaluation Process
Table 4: Results of Evaluation Process
Indicator
Results
Athletic and post athletic
The aspects of athletes social life coaching, from the respondents showed that
career support
the percentage of the social life support for coaching athletes is 67% (good)
Coaches
provision
an
1.
development system
The exercises implementation is in accordance with stipulated terms
in Indonesia Paralympic.
2.
The aspects of selecting athletes and coaches from respondents can
be explained that model indicators have reached 73% (good)
3.
Training program in accordance with stipulated terms in Indonesia
Paralympic.
4.
Board and loading achievement aspects are 80%, it means there are
still
Scientific research
% from indicator that hasn’t been reached yet.
The proper evaluation and monitoring has not been optimal yet, it doesn’t
appropriate with the stipulated terms of Indonesia Paralympic.
The existing model of Indonesia Paralympic is acceptable to most athletes and
coaches, although there are 27% of respondents which are not suitable. Procedure
indicator with 80% achievement (good) means the selection procedure available in
Indonesia Paralympic can be accepted by most athletes and trainers, From respondents
athletes, selection indicator with achievement 93% (excellent) means the results of
selection on the sport Paralympic Indonesia is acceptable for Athletes.
The findings state that the training program is an early stage that must be
prepared by the board and trainers to implement the training in accordance with the
goals and objectives to be achieved. It starts from the preparation of training programs,
training administration, test and competition schedules and try out. The Indonesian
Paralympic entrepreneurs have made good arrangements, such as making of absences,
training schedules and others, while the coach has made plans in arranging the training
program, the test schedule, the try out and the match.
The exercise runs according to schedule carried out in the morning starting at
07:00 to 10:00 pm and afternoon at 15:00 to 17:30 pm. In this process, it is also equipped
with an exercise program, so the exercise is tailored to the program that has been
prepared even though the program is still not completed yet.
Evaluation process has been done in every training session which aims to make
improvements / improvements physical, technical and mental athletes so as to achieve
the expected goals. Evaluation is an important part of the training process, because
without evaluation it is impossible to know how athletes develop. On the other hand,
monitoring which is also an important part of a program in this regard in Indonesian
paralympic sports has not been carried out continuously. Revealed monitoring from the
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
113
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
board is very rarely done, this can impact badly on the training process. Monitoring is
also an attempt to exercise control and motivation for athletes, as there is some kind of
concern from the board to the kerjan as an athlete. Therefore, monitoring should be
done in a planned and continuous manner.
Results of data analysis of athlete respondents showed that the percentage of
achievement for food aspect was 80% (good), thus need to look for solution for food
factor to be paid attention especially related to nutrition requirement, so that energy
requirement and supplement for compensation from exercise (adaptation) High
exercise and impact on the acceleration of achievement. Achievement for lodging is 80%
(good), it means that Paralympian rooms should be upgraded, because comfort at rest is
an athlete's requirement. With adequate rest means, the process of adaptation and over
compensation effect of the exercise process can run quickly and perfectly.
Still athlete's high hope that has not been fulfilled, this can impact on psychic
factors, especially the peace of life in relation to family and community life without
worrying with his profession as an athlete, who continue to think that later in the post
as welfare athletes are not guaranteed.
4.4 Product Evaluation
The product evaluation is intended to evaluate the achievement and welfare of
Paralympians and trainers. Achievements at Southeast Asia, Asia and Paralympic levels
are in an upward trend. Indonesia Paralympic won the second rank at the level of
Southeast Asia in 2011, and then won the 1st rank in 2013, and in 2015 it won the second
rank. At the level of Asia, Indonesia Paralympic won the 21st rank, yet in 2012, it turned
out to be 9th rank, and at Paralympic it successfully won the silver medal for table
tennis category.
In the product, evaluation related to the welfare of athletes is significantly
improved economically. The athletes with disabilities are some who are appointed as
civil servants and have businesses that can sustain the lives of their families.
Meanwhile, the most prominent thing is the realization of equality which becomes the
vision of the NPC Indonesia through the equalization of the bonus between Asean Para
Games and the Asean Games athletes in the same venue.
Based on the above findings and discussions, it is found that among the
components which have been evaluated, there is a system interconnected with one
another. All components of context, inputs, processes, and products are important
elements in the implementation of a program. Ideally, the above four components must
be good in order to produce an achievement. If one of components is wrong and does
not work properly, then it will definitely affect the results to be achieved. Therefore, in
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
114
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
running the program we should pay attention to these four components to be managed,
so that the objectives of the program can be achieved.
5. Conclusion
Based on the evaluation done by using context model, input, process and product
toward Indonesia Paralympic it can be drawn into conclusions, as follows:
1. Context Evaluation
a. Indonesia Paralympic has a strong and valid legal force in accordance
with the provisions of the applicable Law in Indonesia Indonesia’s
Paralympic improves the performance of athletes at the International
level,
Indonesia's
Paralympic
becomes
the
acceleration
of
the
achievement of Indonesian sports achievement.
b. Indonesia’s Paralympic has consistency among the vision, mission and
goals of NPC Indonesia on the realization of equality and balance in the
pattern of athlete coaching that is achieving at the International level.
2. Input Evaluation
a. Percentage indicator characteristic of athletes of Paralympic sport by 81%,
is very good category. But there are still unfinished shortcomings in the
characteristics of Paralympic athletes.
b. The percentage of achievement for the coach characteristics aspect of 83%,
is a one-off category. But there are still unfinished shortcomings in the
characteristics of Indonesian Paralympic sports coaches.
c. Percentage of achievement for organizational characteristic is 86%, is good
category. But there is still a shortage in the organizing system in
Indonesia's Paralympic sport that needs to be improved.
d. Percentage of achievement for characteristic aspects of facilities and
infrastructure support to Paralympic sport by 80%, is good category. But
the
factors
of
training,
availability,
quantity,
availability,
and
construction of facilities and infrastructure have not been fully
compatible with Paralympic Indonesia's sport.
e. Percentage of achievement for funding characteristic aspect of 75%, is
good category. But there is still some funding support that has not been
done well in Paralympic sport Indonesia.
3. Process Evaluation
a. Percentage of achievement for athlete and trainer selection aspect is 79%
which means it is a good category. However, the model selection factor,
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
115
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
the selection procedure, and the screening organizer have not been fully
in line with the demands of Indonesia Paralympic.
b. Percentage of achievement for training evaluation aspect is 78% that is in
good category. However, evaluation model factors, evaluation timing,
administration of training evaluation results, and follow-up evaluation
results have not been fully in line with the demands of Indonesia
Paralympic.
c. Percentage of achievement for training and match equipment support
aspect is 81% that is in good category. However, the support of training
equipment and matches on Indonesia Paralympic has not been done as
prescribed in Indonesia Paralympic.
d. Percentage of achievement for board and loading support aspect is 80%
that is in good category. But the achievement for the aspects of
consumption, lodging, lighting room has not been fully met according to
Indonesia Paralympic.
4. Product Evaluation
a. Indonesian Paralympic athletes are able to achieve the achievements that
are proven through the increase of medals in the Asean Para Games,
Asian Games and Paralympic events.
b. The prosperities of athletes are increased and there are vivid equality
among Indonesian Paralympic athletes and non-disabled / normal
athletes.
6. Suggestions
Based on the conclusion of the research which has been mentioned above, the
researcher suggests things as follows:
1. Refining the unfilled shortcomings of the characteristics of Indonesian
Paralympic athletes.
2. Refining the unfinished shortcomings in the characteristics of Indonesian
Paralympic trainers.
3. Improving the organizing system on Indonesia Paralympic.
4. Increasing the support of Indonesia Paralympic facilities and infrastructures.
5. Increasing the acceleration of disbursing financial support process for Indonesia
Paralympic from the government.
6. Refining the selection models, screening procedures, and screening organizers in
accordance with the demands of Indonesian Paralympic.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
116
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
7. Conducting evaluation, administering the results of exercise evaluation, and
follow-up evaluation results in accordance with the demands of Indonesia
Paralympic exercise.
8. Improving the facilitation of training and game equipment support.
9. Improving the board and loading support services on Indonesia Paralympic.
10. Forming the central organization of Indonesia Paralympic.
11. Implementing the cadreization of Indonesian Paralympic athletes in accordance
with the criteria.
Bibliography
1. Agus Kristiyanto. (2012). Pembangunan Olahraga untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat
dan Kejayaan Bangsa. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
2. Alkin, Marvin C, (2011). Evaluation Essentials. New York: The Guilford Press, A.
Division of Guilford Publications, Inc.
3. Alman. (2014.) Evaluasi Program Indonesia Emas. Desertasi. Universitas Negeri
Jakarta. Jakarta
4. Balyi, Istvan. (2013). Sport System Building and Long-term Athlete Development
in British Colombia. Canada: Sport Med BC.
5. Baker Joseph et al. (2012). Talent Identification and Development in Sport.
Routledge Taylor & Friends Group London and New York.
6. Baa, Jossey. New Directions for evaluation. A Publishing unit of john Wiley and
sons. No. 89 2011.
7. Belia Méndez Rial, José María Cancela Carral. (2015). Quality Management of
Olympic, Non-Olympic and Paralympic Sport Federations. Journal of Sports
Research ISSN(e): 2410-6534/ISSN(p): 2413-8436. Facultade de Ciencias da
Educación e do Deporte. University of Vigo Campus Pontevedra, Pontevedra,
Spain. Journal homepage: http://www.pakinsight.com.
8. Bidang Penelitian dan pengembangan KONI Pusat. (2014). Analisis Kekuatan,
Tantangan, Peluang dan strategi Indonesia Menyongsing Multi Ajang. Komite
Olahraga Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta.
9. Carlos Montana Hoyos, Lisa Scharoun. (2014). Design for paralympians:
Exploring roles of graphic and industrial design in promoting awareness of
athletes with disabilities. The International journal of design in society.
www.designprinciplesandpratices.com. ISSN: 2325-1328.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
117
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
10. Catherine M. Capio, et al. (2015). Fundamental movement skills training to
promote physical activity in children with and without disability: A pilot study.
Journal of Sport and Health Science 4 (2015) 235e243. www.jshs.org.cn.
11. Coaching athletes with a disability – How to be better coach. (2015). Coaching
Association of Canada.
12. Cresswell, J.W. (2010). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Approaches. Third Edition. CAL: Sage Publication.
13. Darcy, Simon. (2012). Paralympic Legacy Learning from Sydney 2000 to Prepare
for Tokyo 2020. Journal of Nippon Foundation Paralympic Research Group vol 4.
14. David Carless, Andrew C. Sparkes, Kitrina Douglas, Carlton Cooke. (2014).
Disability, inclusive adventurous training and adapted sport Two soldiers’
stories of involvement. Leeds Metropolitan University, Fairfax Hall, Headingley
Campus, Leeds LS6 3QS, UK Contents lists available at Science Direct
Psychology
of
Sport
and
Exercise
journal
homepage:
www.elsevier.com/locate/psychsport.
15. Deborah R. Shapiro, Jeffery J. Martin. (2014). The relationships among sport selfperceptions and social well-being in athletes with physical disabilities.
Department of Kinesiology and Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA,
USA. Wayne State University, USA. Disability and Health Journal 7 (2014) 42e48.
www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com.
16. De Bosscher Veerle & Jenniver Wong. (2012). Sport Policy Effectiveness in
Disability Sport (SPEDS). A Four Year International Comparative Research
project. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
17. _________________________________. (2014). Sport policy effectiveness in
disability sport (speds). Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
18. Donna de Haan. (2015). Evaluating the experience of the Olympic and
Paralympic games in the career histories of elite equestrian athletes. Submitted in
partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of
Loughborough University.
19. Emzir. (2010). Metodologi Peneitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Jakarta: Raja
Grafindo.
20. Farsi, Mitra & Sharif, Maryam.
. Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model & Program
Theory: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Language Learning and
Applied Linguistic World. Vol 6 (3), July 2014; 400-406.
21. Forward with purpose a strategic framing document for the Canadian
Paralympic. (2014). Canadian Paralympic committee.
22. Gizem Karakas, Cetin Yaman. (2014). The role of family in motivating the
children with disabilities to do Sport. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
118
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
152 (2014) 426 – 429. A School of Physical Education and Sports, Department of
Recreation, Sakarya 54187, Turkey.
23. Harshit Topno,
Evaluation of training and development: An Analysis of
Various Models , Journal of ”usiness and Management Vol 5 (2) 2012, h. 16-22.
24. Husdarta. (2010). Psikologi Olahraga. Bandung: Alfabeta.
25. IPC International Standard for Athlete Evaluation. (2014). International
Paralympic Committee.
26. Judith Berzen, Yeshayahu. (2012). Evaluating Performance Progression In
Beginner Wheelchair Rugby. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity,
5(1), 53-64. European Federation of Adapted Physical Activity. Israel Sport
Center for the Disabled, Israel. Zinam College for Physical Education and Sport
Science
27. Joan, S. James, “n Evaluation of the Implementation of “spects of The Revised
Jamaican
Primary
Science
Curriculum
and
Enactment
of
Development, Journal of The University of The West Indies, Vol
Professional
,
,
hh.1-2.
28. Joshua Ray Pate. (2012). Exploring a Training Facility for Elite Athletes with
Physical Disabilities: The Case of Lakeshore Foundation. Trace: Tennessee
Research and Creative Exchange. Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
29. Kemenpora. (2010). Panduan Penelitian Evaluasi dan Kebijakan Olahraga.
Jakarta: Kemenpora.
30. Komite Olahraga Nasional Indonesia. (2014). Grand Strategi Pembangunan
Olahraga Prestasi Nasional 2014-2024. PT. Gramedia, Jakarta.
31. ______________________________. (2014). Rencana Strategis (Renstra) Program
Indonesia Emas tahun 2015-2019. Jakarta.
32. Kumpulan Perundang-undangan & Dasar Hukum Keolahragaan Nasional.
(2015). Kemenpora & KONI. Jakarta
33. Laura Misener. (2013). Managing disability sport: From athletes with disabilities
to inclusive organizational perspectives. Contents lists available at Science
Direct.
Sport
Management
Review
journal
homepage:
www.elsevier.com/locate/smr. School of Kinesiology, Western University, 1151
Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6A 5B9, Canada.
34. Legg, David. (2010). Special Report Canadian Sport for Life for Athlete with a
Disability. Calgary, Alberta: Mount Royal University.
35. Long term athlete development Canadian sport for life. (2009). Canadian sport
my live.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
119
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
36. Marvin C. Alkin, Evaluation Roots Tracing Theorists View and Influences
(California: Sage Publications Inc, 2004), h. 34.
37. Mc Cawley, PF. (2013). The Logic Model for Program Planning and Evaluation.
Online
http://www.uiweb.uidaho.edu/extension/logicModel.pdf.
resources
Diunduh 6 April 2016.
38. Massoumi, Hassan et al. (2013) Presentation of a Entropy Decision Making
Pattern to Develop a Comprehensive External Evaluation Model of Sporting
Federations Performance Using Fuzzy approach. World Applied Sciences
Journal 22 (12): 1718-1728, 2013
39. M. David Miller, (2013). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 11th Edition.
University of Florida. ISBN13: 9780132689663
40. Nagoor Meera Abdullah, Kwame Ampofo-Boateng, Rozita Abdul Latif, Hisyam
Che Mat. (2011). Coaching Athletes with Disabilities – Guidelines and Principles
in Training Methodology. Jurnal Media Ilmu Keolahragaan Indonesia. Volume 1.
Edisi 1. Juli 2011. ISSN: 2088-6802. http://journal.unnes.ac.id. Universitas Negeri
Semarang.
41. Nkwake, Apollo M. (2015). Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program
Evaluation Methodology. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
42. Paralympic New Zealand High Performance Plan 2013-2020
43. Patel, Namrata N. (2014). Plyometric Training. International Journal Curriculum
Research Review. Vol. 6 Issue. 15. Agustus 2014.
44. Patton M. Q, (2006). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation, London:
SAGE Publications.
45. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia nomor 22 tahun 2010 tentang Program
Indonesia Emas (PRIMA).
46. Program Pascasarjana, Unesa. (2015). Pedoman Penulisan Tesis dan Disertasi.
Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
47. Radtke, Sabine & Doll-Tepper, Gudrun. (2014). A Cross-cultural Comparison of
talent identification and development in Paralympic Sport. Freie UniversitatBerlin.
48. Rick Cummings.
What if
The Counterfactual in Evaluation Program .
Evaluation Journal Australasia. Vol. 6, Spring 2016, h. 6-15.
49. Rousseau, Ronald. (2012). Journal Evaluation Technical and Practical Issues.
Library Trends. Vol. 50. No. 3, Winter 2002, pp. 418-439.
50. SK KONI Pusat nomor 08/RA/2015 tanggal 31 maret tentang pengunduran diri
NPC Indonesia menjadi anggota KONI.
51. Stufflebeam, Daniel L., Chris L. S. Coryn. (2014). Evaluation, Theory, Models, &
Application. San Francisco: Jossey – Bass A Wiley Brand.
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
120
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
52. Sean M. Tweedy, Gavin Williams, John Bourke. (2010). Selecting And Modifying
Methods Of Manual Muscle Testing For Classification In Paralympic Sport.
European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 3(2), 7-16. European Federation
of Adapted Physical Activity.
53. Shia Ping Kung, Peter Taylor. (2014). The use of public sports facilities by the
disabled in England, Sport Industry Research Centre SIRC . Sheffield Hallam
University, A118 Collegiate Hall, Collegiate Crescent, SheffieldS
”P, UK
Contents lists available at Science Direct. Sport Management Review. Journal
homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/smr.
54. Simon Nathan.
. “thletics “ustralia’s High Performance. Strategic Plan
2013 – 2016.
55. Sudijono, Anas. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
(Rajawali Pers).
56. Tangkudung, James. (2012). Paragames Paralympic. Jakarta: UNJ.
57. Undang-Undang RI. No.3. (2005). Sistem Keolahragaan Nasional, Jakarta:
Kementrian Negara Pemuda Dan Olahraga Republik Indonesia.
58. Whitehead, Ton L. (2015). Cultural Ecology of Health and Change. Maryland:
College Park.
59. www.paralympic.org/indonesia.
60. Yahaya, Azizi. (2012). The using of model CIPP in learning program assessment.
International conference on challenge and prospects in teacher education,
Concorde hotel Shahala.
61. Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., Misulis, K.
(2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP)
as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and
Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach
and Engagement. Vol.15
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
121
Deddy Whinata Kardiyanto, Hari Setijono, Edy Mintarto
THE EVALUATION OF INDONESIA PARALYMPIC COACHING
Creative Commons licensing terms
Authors will retain the copyright of their published articles agreeing that a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) terms
will be applied to their work. Under the terms of this license, no permission is required from the author(s) or publisher for members of the community
to copy, distribute, transmit or adapt the article content, providing a proper, prominent and unambiguous attribution to the authors in a manner that
makes clear that the materials are being reused under permission of a Creative Commons License. Views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this
research article are views, opinions and conclusions of the author(s). Open Access Publishing Group and European Journal of Special Education
Research shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability caused in relation to/arising out of conflict of interests, copyright
violations and inappropriate or inaccurate use of any kind content related or integrated on the research work. All the published works are meeting the
Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and noncommercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 4 │ 2017
122