Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Special Education Research ISSN: 2501 - 2428 ISSN-L: 2501 - 2428 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 2 │ Issue 6 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1133784 INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHERS’ SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS AND EFFICACY FOR INCLUSION Osman Özokcui ‚ssistant Professor, ‚bant İzzet ‛aysal University, Faculty of Education, Special Education Department, Turkey Abstract: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between teachers self-efficacy beliefs and efficacy for inclusion education. Study participants included a total of 1204 teachers taken from preschool, classroom, subject-matter and special-education departments from schools in four different geographical regions of Turkey. Data were collected using the Teachers Sense of Efficacy (TSE) Scale and the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusion Practices (TEI) Scale. The results revealed a significant relationship between the teachers self-efficacy beliefs and efficacy for inclusion. The levels of self-efficacy and efficacy regarding the inclusion of the teachers were higher for female teachers, experienced teachers, teachers who had taken previous courses about special education, and the teachers who have previously interacted with an individual with special needs. In addition, the efficacy level of novice teachers regarding inclusion was found to be higher than that of more experienced teachers. Keywords: inclusive education, self-efficacy belief, inclusion efficacy 1. Introduction At the current time, the process and policy of inclusion are considered to be something of a reform act, one that aims to include all students into the educational system regardless of their individual differences or social backgrounds. It is accepted as a Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 234 Osman Özokcu INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TE‚CHERS SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS AND EFFICACY FOR INCLUSION preferred method regarding the placement of students with special needs (UNESCO, 2009). The inclusion act aims to improve school systems, not only for individuals with special needs, but also for the general population (Ainscow, 2005). Inclusion practices have existed for a long time in developed Western countries; nevertheless, researchers and parents in Turkey have only started focusing on inclusionary practices in education in the last 25 years. In Turkey, Special Education Regulation 573 and the special education services regulation came into effect in 1997 and 2006, respectively with the aim of encouraging inclusive education as well as in many other countries. Consequently, inclusive education practices have accelerated in Turkey as a result (The Ministry of National Education (MoNE), 1997, 2006). Over the last 30 years, there has been changing global perspective regarding the terminology of such education, and the term integration has largely been replaced by the term inclusive for such educational policies and processes ‚vramidis & Norwich, . In Turkey and among Turkish researchers, the term mainstreaming has been used in place of inclusion . Despite the aforementioned legal regulations and policies, inclusion in Turkey has not been widely accepted, nor has it yielded the expected benefits. The reason for this case might stem from the fact that successful inclusive education depends on numerous factors. Among these, teachers are the most important, and have been shown as one of the most basic factors regarding the inclusion of students with special needs (Paneque & Barbetta, 2006; Sharma, Loreman, & Forlin, 2012). Providing an appropriate and effective education for students with special needs within inclusive environments is dependent on many factors. Teachers self-efficacy beliefs are among the most important factors determining the success of an inclusive practice (Jordan, Schwartz, & McGhie-Richmond, 2009; Paneque & Barbetta, 2006; Sharma, et al., 2012). Self-efficacy belief is an important phenomenon in social learning theory; it can be defined as one s belief in their capacity to organize those activities and actions necessary to display a particular performance and to do so successfully ‛andura, 4 . ‚ccording to ‛andura , one s self-perception of efficacy has an important role to play regarding their preferences; self-efficacy beliefs direct an individual s behavior. Teacher self-efficacy, on the other hand, is defined as teachers self-confidence or thought regarding the provision of an effective education for their students Guskey & Passaro, 1994). Tschannen-Moran and Woolfolk Hoy (2001) provide a different definition, and assert that teacher self-efficacy is a teacher s belief regarding their capability to perform effectively within the teaching profession. Therefore, teachers perceptions of their capabilities are assumed to be one of the important factors affecting European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 6 │ 2017 235 Osman Özokcu INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TE‚CHERS SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS AND EFFICACY FOR INCLUSION teaching practices. Teachers self-efficacy beliefs affect their teaching quality, teaching methods and techniques used, students participation in learning, and students comprehension of teaching, all of which determine students success. Well-educated preservice teachers are expected to promote self-efficacy before anything else, while teachers with a low and high self-efficacy are different in terms of their classroom management skills, utilization of different methods, and provision of feedback for students with learning difficulties; these differences have been reported as impacting students motivation and achievement Yılmaz, Köseoğlu, Gerçek, & Soran, 4. Those teachers who believe that effective teaching can influence learning, and who are confident in their teaching abilities can persevere for longer and provide different types of feedback for their students. Some researchers have suggested that a positive relationship exists between a teachers confidence in their teaching abilities positive perceptions/beliefs regarding their capabilities and their or their students achievement levels, motivation, and efficacy. Furthermore, it has been suggested that self-efficacy belief is one of the most important predictors of teacher efficacy (Güvenç, ; Palmer, ; Tekkaya, Çakıroğlu, & Özkan, ; Yılmaz et al., 4. According to the available literature, a strong relationship exists between teachers self-efficacy perceptions and students academic achievement Woolfolk, . Teachers with a high self-efficacy perceptions employ different types of behavior-management skills, perform more practical activities, and use more effective teaching methods (Jordan, Glenn, & McGhie-Richmond, 2010; Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk-Hoy, . Other studies on teachers self-efficacy perceptions revealed that teachers with a high full self-confidence or self-efficacy perception are more eager to meet students needs and seek out new approaches and methods (Stein & Wang, 1988); use more effective classroom management skills (Emmer & Hickman, 1991); allocate more time for problematic students (Gibson & Dembo, 1984); prefer not to direct such students to special education centers (Sodak & Podell, 1993a); and attempt to spend more time with students with learning difficulties (Gibson & Dembo, 1984). Teachers self-efficacy belief has a significant influence on their success in performing inclusion practices (Paneque & Barbetta, 2006; Sharma, et al., 2012). Successful teaching in an inclusive classroom is dependent on teachers beliefs regarding the responsibilities and needs of students with special needs (Jordan, et al., 2009). Other studies have reported findings suggesting that teachers with a higher level of self-efficacy belief used more effective teaching strategies and were more insistent in educating those students with lower levels of interest towards academic activities. Contrary to this situation, teachers with a lower level of self-efficacy have been reported as spending more time on non-academic works and inhibiting students learning by European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 6 │ 2017 236 Osman Özokcu INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TE‚CHERS SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS AND EFFICACY FOR INCLUSION using ineffective teaching methods (Savolainen, Engelbrecht, Nel, & Malinen, 2011; Sharma, et al., 2012). Previous research on the self-efficacy of general-education teachers in inclusive classrooms revealed that these individuals self-efficacy was related to them being more open toward inlusion (Meijer & Foster, 1988; Sodak & Podell, 1993a; Soodak & Podell, 1993b; Soodak, Podell & Lehman, 1998). Additionally, teachers high self-efficacy belief towards inclusion has been reported holding a relationship to more positive attitudes regarding inclusion (Weisel & Dror, 2006), being more sensitive towards students with special needs (Soodak, Podell, & Lehman 1998), their perceived success regarding the effective teaching of students with special needs in the general education classrooms (Brownell & Pajares, 1999), and their pupils being able to deal with their own problems more effectively (Almong & Shechtman, 2007). Similarly, researchers found out that training on the education of students with special needs within integration classrooms significantly increased teachers efficacy towards inclusion Chao, Forlin, & Ho, ; Forlin & Chambers, 2011; Oswald & Swart, 2011; Sharma, Shaukat, & Furlonger, 2015). In Turkey, many studies on teacher efficacy have been conducted and the results of these studies have mainly focused on general and science education (Ekici, 2006; Çakiroglu, Çapa, & Sarikaya, 2004; Savran, Çakiroglu, & Çakiroglu, 4; Yılmaz et al., 2004). Conversely, studies regarding the determination of self-efficacy beliefs of teachers in the special education field in Turkey remain limited. When the results of such studies are investigated, special education teachers are seen to perceive themselves as more efficient in working with children with mental disabilities when compared to general-education teachers (Diken & Özokçu, 2004). Pre-service teachers have also been found to have generally positive views towards the inclusion of children with intellectual disabilities (Diken, 2006), while a significant relationship has been found to exist between pre-service teachers perception of self-efficacy beliefs and inclusive education efficacy Dolapçı & Yıldız Demirtaş, ; a significant relationship between the self-efficacy of classroom teachers and their efficacy towards inclusive education has also been reported (Toy & Duru, 2016). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs are considered to be an important factor influencing teaching practices in inclusive education, as well as an important factor influencing positive teacher attitudes towards students with special needs. ‚dditionally, teachers self-confidence sentiments of teachers regarding self-efficacy perceptions and their working with students with special needs directly affect inclusion education success. This highlights the importance of determining the inclusion education teachers general self-efficacy and their integration self-efficacy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the relationship, if any, between the teachers general self-efficacy beliefs and European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 6 │ 2017 237 Osman Özokcu INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TE‚CHERS SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS AND EFFICACY FOR INCLUSION their efficacy towards inclusive education, as well as to investigate whether or not their self-efficiency and integration efficiency levels show significant differences in terms of certain demographic variables. This study aims to answer the following research questions: 1. Is there a significant relationship between teachers self-efficacy beliefs and their efficacy regarding inclusion? 2. Do teachers general-efficacy beliefs and their level of efficacy regarding inclusive education vary according to certain variables such as gender, occupational experience, the statuses of interacting with individuals with special needs, and taking courses about special education? For viewing / downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejse/article/view/1324 European Journal of Special Education Research - Volume 2 │ Issue 6 │ 2017 238