Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Social Sciences Studies ISSN: 2501-8590 ISSN-L: 2501-8590 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/soc Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.852536 STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTION TOWARDS ABOLITION OF RANKING OF STUDENTS AND SCHOOLS IN NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KENYA: A CASE OF WEST POKOT COUNTY Joyline Limangurai, Lelan Joseph K., Kyalo Benjamin Wambua Department of Educational Management and Policy Studies, School of Education, Moi University, Kenya Abstract: The government of Kenya abolished ranking among schools in the year 2014, which took effect from the year 2015. This was put in place in order to eliminate cut-throat competition among institutions and to end unethical practices by teachers in the rush for top positions. Abolition of ranking in West Pokot drew different reactions and perspectives from different stakeholders of education. The study examined stakeholders perception towards abolition of ranking on students and schools in national examination in Secondary schools in Kenya. The objectives of the study were; to determine stakeholders perception on ranking of schools, to determine how ranking of school affected students commitment to academic performance, the impact of secondary school ranking on the parental commitment on students academic matters and how ranking of schools influenced ministry of education officials and county officials commitment to academic activities. The research design adopted in this study was cross sectional descriptive survey. Cluster sampling (probability sampling) and non-probability (purposive sampling) techniques were adopted to determine sample size. Questionnaire and interview guides were employed in data collection. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (chi-square) were adopted for quantitative data analysis. Qualitative data were categorized and analysed according to themes. Theoretical framework was based and guided by Talcott Persons Structural Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 80 Joyline Limangura, Lelan Joseph K., Kyalo Benjamin Wambua STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTION TOWARDS ABOLITION OF RANKING OF STUDENTS AND SCHOOLS IN NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KENYA: A CASE OF WEST POKOT COUNTY Functionalism Theory. In the conceptual framework, the independent variable in this research is the stakeholders perception, while the dependent is the result of abolition. Findings from the study indicated that abolition of ranking had a lot of negative outcomes compared to positive effects and the decision be reverted for better results in our schools. The study concluded that, ranking motivates teachers to cover syllabus, change institutional practices, makes them focus their teaching activities towards examination neglecting other aspects of education but has no impact on their selfesteem. It also encourages completion among departments but can lead to unhealthy competition among different categories of schools. However, ranking leads to narrowing of curriculum and encourage malpractices in national examination. On students commitment on academic performance, ranking acts as motivating factor to performing students but might destroy morale to underperforming ones. Students however become less concerned with performance when ranking is abolished. Abolition of ranking influences parents to buy extra teaching and learning materials. It also impacts negatively on parental involvement on school academic programs but does not influence parental support for homework. Abolition of ranking impacts negatively on ministry of education officials commitment of academic matters at it affects their involvement in issues like resource allocations. The study recommends that; the decision of abolishing of ranking by government should be reverted or should be practiced by schools at different levels, it should also be done continuously throughout the academic year to get trends of performance and schools should provide psychological support to all students especially underperforming ones. Education stakeholders should define measures to curb malpractices in examination among students and students and not to just abolish ranking. Keywords: ranking, examinations, performance, perception, abolition 1. Introduction In the United States, teachers unions, school leaders, principals and teachers have tended to oppose policies linking assessment to accountability on the grounds of perverse effects including narrowing the curriculum to the practice of teaching to the test and incentives for teachers to cheat (Evers & Walberg, 2003). Evidence suggests that agencies alter the timing of their actions and engage in cream skimming in response to specific performance measures (Hickman, Henrick & Smith, 2002). They exclude weak students from sitting for examinations. Cheating was mentioned as another unproductive type of response to accountability incentives and misreporting of school European Journal of Social Sciences Studies - Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 81 Joyline Limangura, Lelan Joseph K., Kyalo Benjamin Wambua STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTION TOWARDS ABOLITION OF RANKING OF STUDENTS AND SCHOOLS IN NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KENYA: A CASE OF WEST POKOT COUNTY dropout rates (Peabody& Markley, 2003). Schools also excluded weak students by engaging in cream skimming at the point of admission. This is because the higher the ability of students admitted, the better the output and the higher the schools relative position in the league tables (Wilson, 2001). Performance tables for England have been published annually since 1992 (Wilson, 2003). Currently they are used to describe the difference between materials brought in and the finished product and thus measures the value added by the production process (Wilson, 2003). However, other studies indicate that, despite the use of league tables in Kenya, Senegal and elsewhere, several factors indicate that their use is complicated and misleading. If students differ from school to school in their level of achievement when joining the schools, a measure of achievement at a later date that does not take this into account will be inequitable and misleading in that it will not adequately reflect a schools success in moving students from their initial entry level to their present level of achievement as reflected in a public examination (Kellaghan & Greaney, 2001). For downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/soc/index.php/EJSSS/article/view/179 European Journal of Social Sciences Studies - Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 82