Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Social Sciences Studies ISSN: 2501-8590 ISSN-L: 2501-8590 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/soc Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1038516 DOES CHANGE IN PRICE LEVEL AID INDUSTRIAL SECTOR PRODUCTIVITY IN NIGERIA? Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu1i, Gabriel A. Anidiobu2, Paschal I. P. Okolie3 Department of Banking and Finance, 1 Caritas University, Enugu, Nigeria Department of Banking & Finance, 2 Enugu State University of Science & Technology, Enugu, Nigeria Office of the Accountant General, Treasury House, State Secretariat, Enugu, Nigeria 3 Abstract: This goal of this study is to assess the effect of inflation on industrial output in Nigeria using annual data from 1982 to 2015. The error correction model (ECM) was employed to estimate the short-run and long-run dynamics, while the Engel and Granger residualbased technique for cointegration was employed to test for long-run relationship. The Findings revealed that inflation, official exchange rate and real interest rate had negative effects on Nigeria’s industrial output. A unit change in inflation rate and real interest rates brought about 9.2% and 3.3% decline in industrial output respectively. When however the broad money supply increased by 1%, industrial sector value added increased by 23.7%. Growth in broad money supply was however found to have significant positive effect on industrial production over the period. Based on the ECM, the study found that the last period’s deviation from long-run equilibrium is corrected at the speed of 62.7% annually. We recommend that policymakers should take steps towards attaining price level stability while encouraging lower cost of borrowing for the industrial sector. JEL: C22, E63, L60 Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 287 Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu, Gabriel A. Anidiobu, Paschal I. P. Okolie DOES CHANGE IN PRICE LEVEL AID INDUSTRIAL SECTOR PRODUCTIVITY IN NIGERIA? Keywords: industrial output, inflation, broad money supply, error correction model 1. Introduction The industrial sector remains a major driver of economic growth (Aiyegbusi, 2016), and inflations is a key determinant of industrial sector performance (Otalu and Anderu, 2015) alongside such other factors as exchange rate, technological intensity, personal consumption, investment level etc (Tkalec and Vizek (2009). (Saritha, et al., (2015) maintains that inflation affects index of industrial production, and reduces manufacturing output (Siyakiya, 2013; Bans-Akutey, et al., 2016; Modebe and Ezeaku, 2016). For most jurisdictions, attaining sustainable economic growth and stability in general price level remain the core objective of macroeconomic policies. In recent time, the debate on whether inflation is detrimental or necessary to growth continues to draw opinions from policymakers and the academia. A good number of studies establish that inflation is inversely related with economic growth, thereby inferring that inflation is harmful to economic growth Madurapperuma (2016). It is based on this theoretical position in literature that monetary policies of most countries are targeted at achieving price stability and promoting economic growth Mwakanemela (2013). Some other school of thought argues that inflation is necessary for the attainment of economic growth, which implies that inflation have positive or direct relationship with economic growth (Ahmad &Joyia, 2012; Majumder, 2016; Lu., et al., 2016). Literally, there is no consensus as to what nature of relationship exists between inflation and growth. Empirical and theoretical studies that examined the linkages between the two variables have always come up with differing positions. The structuralists are of the opinion that inflation has a positive effect on economic growth while the monetarists contend that inflation is inimical to economic growth. From the neo classical view point, inflation stimulates economic growth by favouring the capitalists with shift in income distribution, and the resulting increases in savings boost investment which translates into economic growth. The age long stand point of the Keynesians is that inflation could increase economic growth by raising the profit level, thereby increasing rate of private investment. However, other theories argue that high inflation reduces investment level which consequently stifles economic growth (Mamo, 2012). There has also been even more controversies surrounding the predicting power of inflation for economic growth, and the forecasting power of the latter for the former. This sort of relation is called causal relationship. The causal relationship between inflation and economic growth has been contentious. Methodically, the granger European Journal of Social Sciences Studies - Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 288 Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu, Gabriel A. Anidiobu, Paschal I. P. Okolie DOES CHANGE IN PRICE LEVEL AID INDUSTRIAL SECTOR PRODUCTIVITY IN NIGERIA? causality examines whether one indicator is granger causal for the other. For instance, if inflation is granger caused economic growth, it means inflation contains information that helps to predict future economic growth and vice versa. Such predictability power of one variable for the other may take different directions. Previous empirical studies reveal a bi-directional causality, a uni-directional causality and no causality between economic growth and inflation (Jayathileke, et al., 2013). Denbel and Ayen (2016) found uni-directional causality in Ethiopia running from economic growth to inflation. Same was the indication in Pakistan (Ahmad & Joyia, 2012). Singh and Singh (2016) contend that there exist bi-directional causality between economic growth and inflation in the case of Japan. While there is unidirectional causality between economic growth and inflation in the context of India, a bi-directional causality is the case in China (Behera and Kumar, 2016). Evidently, there is no clear cut decision about the growth-inflation relation. We attempt in this study to explore the underlying relation between economic growth and inflation in Nigeria between the period 1960 and 2014. Most studies on this subject often adopt a relatively short period. We therefore try to increase the coverage period while employing varied econometric techniques to evaluate economic growth and inflation nexus. For viewing / downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/soc/index.php/EJSSS/article/view/231 European Journal of Social Sciences Studies - Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 289