Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Social Sciences Studies ISSN: 2501-8590 ISSN-L: 2501-8590 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/soc doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1049127 Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 THE RESPONSIVENESS OF STOCK PRICES TO DIVIDEND YIELD: THE CASE OF LISTED NIGERIAN DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS Godwin Imo Ibei Department of Banking and Finance College of Management Sciences Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike Abia State, Nigeria Abstract: This study examines the impact of dividend on stock prices. The study adopts the expost facto research design and data were handpicked from the annual report and statement of account of selected banks listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange for the period. The findings of this study support the opposite view that dividend yields do not have positive and significant impact on stock prices. This implies that stock prices tend to increase when an increase in dividend is announced but tend to decrease when a decrease or omission is announced. Keywords: dividend, stock price, bank size 1. Introduction The subject matter of dividend policy remains one of the most controversial issues in corporate finance. For a very long time now, financial economists have engaged in modeling and examining corporate dividend policy as they affect banks stock prices in Nigeria (Amidu, 2007). Black (1976) hinted that, the harder we look at the dividend picture, it seems like a puzzle with pieces that don’t fit together . Since the pioneering work of MM in 1963, there have been vast amount of literature examining dividend policy. Thus, Frankfurter and Wood (2002) concluded in the same vein as Black and Scholes (1974) that the dividend puzzle , both as a share value-enhancing feature and as a matter of policy, is one of the most challenging topics of modern financial economics. Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 320 Godwin Imo Ibe THE RESPONSIVENESS OF STOCK PRICES TO DIVIDEND YIELD: THE CASE OF LISTED NIGERIAN DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS More than half a century of research has not been able to resolve it. Research no dividend policy and earnings have shown not only that a general theory of dividend policy remains elusive, but also that corporate dividend practice varies over time, among firms and across countries. The patterns of corporate dividend policies not only vary over time but also across countries, especially between developed and emerging financial institutions. Supporting this argument is Huda and Farah (2011) pointed out that dividend policy has been issues of interest in financial literature; academics and researchers have developed many theoretical models describing the factors that managers should consider when making dividend policy decisions. Key factors behind the dividend decision have been studied by numerous researchers. Lintner (1956) suggested that dividend payment pattern of a firm is influenced by the current year earnings and previous year dividends. In this case, dividend may be seen as the free cash flows which comprises of cash remaining after all business expenses have been met (Damodaran, 2002). The dividend decision in corporate finance is a decision made by the directors of a company. It relates to the amount and timing of any cash payments made to the company’s stockholders. The decision as stated by Pandey (2005), is an important one for the firm as it may influence the financial structure and stock price of the firm. In addition, the decision may determine the amount of taxations that stockholders pay. The dividend payment ratio is a major aspect of the dividend policy of the firm, which affects the value of the firm to the shareholders (Litzenberger and Ramaswany, 1982). The classical school of thought holds this view and they believe that dividends are paid to influence their share prices. They also believe that market price of an equity is a representation of the present value of estimated cash dividends that can be generated by the equity (Gordon, 1959). Another classical school of thought, on the other hand, believes that the price of equity is a function of the earnings of the company. They believe that dividend payout is irrelevant to evaluating the worth of equity. What matters, they say is earnings (Miller and Modigliani, 1961). Mayo (2008: 364-365) observed that retained earnings provide funds to finance the firms on long term growth. It is the most significant source of financing a firm’s investment. Dividends are paid in cash, thus the distribution of earnings utilizes the available cash of the company. When the firm increases the retained portion on net earnings, shareholders’ current income in the form of dividends decreases, but the use of retained earnings to finance profitable investments is expected to increase future earnings. On the other hand, when dividends increase, shareholders’ current income will increase but the firm may be unable to retain earnings and, thus, relinquish possible investment opportunities and future earnings. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies - Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 321 Godwin Imo Ibe THE RESPONSIVENESS OF STOCK PRICES TO DIVIDEND YIELD: THE CASE OF LISTED NIGERIAN DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS The theoretical rationale for corporate dividend policy has been an important topic in corporate finance for a very long time. Three main factors may influence a firm’s dividend decision. These are: - Free cash flows, Dividend clientele and Information signaling (Pandey, 2005). Under the free-cash flow theory of dividends, the payment of dividends is very simple: the firm simply pays out, as dividend, any surplus cash after it invests in all available positive net present value projects. Criticism of the theory is that it does not explain the observed dividend policies of real world companies. Most companies pay relatively consistent dividend from one year to the next and managers tend to prefer to pay a steadily increasing dividend rather than paying dividend that fluctuates dramatically from one year to the next. These criticisms have led to the development of other models that seek to explain the dividend decision (Brigham, 1995). For viewing / downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/soc/index.php/EJSSS/article/view/245 . European Journal of Social Sciences Studies - Volume 2 │ Issue 7 │ 2017 322