THE APPLICATION OF MURDER LEARNING MODEL AND EFFECT ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

A. Andriyadi, S. Sukidjo

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the differences in learning outcomes between students learning with the MURDER learning model and students who take conventional learning, namely lecturing on. This type of research used is the quasi-experimental design with the research design used Posttest-Only Control. The study population was grade VIII students at MTs. Darun Najah Al-Falah Telaga Waru West Lombok, Indonesia. The sample in this study were students of grade VIII totaling 40 people. The sampling technique used cluster sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. The learning outcome data were collected using a multiple-choice test instrument with a total of 20 questions. Based on the results of the data analysis, the results of tcount = 2.102 and ttable = 1.686 at the 5% significance level, which means tcount>ttable. The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences in learning outcomes between students using the MURDER learning model and students using conventional learning models. From the results of descriptive statistical analysis, it is known that the mean value of the experimental group is 64.5 and the mean value of the control group is 57.25. This means that the average score in the experimental group is greater than the average score in the control group, so it can be concluded that learning using the MURDER learning model has an effect on student learning outcomes.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


MURDER, mood, understand, recall, digest, expand, review, learning outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar, M. (2018). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Berata, I. N., Kusmariyatni, N. N., & Widiana, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh Model Cooperative Learning Type Murder with Metacognitive Scaffolding (Clmms) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Kelas V Sd. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v1i1.834

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: David Mc Key.

Fathurrahman, M. (2015). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Jogjakarta: Arruz Media.

Ferazona, S. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Penggunaan Strategi Active Sharing Knowledgeupaya Mempersiapkan Generasi Abad 21. Perspektif, XI(1).

Hamalik, O. (2015). Proses BelajarMengajar. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Harahap, N. A., Ummah, K., Rohanawati, A. N., &Mardhatillah, S. R. (2019). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Student Center Learning (SCL) BerbasisAktivitas Pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Pancasila Di Fakultas Hukum. 1(2), 182–197.

Harjali. (2009). Penataan Lingkungan Belajar: Strategi untuk Guru dan Sekolah. Malang: CV Seribu Bintang.

Hayes, J. R. (1981). The Complete Problem Solver. Pennsylvania: Institute Press Philadelphia.

Lindgren, H. C. (1976). Lindgren, H. C., Educational Psychology in The Classroom, 6th ed (6th ed.). New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Musfah, J. (2018). Manajemen Pendidikan Aplikasi, Strategi, dan Inovasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Permatahati, D. R., & Wangid, M. N. (2019). The Application of Murder Model with Image Media to Improving Student Learning Outcomes at the Fourth Grade Students. International E-Journal of Educational Studies, 3(6), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.604883

Prashing, B. (2007). The Power of Learning Styles: Mendongkrak Anak Melejitkan Prestasidengan Mengenali Gaya Belajarnya (Kaifa (ed.)). Bandung: Kaifa.

Retnowati, E., Jerusalem, M. A., & Sugiyarto, K. (2018). Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods in Educational Systems. International Conference on Teacher Education and Professional Development.

Rizali, A. (2009). Dari guru konvensionalmenuju guru profesional. Grasindo. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Rohani, A. (2010). PengelolaanPengajaranSebuahPengantarMenuju Guru Profesional. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

S. Bruner, J. (1960). The Processes of education. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Sanjaya, W. (2014). Strategi PembelajaranBerorientasiStandar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Sugiyono (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprijono, A. (2015). Cooperative Learning Teori Dan AplikasiPaikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2013). Menjadi Guru Profesional: Strategi Meningkatkan Kualifikasi dan Kualitas Guru di Era Global. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Tang, S. F., & Lim, C. L. (2018). Preparing the Next Generation of Teachers for 21st Century Education. Igi Global.

UUtami, W. (2019). Peningkatan prestasi belajar ekonomi menggunakan strategi tutor sebaya dan snowball throwing pada peserta didik SMA N 15 Batam tahun pelajaran 2017 / 2018. Jurnal Kiprah, 20, 13–26.

Winkel, W. S. (1989). Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i11.3340

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 A. Andriyadi, S. Sukidjo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).