Hayal Yavuz Mumcu, Tolga Aktürk


The aim of this study is to address and analyse pre-service teachers’ mathematical reasoning skills in relation to mathematical thinking processes. For these purposes, pre-service teachers’ mathematical reasoning skills namely generalising/abstraction/modelling, ratiocination, development and creative thinking skills and the relationships among these skills are examined. Apart from these, it is explored whether grade level and gender have an effect on the application of these skills. The study is based on a mixed method research design and is carried out with 197 pre-service teachers of different grade levels in the school of education of a public university. One of the data collection tools used in the study is mathematical thinking and reasoning skills test which was developed by Başaran (2011) and comprises 21 open-ended questions on real-life problems. The second one is the Mathematical Reasoning Skills and Indicators developed by the researchers in the light of a study by Alkan and Taşdan (2011). Content analysis is performed on the data gathered from the pilot study conducted as the first step of the data analysis and the content of the quantitative data analysis is defined. As the second step, some parametric and non-parametric tests are utilized using the SPSS 15.0 software. As a result of the study, it has been revealed that pre-service teachers’ scores on generalising/abstraction/modelling and ratiocination skills are close to average whereas their scores on development and creative thinking skills are below average. It has also been concluded that all the relationships among pre-service teachers’ reasoning skills are significant and that correlations among the skills which are associated with stages that follow one another are stronger than the others. Another result of the study is that, in relation to the gender variable, there is a significant difference among the scores concerning generalising/abstraction/modelling and ratiocination skills, yet there are not any significant differences among the development and creative thinking skills scores. In relation to the grade variable, on the other hand, there aren’t any significant differences among the scores concerning generalising/abstraction/modelling (GAM) and reasoning (R) and improving (İ) skills, yet there are significant differences among the creative thinking skills scores of freshman and sophomore pre-service teachers and among those of the sophomore and junior pre-service teachers.Results of the present study are discussed in relation to the relevant literature and some recommendations for future studies pertaining to the subject and to learning environment quality are presented.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



mathematical reasoning, mathematical thinking skills, pre-service teachers


Aiken, L. (1986-1987). Sex differences in mathematical ability: a review of the literature. Educational Research Quarterly, 10: 25-35.

Akkus-Çıkla, O., ve Duatepe, A. (2002). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının orantısal akıl yürütme becerileri üzerine niteliksel bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 32-40.

Alkan, H., & Güzel, E. B. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarında matematiksel düşünmenin gelişimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3), 221-236.

Alkan, H., & Taşdan, B. T. (2011). Mathematical thinking through the eyes of prospective mathematics teachers at different grade levels. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education (INUJFE), 12(2), 107-138.

Alsup, J. K., & Sprigler, M. J. (2003). A comparison of traditional and reform mathematics curricula in an eighth-grade classroom. Education, 123(4), 689-695.

Arslan, Ç. (2007). The development of elementary school students on their reasoning and proof ideas. PhD. Thesis). Uludağ University, Institute of Social Sciences, Bursa.

Arslan, S., & Yıldız, C. (2010). 11. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematiksel düşünmenin aşamalarındaki yaşantılarından yansımalar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(156), 17-31.

Başaran, S. (2011). An exploration of affective and demographic factors that are related to mathematical thinking and reasoning of university students. PhD. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Beaton, A., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., González, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. (2003). Time assessment frameworks and specifications (2003). TIMSS International Study Center 2003. Accessed 22 March 2016.

Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(02), 169-183.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?. Science, 210 (4475), 1262-1264.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222(4627), 1029-1031.

Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474-480.

Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., & Sumpter, L. (2003). Reasoning characteristics in upper secondary school students’ task solving (Research Reports in Mathematics Education Department of Mathematics, Umea University'_Task_Solving/links/0046353c86cc99bab5000000.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2017.

Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., & Sumpter, L. (2008). Upper secondary students' task reasoning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(1), 1-12.

Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 89-105.

Brody, L. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Effects of high school coursework and time on SAT scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 866.

Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical thinking: The struggle for meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35-49.

Çelik, D. (2016). Matematiksel düşünme. E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, İ. Ö. Zembat (Ed.), in Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler (s. 17-42). Ankara: Pegem.

Chreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2014). Karma yöntem araştırmaları: Tasarımı ve yürütülmesi (2. Baskıdan çeviri)(Çev. Ed.: Y. Dede ve SB Demir). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Çiftçi, Z. (2015). Ortaöğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel akıl yürütme becerilerinin incelenmesi. PhD. Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum.

Çoban, H. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel muhakeme becerileri ile bilişötesi öğrenme stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. PhD. Thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Tokat.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

D'Angelo, J. P., & West, D. B. (2000). Mathematical Thinking Problem Solving and Proofs (2nd Edition ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Dreyfus, T. (1990). Processus in advanced mathematical thinking (cap. 5). Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 65-81.

Dreyfus, T. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25-41). Netherlands: Springer.

Dunlop, J. (2001). Mathematical Thinking. 14 December 2010.

Durand-Guerrier, V. (2003). Which notion of implication is the right one? From logical considerations to a didactic perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(1), 5-34.

Edwards, B. S., Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2005). Advanced mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 15-25.

Epp, S. S. (2003). The Role of Logic in Teaching Proof. The American Mathematical Monthly, 10(10), 886-899.

Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43(2), 95-103.

Friedman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A met-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 185-213.

Geary, D. (1994). Children's Mathematical Development: Research and Practical Applications. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

George, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.

Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2005). Advanced mathematical thinking at any age: Its nature and its development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 27-50.

Harnisch, D. L., Steinkamp, M. W., Tsai, S. L., & Walberg, H. J. (1986). Cross-national differences in mathematics attitude and achievement among 17-year olds. International Journal of Educational Development, 6: 233-44.

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269 (5220), 41.

Henderson, R. (2002). Materials development in support of mathematical thinking Accessed 12 March 2011.

Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM Standards. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A Research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 5–26). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Isoda, M., & Katagiri, S. (2012). Mathematical Thinking: How to develop it in the classroom. Singapore: World Scientific.

Jbeili, I. M. A. (2003). The effects of metacognitive scaffolding and cooperative learning on mathematics performance and mathematical reasoning among fifth-grade students in Jordan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University Sains, Malaysia.

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Free Press.

Jensen, A. R. (1988). Sex differences in arithmetic computation and reasoning in prepubertal boys and girls. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 11, 169-232.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Karakoca, A. (2011). Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin problem çözmede matematiksel düşünmeyi kullanma durumları. Master Thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.

Kitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 89-116.

Lamprianou, I., and Lamprianou T. A. (2003). The nature of pupils’ probabilistic thinking in primary schools in Cyprus. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 173-180.

Lângstrôm, P., & Lithner, J. (2007). Students learning strategies and mathematical reasoning in textbook-related metacognitive processes. Research Reports in Mathematics Education, Department of Mathematics, Umeå University.

Leahey, E., & Guo, G. (2001). Gender differences in mathematical trajectories. Social Forces, 80(2), 713-732.

Lithner, J. (1998). Mathematical reasoning and familiar procedures. Umeåuniversitet, Institutionen förmatematik och matematiskstatistik.

Lithner, J. (2000a). Mathematical reasoning in school tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165-190.

Lithner, J. (2000b). Mathematical reasoning and familiar procedures. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 83-95.

Lithner, J. (2003). Students’ mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 29–55.

Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 405–427.

Liu, P. H., & Niess, M. L. (2006). An exploratory study of college students' views of mathematical thinking in a historical approach calculus course. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(4), 373-406.

Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender differences in beliefs and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 254-263.

Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Mandacı Şahin, S. (2007). 8. Sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik gücünün belirlenmesi, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, K.T.Ü, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.

Marshall, S., & Smith, J. (1987). Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 372-383.

Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Mathematical thinking. London: Addison-Wesley.

Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1985). Thinking Mathematically.Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.

McGinty, R., Van Beynen, J., & Zalewski, D. (1986). Do our mathematics textbooks reflect what we preach? School Science and Mathematics, 86, 591–596.

Meehan, A. M. (1984). A meta-analysis of sex differences in formal operational thought. Child Development, 55, 1110-1124.

Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E., & Stumpf, H. (1993). Gender differences in academically talented young students' mathematical reasoning: Patterns across age and sub skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 340.

Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2011). Ortaöğretim matematik (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar-haftalık 4 saat) dersi öğretim programı. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88). Accessed 4 March 2016.

National Longitudinal Survey of Youth-1979. Accessed 4 March 2016.

OECD (2004). The PISA 2003 Assessment framework: mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. OECD Publishing. Accessed 10 January 2016.

Offenbach, S. I. (1965). Studies of children’s probability learning behavior. II. Effect of method and event frequency at two age levels. Child Development, 36(4), 951-962.

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. (Fourth Edition). Avustralya: ALLEN & UNWIN.

Pallas, A. M., & Alexander, K. L. (1983). Sex differences in quantitative SAT performance: New evidence on the differential coursework hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 165-182.

Palm, T., Boesen, J., and Lithner, J. (2005). The requirements of mathematical reasoning in upper secondary level assessments. Research Reports in Mathematics Education 5, Department of Mathematics, Ume˚aUniversity. Accessed 7 April 2016.

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18(11), 948-952.

Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (No. 4). CA: Sage.

Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Polya, G. (1957) How to solve ıt: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Polya, G. (1962).Mathematical discovery: on understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Polya, G. (1965). Mathematical discovery; on understanding and teaching problem solving. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching And Learning, 334-370.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Reflections on doing and teaching mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving, 53-70.

Stacey, K. (2006). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important. Proceedings of APEC-Tsukuba International Conference 2007: Innovative Teaching Mathematics through Lesson Study (II)- Focusing on Mathematical Thinking, 2-7 December 2006, Tokyo and Sapporo, Japan.

Stanley, J. S. (1994). Gender differences for able elementary school students on above-grade level ability and achievement tests. In Talent development: Vol. 2 Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace national research symposium on talent development, Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G. and Ambroson, D. L. Vandalia, (Ed.), OH: Ohio Psychology Press.

Steen, L. A. (1999). Twenty questions about mathematical reasoning. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Tall, D. (1995, July). Cognitive growth in elementary and advanced mathematical thinking. In PME conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1-61). Program Committee of the 19th PME Conference, Brazil.

Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 181-204.

Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 181-204.

Umay, A. (2003). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretmeye ne kadar hazır olduklarına ilişkin bazı ipuçları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(25), 194-203.

Umay, A., & Kaf, Y. (2005). Matematikte kusurlu akıl yürütme üzerine bir çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28), 188-195.

Verhaegen, P., & Salthouse, T. A. (1997). Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models, Psychological Bulletin, 122, 3, 231-249.

Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273-281.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yıldırım, C. (2000). Matematiksel düşünme (3. baskı). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.


  • There are currently no refbacks.





Copyright © 2015. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).