ANALYSIS OF CHESS GRAND MASTERS

Egemen Ermiş, Necati Alp Erilli

Abstract


In chess, in order to determine the status of chess players and their ranks in classification, World Chess Federation awards players with titles - provided that they fulfill certain criteria. The greatest title that can be earned is the title of Grand Master. In this study, age of becoming Chess Grand Masters has been studied. The factors which have caused the age of becoming a Great Master to fall rapidly in recent years have been researched. It has been found that birth dates close to our day and other social opportunities are influential in the fall of the age of Grand Masters.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


chess, grand master, title, chi-square analysis

References


Adelson-Velskiy G.M., Arlazarov V.L., Donskoy M.V. (1975). Some methods of controlling the tree search in chess programs. Artificial Intelligence 6, 361-371.

Averbach, Y. (2000). Endgame in Chess. Broy Inc., İstanbul, Turkey.

Barnes D.J., Castro J.H. (2015). On the limits of engine analysis for cheating detection in chess. Computers & Security, 48, 58-73.

Bennett S., Lasenby J. (2014). ChESS – Quick and Robust Detection of Chess-board Features. Computer Vision and Image Understanding Vol. 118, P. 197–210.

Bilalić M., Smallbone K., McLeod P., Gobet F. (2009). Why Are (the Best) Women so Good at Chess? Participation Rates and Gender Differences in Intellectual Domains. Biological Sciences, Vol. 276, No. 1659, pp. 1161-1165.

Bilalić, M., McLeod, P., Gobet, F. (2007). Personality Profiles of Young Chess Players, Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 901–910.

Boros E., Elbassioni K., Gurvich V., Makino K. (2012). On Nash equilibria and improvement cycles in pure positional strategies for Chess-like and Backgammon-like n-person games. Discrete Mathematics 312, 772–788.

Bourzutschky M.S., Tamplin J.A., Haworth G.M.C. (2005). Chess Endgames: 6 Man Data Strategy. Theoretical Computer Science, 349, 140-157.

Bühren C., Frank B., Krabel S., Werner A. (2012). Decision-making in competitive framings -Strategic behavior of chess players in mini-ultimatum game chess puzzles. Economics Letters 115, 356–358.

Charness N. (2012). Patterns of theorizing about chess skill – Commentary on Linhares and Freitas (2010) and Lane and Gobet (2011). New Ideas in Psychology 30, 322–324.

Chassy P., Gobet F. (2015). Risk taking in adversarial situations: Civilization differences in chess experts. Cognition 141, 36–40.

Dailey D., Hair A., Watkins M. (2014). Move similarity analysis in chess programs. Entertainment Computing 5, 159–171.

de Bruin A.B.H., Rikers R. M.J.P., Schmidt H. G. (2007). The effect of self-explanation and prediction on the development of principled understanding of chess in novices. Contemporary Educational Psychology 32, 188–205.

de Bruin A.B.H., Kok E.M., Leppink J., Camp G. (2014). Practice, intelligence, and enjoyment in novice chess players: A prospective study at the earliest stage of a chess career. Intelligence 45, 18–25.

Draper N.R. (1963). Does Age Affect Master Chess. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 120-127.

Ericsson K.A., Moxley J.H. (2012). A Critique of Howard’s Argument for Innate Limits in Chess Performance or Why We Need an Account Based On Acquired Skill and Deliberate Practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 26: 649–653.

Erilli N.A., Öner Y., Alakuş K., Tunç T. (2010). Classifying Chess Players with Fuzzy Clustering Analysis in Fuzzy Data Using Eco Codes. 1st International Symposium on Computing in Science & Engineering Proceedings Book, pp. 1105-1110.

Ewerhart C. (2002). Backward Induction and the Game-Theoretic Analysis of Chess. Games and Economic Behavior 39, 206-214.

Gerdes C., Gränsmark P. (2010). Strategic behavior across gender: A comparison of female and male expert chess players. Labour Economics 17, 766–775.

Gibbins N.M. (1944). Chess in Three and Four Dimensions. The Mathematical Gazette, Vol. 28, No. 279, pp. 46-50.

Gliga F., Flesner P.I. (2014). Cognitive Benefits of Chess Training in Novice Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 962 – 967.

Gobet F., Ereku M.H. (2014). Checkmate to deliberate practice: the case of Magnus Carlsen. Frontiers in psychology, August, Volume 5, Article878.

Gong Y., Ericsson K.A., Moxley J.H. (2015). Recall of Briefly Presented Chess Positions and Its Relation to Chess Skill. Plos One, March 16.

Grabner R.H., Stern E., Neubauer A.C. (2007). Individual differences in chess expertise: A psychometric investigation. Acta Psychol (Amst). Mar; 124(3):398-420.

Hänggi J., Brütsch K., Siegel A. M., Jäncke L. (2014). The architecture of the chess player's brain. Neuropsychologia, 62, 152–162.

Howard R.W. (2011). Does high-level intellectual performance depend on practice alone? Debunking the Polgar sisters’ case. Cognitive Development, 26, 196– 202.

Howard R.W. (2014). Learning curves in highly skilled chess players: A test of the generality of the power law of practice. Acta Psychologica, 151, 16–23.

Kasparov G. (2007). How Life Imitates Chess. Bloomsbury Publishing, USA.

Kazemi F., Yektayar M., Abad A. M. B. (2012). Investigation the impact of chess play on developing meta-cognitive ability and math problem-solving power of students at different levels of education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 372 – 379.

Kraitchik, M. (1955). Mathematical Recreations. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.

Krawczyk D.C., Boggan A.L., McClelland M.M., Bartlett J.C. (2011). The neural organization of perception in chess experts. Neuroscience Letters, 499, 64– 69.

Linhares A., Freitas A.E. T.A. (2010). Questioning Chase and Simon’s (1973) ‘‘Perception in Chess’’: The ‘‘experience recognition’’ hypothesis. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 64–78.

Peterson I. (1996). The Soul of a Chess Machine. Science News, Vol. 149, No:13, pp. 200-201.

Regan K.W., Haworth G.Mc. (2011). Intrinsic Chess Ratings. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Reti, R. (2009). Modern Ideas in Chess. Russel Enterprises Inc., Milford, USA.

Ruiz F.J., Luciano C. (2012). Improving International –Level Chess Players’ Performance with an Acceptance –Based Protocol: Preliminary Findings. The Psychological Record, 62, 447–462.

Sörqvist P., Halin N., Kjellberg A. (2013). Home Advantage in Chess. Journal of Sport Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 1,99-104.

Storer J.A. (1983). On the complexity of chess. Journal of computer and system sciences (27, 77-100).

Thanatipanonda T. (2014). Rook endgame problems in m by n Chess. Advances in Applied Mathematics 61, 19–24.

Vecek N., Mernik M., Crepinšek M. (2014). A chess rating system for evolutionary algorithms: A new method for the comparison and ranking of evolutionary algorithms. Information Sciences, 277, 656–679.

FIDE Handbook: http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=171&view=article [on-line] (accessed on January 1st 2017).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.1138

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Egemen Ermişdmin, Necati Alp Erilli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).