COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION INCREASES SELF-ESTEEM IN FOURTH GRADERS

Carolin Schulze

Abstract


Accepting heterogeneity as an opportunity for social and knowledge learning and not just perceiving it as a burden is a major task for current school systems and consequently also for teachers. One possibility of successfully dealing with heterogeneity is cooperative learning. Due to its prosocial characteristics, physical education (PE) is particularly suitable for the use of cooperative forms of learning and teaching. Cooperative learning is able to fulfill the double task of PE by promoting the development of personality and enabling the development of current movement and sports culture. However, there are still only a few studies examining the positive effects of cooperative learning in PE classes on personality development and the psychosocial health of school children. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of cooperative learning in PE classes on the self-esteem of fourth-graders in comparison to traditional forms of learning. A total of 127 girls and boys took part in the study (66 intervention group, 61 control group, 60% male). The mean age of the total sample at the beginning of the study was 10.2 ± 1.4 years. The intervention group received PE according to the curriculum, which was carried out through cooperative forms of learning, e.g. cooperative games. The control group received no cooperative learning intervention. There were no group differences with regard to age, sex or number of participants at the beginning of the study. Statistical analysis revealed significant time-by-group differences resulting in self-reported general athleticism (p<.001), attractiveness (p=.015), agility (p=.014), strength (p<.001), coordination (p<.001) and overall self-esteem (p<.001) with a significantly greater improvement within the intervention group. Overall, this research was able to show the positive effects of cooperative learning in PE lessons on the self-esteem of fourth-graders. Cooperative learning in PE requires appropriate qualification offers for future teachers in order to expand their repertoire of methods for this learning structure. The new understanding of teaching aims to help students actively experience their own knowledge and skills during cooperation with classmates.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


cooperative learning, physical education, elementary school, self-esteem

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Hayek, S. (2014). The Effects of Using Cooperative Learning Strategy in Teaching Basketball on Physical Education Students’ Self - Concept and Attitudes. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271720251_The_Effects_of_Using_Cooperative_Learning_Strategy_in_Teaching_Basketball_on_Physical_Education_Students'_Self_-_Concept_and_Attitudes

Bayraktar, G. (2011). The effect of cooperative learning on students’ approach to general gymnastics course and academic achievements. Educational research and reviews, 6(1), 62-71.

Casey, A. (2013). ‘Seeing the trees not just the wood’: Steps and not just journeys in teacher action research. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 147-163.

Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2015). Can cooperative learning achieve the four learning outcomes of physical education? A review of literature. Quest. Quest, 67(1), 56-72.

Cecchini, M., Sassi, F., Lauer, J. A., Lee, Y. Y., Guajardo-Barron, V., & Chisholm, D. (2010). Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: health effects and cost-effectiveness. Lancet, 376(9754), 1775-1784. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61514-0

Cervantes, C. M., Cohen, R., Hersman, B. L., & Barrett, T. (2007). Incorporating PACER into an inclusive basketball unit. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 78(7), 45-50.

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social Committee, & the Committee of the Regions. (2009). Key competences for a changing word. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Darnis, F., & Lafont, L. (2015). Cooperative learning and dyadic interactions: two modes of knowledge construction in socio-constructivist settings for team-sport teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(5), 459-473.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, D. H. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

Decristan, J., Fauth, B., Kunter, M., Büttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2017). The interplay between class heterogeneity and teaching quality in primary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 109-121.

Dreiskämper, D., Tietjens, M., Hohnemann, S., Naul, R., & Freund, P. (2015). PSK-Kinder – Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung des physischen Selbstkonzepts von Kindern im Grundschulalter. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 22, in press. doi:10.1026/1612-5010/a000141

Dyson, B. (2001). Cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20(3), 264-281.

Ellis, S. S. (1990). Introducing Cooperative Learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 34-37.

Goodyear, V. A., & Casey, A. (2015). Innovation with change: Developing a community of practice to help teachers move beyond the ‘honeymoon’ of pedagogical renovation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(2), 186-203.

IBM Corp. (Released 2019). BM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Johnson, H. E. (2002). Circles of learning Cooperation in the classroom (5th ed.). Edina: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperative learning: What special education teachers need to know. The Pointer, 33(2), 5-11.

Kleickmann, T., D., R., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 64(1), 90-106.

Koriat, A. (2012). When are two heads better than one and why? Science (New York, N.Y.), 336(6079), 360-362.

Lafont, L. (2012). Cooperative learning and tutoring in sports and physical activities. Cooperative learning in physical education: A research-based approach, 136-149.

Neber, H., Finsterwald, M., & Urban, N. (2001). Cooperative learning with gifted and high-achieving students: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 199-214.

Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2014). The development of self-esteem. Current directions in psychological science, 23(5), 381-387.

Schniedewind, N., & Davidson, E. (2000). Differentiating Cooperative Learning. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 24-27.

Singh, Y. P., & Agrawal, A. (2011). Introduction to cooperative learning. Indian Streams Research Journal, 1(2), 1-9.

Slavin, R. E. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement. In R. E. Slavin (Ed.), School and classroom organisation. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Stiller, J., & Alfermann, D. (2007). Die deutsche Übersetzung des Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ). Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 14, 149-161. doi:10.1026/1612-5010.14.4.149.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v8i3.4272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Carolin Schulze

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).