PACK RUNNING AMONG FEMALE NCAA COLLEGIATE CROSS COUNTRY TEAMS

Josh Falk, Abigail Larson, Mark DeBeliso

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to identify if there was a relationship between running with a teammate(s), often referred to as packing, during a cross-country race and lower aggregate team times of the top five scoring runners. This study examined packing strategies of Division 1 NCAA female cross-country runners. Packing was defined as any team member running within a second of a teammate at a given checkpoint during the race. All competitors across three women’s races wore chip-timing bibs that recorded each competitor’s time at checkpoints throughout the race. Only teams having five or more runners were included in the analysis. A “packing score %” was calculated for each team by dividing the number of times a runner was within a second of a teammate at a checkpoint in a given interval by the total number of packing opportunities within the interval (PS%). The total scoring team time was then calculated from the finishing time of each team’s top five runners (Team Aggregate Time-TAT). The correlation coefficient between PS% and TAT was r = -0.47 (p < 0.001). While more research is needed to identify how and when packing should be optimally used, empirical findings indicate packing is beneficially associated with team running times.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


packing, distance running performance, coaching strategies, running strategies, group running, team performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baron, B., Moullan, F., Deruelle, F., & Noakes, T. D. (2009). The role of emotions on pacing strategies and performance in middle and long duration sport events. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 19, 220–238.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratlavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 74, 1252–1265.

Cormier, M. L., Bloom, G. A., & Harvey, W. J. (2015). Elite coach perceptions of cohesion on coacting teams. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 10(6), 1039–1053.

Corvalán-Grössling, V. (1995). The physiological and perceived effects of drafting on a group of highly trained distance runners (T). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, 1919-2007.Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0077144

Davies C. T. (1980). Effects of wind assistance and resistance on the forward motion of a runner. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology, 48(4), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1980.48.4.702

Deaner, R. O., Carter, R. E., Joyner, M. J., & Hunter, S. K. (2015). Men are more likely than women to slow in the marathon. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(3), 607–616.

Deaner, R. O., Lowen, A. (2016). Males and females pace differently in high school cross-country races. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(11), 2991–2997.

Evans, B., Eys, M., & Wolf, S. (2013). Exploring the nature of interpersonal influence in elite individual sport teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(4), 448-462.

Hanley, B. (2015) Pacing profiles and pack running at the IAAF World Half Marathon Championships. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33 (11), 1189–1195.

Hanley, B. (2016). Pacing, packing and sex-based differences in Olympic and IAAF World Championship marathons. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(17), 1675-1681.

Høigaard, R., Boen, F., De Cuyper, B., & Peters, D. M. (2013). Team identification reduces social loafing and promotes social laboring in cycling. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 25(1), 33-40.

Høigaard, R., Tofteland, I.; Ommundsen, Y. (2006). The effect of team cohesion on social loafing in relay teams. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 18(1), 59-73.

Hunter, S. K. (2014). Sex differences in human fatigability: Mechanisms and insight to physiological responses. Acta Physiologica, 210(4), 768–789.

Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1995), Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in athletic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 5: 191-199. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00035.x

Pugh L. G. (1971). The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces. The Journal of physiology, 213(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009381

Raafat, R., Chater, N., & Frith, C., (2009). Herding in humans, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 420-428.

Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139-142. doi:10.1057/jt.2009.5

Stevenson, Roy (2016). Cross country running: Learning to race like a team. https://www.roy-stevenson.com/cross-country-running.html

Tarnopolsky, M. A. (2008). Sex differences in exercise metabolism and the role of 17-Beta estradiol. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(4), 648–654.

Zouhal, H., Abderrahman, A. B., Prioux, J., Knechtle, B., Bouguerra, L., Kebsi, W. D., & Noakes, T. (2015). Drafting’s improvement of 3000-m running performance in elite athletes: Is it a placebo effect? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 10, 147-152. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0498.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v9i1.4484

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Josh Falk, Abigail Larson, Mark DeBeliso

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).