EXPERIENCES OF COACH-ATHLETE RELATIONSHIP: A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST, GHANA

Richard Samuel Kwadwo Abieraba

Abstract


Background: The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of the coach-athlete relationship in University of Cape Coast sports teams. The researcher employed the interpersonal constructs of closeness, co-orientation, and complementarity (3Cs model) to explore participants’ feelings, thoughts, and behaviour respectively. Method: Qualitative data was obtained through semi-structured interviews, from 8 participants and their responses were content analyzed. Results: Analysis revealed that closeness (as defined in terms of intimacy, trust, respect, appreciation, and promising), co-orientation (termed as communication, self-disclosure, common goal, and general understanding), and lastly, complementarity (defined as roles, emotional support, academic support and financial support) have helped to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the coach-athlete relationship among University of Cape Coast sports teams. Conclusion: It was concluded that participants showed a high level of closeness, co-orientation, and complementarity in their relationship.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


coach-athlete relationship, closeness, co-orientation, complementarity, 3Cs Model, dyad

Full Text:

PDF

References


UNESCO Charter of Physical Education and Sports (Paris: UNESCO, 1978) http://www.unesco.org/education/nfsunesco/pdf/SPORT_E.PDF. Accessed 20 September 2023

Iso-Ahola, S.E. (1995). Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in athletic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 5: 191-199.

Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART – Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 245-257.

Biddle, S.J.H. (1997). Current trends in sport and exercise psychology research. The Psychol, 10: 63-69.

Rinaldy, M., Suherman, W.S., Arianto, C.A., Ayudi, A.R., & Hartanto, A. (2022). Confidence, motivation, and anxiety; Does it affect the performance of basketball athletes? International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 5 (11), 2643-9840.

Guisinger S, & Blatt, S.J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialectic. Am Psychol, 49: 104-111.

Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). The Greek coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (gr CART-Q): Scale construction and validation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 34(2), 101-124.

Dzramedo, J.E., Amoako, B.M., & Amos, P.M. (2018). The State of the Extended Family System in Ghana: Perceptions of Some Families. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 8(24), 2224-5766.

Hinde, R.A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. London: Psychology Press.

Jowett S, & Cockerill, I.M. (2002). Olympic medalists’ perspective of the athlete–coach relationship. Psychol Sport Exercise in press

Sager, S. S., & Jowett, S. (2012). Communicative acts in Coach–Athlete interactions: When losing competitions and when making mistakes in training. Western Journal of Communication, 76(2), 148-174.

Côté, J., & Gilbert, W. (2009). An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(3), 307-323.

Jowett, S. (2007). Expanding the interpersonal dimension: Closeness in the coach-athlete relationship, a commentary. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2(4), 513-517. doi:10.1260/174795407783359632.

Jowett, S. (2005). The coach-athlete partnership. Sport Psychologist, 18(7), 412-415.

Lyle, J. (2002). Sports coaching concepts: A framework for coaches' behaviour. Routledge.

Yang, S. X., & Jowett, S. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) in seven countries. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 36- 43.

Jowett, S. (2009). Factor structure and criterion-related validity of the metaperspective version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q). Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(3), 163-177. doi:10.1037/a0014998.

Jowett, S., & Meek, G. A. (2000). The coach-athlete relationship in married couples: An exploratory content analysis. Sport Psychologist, 14(2), 157-175.

Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). Issues in studying close relationships: Conceptualizing and measuring closeness. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 63–91). Sage Publications, Inc.

Newcomb, T.M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychol Rev 60:393-404.

Kiesler, D. J. (1997). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 6(4), 339.

Jowett, S. (2003). When the “honeymoon” is over: A case study of a coach-athlete dyad in crisis. Sport Psychologist, 17(4), 444-460.

Duck, S. (1994). Dynamics of relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Behan, C.M. (2016). A Comprehensive Understanding of the Coach-Athlete Relationship: A Post-Secondary Canadian Team Sports Perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Victoria, Canada.

Abraham, A., & Collins, D. (2011). Taking the next step: Ways forward for coaching science. Quest, 63(4), 366-384.

Poczwardowski, A., Barott, J., & Henschen, K. (2002). The athlete and coach: Their relationship and its meaning. Results of an interpretive study. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33(1), 116-140.

Fehr, C. M. (2017). “Examining the coach-athlete relationship as a predictor of NCAA student-athlete satisfaction”, Graduate Student Thesis, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. University of Montana. 10943. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10943.

Bennie, A., & O'Connor, D. (2012). Coach-athlete relationships: A qualitative study of professional sport teams in Australia. International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 10(0), 58-64.

Yang, X. S., & Jowett, S. (2013). Conceptual and measurement issues of the complementarity dimension of the coach-athlete relationship across cultures. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 14, 830-841.

Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the Coach-Athlete Relationship. In S. Jowette & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social Psychology in Sport (pp. 3–14). Human Kinetics.

Jowett, S., & Shanmugam, V. (2016). Relational coaching in sport: It's psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness. In R. J. Schinke, K. R. McGannon, & B. Smith (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 471–484). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Oltmann, S.M. (2016). Qualitative Interviews: A Methodological Discussion of the Interviewer and Respondent Contexts [37 paragraphs]. From Qualitative Sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 15,

http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fas1602156.

Ogah, J. K. (2013). Decision making in the research process. Accra: Adwinsa Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Bloom, G. A. (1996a). Characteristics, Knowledge, and Strategies of Expert Team Sport Coaches, PhD Thesis, University of Ottawa, Canada.

Smith, C.P. (2000). Content Analysis and Narrative Analysis. In H.T. Reis, & C.M. Judd (Eds), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (PP. 313- 332). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ahmad, H. (2014). The Coach- athlete Relationship in the Middle East: Cultural Considerations. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/15237.

Jowett, S. & Cockerill, I. M. (2003). Olympic medalists’ perspective of the athlete-coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 313–331. doi:10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00011-0.

Australian Institute of Business (2022). Why professionalism is important. http://www.aib.edu.au.organizationandculture. Accessed 06 November 2023.

Jowett, S., Kanakoglou, K., & Passmore, J. (2012). The application of the 3+1Cs relationship model in executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030316.

Dominteanu, T. (2014). The significance of the coach-athlete relationship. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 4(7). ISSN- 2249-555X.

Yang, S. X., & Jowett, S. (2010). The development and validation of dominant-submissive interpersonal transactions scales between coaches and athletes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society’s Division of Sport and Exercise Psychology Conference. London, UK.

Jowett, S., Adie, J. W., Bartholomew, K. J., Yang, S. X., Gustafsson, H., & Lopez-Jimenez, A. (2017). Motivational processes in the coach-athlete relationship: a multi-cultural self-determination approach. Loughborough University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2134/26581. Accessed 06 November 2023.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v10i5.5175

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Richard Samuel Kwadwo Abieraba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).