COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR ASSESSMENT OF MOVEMENT COMPETENCE AMBITION AMONG HUMAN KINETICS STUDENTS IN SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITIES, NIGERIA

Isaac Akinloye Oyewumi, Adeolu Oluwaseyi Oyekan, N. Philip Honawon

Abstract


This paper reports the quantitative phase of an ongoing explanatory sequential mixed methods research design on Movement Competence Ambition (MCA) among human kinetics students in public universities within the South-Western geo-political zone of Nigeria. The study holds and treats ambition as a psycho-philosophical concept. The psychological perspective of ambition implying achievement motivation was mixed with its philosophical view of honour-seeking behaviour. Both perspectives relate to Einstein’s inertial-tendency postulate regarding reference frames. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 418 respondents (199, 47.6% males; 219, 52.4% females); x̅ age = 20 years and 1 month). A self-developed 15-item validated questionnaire r =.81 built on the four “P’s” plus one added of ambition drivers, i.e. Predisposing, Precipitating, Perpetuating, Protective, and Prospective (added) factors was the main instrument for data collection. Descriptive statistics of frequency, and percentage, were employed to depict respondents’ bio-data while collected data was analysed with mean and rank ordered. Results indicate that 377 (90.2%) of the students were fairly ambitious while 41 (9.8%) were highly ambitious. 90.9% of males and 89.5% of females were fairly ambitious while more females (10.5%) were highly ambitious as compared to males (9.1%). Though there was no marked difference between the ambition statuses by gender, however, females showed a better level of ambition compared to males. The predisposing factors with a mean of 4.1 have the highest impact on movement competence ambition followed by precipitating factors with the second highest mean value of 3.5. Other factors do not affect the population's ambition status as the factors have mean values below the criterion average of 3.5. Therefore, the predisposing and precipitating factors are areas of concentration to enhance the students’ achievement goal orientation in movement competence.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


ambition, cognitive behavioural therapy, movement competence assessment, human kinetics students, Nigeria

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and Research (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Press.

Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735-750

Cantor, N., Norem, J. K., Niedenthal, P. M., Langston, C. A., & Brower, A. M. (1987). Life tasks, self-concept ideals, and cognitive strategies in a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1178-1191.

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2012). Developing Key Competences at School in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology 63: 367-384.

Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A. (1992). The Movement Assessment Battery for Children; the Psychological Corporation: Kent, UK. [Google Scholar]

Johnes, J. (2006). Measuring Efficiency: A Comparison of Multilevel Modelling and Data Envelopment Analysis in the Context of Higher Education. Bulletin of Economic Research, Volume 58, (2), 75-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-3378.2006.00238

Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). On the value of aiming high: The causes and consequences of ambition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028084

Logan, S. W.; Ross, S. M.; Chee, K.; Stodden, D. F.; Robinson, L. E. (2018). Fundamental motor skills: A systematic review of terminology. Journal of Sports Science. 36, 781–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Lucas, B. and G. Claxton (2009), Wider Skills for Learning: What are they, How can they be Cultivated, How could they be Measured and Why are They Important for Innovation?, Centre for Real-World Learning.

Magill, R. A. (2011). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365-396.

McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five - Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139 –153). New York: Guilford Press.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.

Ní Chróinín, D., Fletcher, T. & O’Sullivan, M. (2017). Pedagogical principles of learning to teach meaningful physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. Volume 23 (2), 171-133.

OECD (2013). Synergies for better learning: an international perspective on evaluation and assessment. 139-146. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190658-en

Roberts, B. W., O’Donnell, M., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Goal and personality development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 541-550.

Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1284-1296.

van der Mars, H., & Harvey, S. (2010). Teaching and assessing racquet games using “play practice.” Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 81, 35–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07 303084.2010.10598478

Invernizzi, P. L., Signorini, G., Colella, D., Raiola, G., Bosio, A., & Scurati, R. (2020). Assessing Rolling Abilities in Primary School Children: Physical Education Specialists vs. Generalists. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 8803. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238803




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v10i5.5180

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Isaac Akinloye Oyewumi, Adeolu Oluwaseyi Oyekan, N. Philip Honawon

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).