DISFLUENCY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING?

Laura Loder Buechel

Abstract


Desirable difficulties, coined by Bjork (1994), includes concepts such as spacing learning, interleaving, and disfluency, all of which can be practiced in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. Sans Forgetica, a disfluent font developed at RMIT University in Australia, was specifically designed to enhance learning. Seventy-two preservice elementary school teachers in Switzerland participated in this study aimed at increasing awareness of desirable difficulties in general, and more specifically in the role of disfluency in reading comprehension. No significant differences between participants receiving a text on scaffolding and desirable difficulties in EFL classrooms in Sans Forgetica or Arial were found yet this study contributes to a larger discussion of alternative practices in English language classrooms around the world.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


desirable difficulties, scaffolding, English language teaching, disfluency, teacher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barley, N. (2016). Using Visually Disfluent Fonts for Cueing and Increased Reading.

Benjamin, A. S. (Ed.). (2011). Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork. Psychology Press.

Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & cognition, 35(2), 201-210.

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society, 2(59-68).

Bjork, R. A., & Kroll, J. F. (2015). Desirable difficulties in vocabulary learning. The American journal of psychology, 128(2), 241.

Bjork, R. A., and Yue, C. L. (2016). Commentary: is disfluency desirable? Meta. Learn. 11,133–137. doi: 10.1007/s11409-016-9156-8

Bjork, R.A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cacali, E. (2016). The Effects of Font on Vocabulary Memorization. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 21, 111-115.

Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the (): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111-115.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.

Eskenazi, M. A., & Nix, B. (2020). Individual differences in the desirable difficulty effect during lexical acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000809

Gardiner, J. M., Smith, H. E., Richardson, C. J., Burrows, M. V., & Williams, S. D. (1985). The generation effect: Continuity between generating and reading. The American journal of psychology, 373-378.

Geller, J., Davis, S. D., & Peterson, D. (2020). Sans forgetica is not desirable for learning.

Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The logical problem of scaffolding in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 19.

Harris, A. (2018). Sans Forgetica: new typeface designed to help students study. Retrieved from https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/all-news/2018/oct/sans-forgetica-news-story

Jacoby, L. L., Craik, F. I., & Begg, I. (1979). Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 585-600.

Jaffe, A., & Bye, J. (2011). Desirable difficulties in the classroom: When learning how matters as much as what. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-addiction/201105/desirable-difficulties-in-the-classroom.

Korn, C. W., Ries, J., Schalk, L., Oganian, Y., & Saalbach, H. (2018). A hard-to-read font reduces the framing effect in a large sample. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25(2), 696-703.

Kühl, T., & Eitel, A. (2016). Effects of disfluency on cognitive and metacognitive processes and outcomes. Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 1-13.

Miles, S. (2010). Good Timing: The Spacing Effect and Grammar Acquisition. English Teaching, 65(2).

Nikmah, N. (2018). The Effects of Font Sizes on Students’ Reading Comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Makassar).

Rello, L., Pielot, M., & Marcos, M. C. (2016, May). Make it big! The effect of font size and line spacing on online readability. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3637-3648).

RMIT University. (2018). Sans Forgetica. Available at https://sansforgetica.rmit/.

Roediger III, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242-248.

Taylor, A., Sanson, M., Burnell, R., Wade, K. A., & Garry, M. (2020). Disfluent difficulties are not desirable difficulties: the (lack of) effect of Sans Forgetica on memory. Memory, 1-8.

Weissgerber, S. C., & Reinhard, M. A. (2017). Is disfluency desirable for learning?. Learning and instruction, 49, 199-217.

Wenzel, K., & Reinhard, M. A. (2019). Relatively unintelligent individuals do not benefit from intentionally hindered learning: The role of desirable difficulties. Intelligence, 77, 101405.

Xie, H., Zhou, Z., & Liu, Q. (2018). Null effects of perceptual disfluency on learning outcomes in a text-based educational context: A meta-analysis.

Yue, C. L., Castel, A. D., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). When disfluency is—and is not—a desirable difficulty: The influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Memory & cognition, 41(2), 229-241.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i2.3344

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).