Sibel Ergün Elverici


It is true that mobile technologies are growing day by day and as part of they are becoming more and more integrated into everyday lives of people of all ages. One of the reasons of their growing popularity is because they serve different needs of individuals. Since mobile technologies have gained importance and become a powerful asset, different uses of them and their integration in education have become a question of many researches in the field. To have better communication and reach the new generation integrating technology to education programs is among these questions. More importance is attributed to technology enhanced teaching and learning activities than in the past. In this regard, as part of mobile technologies, social media has also become more significant. One of the descriptions of social media is platforms where students have constant access to information. Within the education context, it has become prominent that not only social media provides constant access to information, but it also supports students by allowing them to share content, collaborate and support learning. Therefore, again in the context of mobile technologies, by investigating the attitudes of students in higher education towards using social media for educational purposes, this study aims to develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding about their possible use in education. 202 university students formed the sample of this study. Descriptive survey design with a 5 point Likert survey and semi-structured interview were used for the study. The findings of the study suggest that students have a high opinion of social media use and support its use for educational purposes.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


mobile technologies, social media, educational technology, technology integration, English as a Foreign Language (EFL), attitudes, MALL, MELL

Full Text:



Akbari, E., Naderi, A., Simons, R. J., & Pilot, A. (2016). Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 4.

Al Shekaili, B. (2016). Investigating teachers’ actual levels of use of WhatsApp application with English foundation and credit program students at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 4(1), 39-48.

Aşıksoy, G. (2018). ELT Students’ Attitudes and Awareness Towards the Use of Web 2.0 Technologies for Language Learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 240-251.

Ay, T. S., & Deveci, H. (2016). Ways of Using Internet by Classroom Teachers in Social Studies Course. Journal of Education and Future, (9), 31-48.

Balaman, U., & Sert, O. (2017). Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 601–630.

Balcı, A. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler (Dördüncü Baskı). Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık

Barrot, J. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(3), 286–301

Cohen, L. M., & Manion, L. (2001). l. & Morrison, K.(2007). Research methods in education, 6.

Cakir, R., & Solak, E. (2014). Exploring the factors influencing e-learning of Turkish EFL learners through tam. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3).

Grant, S. (2016). Peer review process completion rates and subsequent student perceptions within completely online versus blended modes of study. System, 62(1), 93-101.

Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and information technologies, 22(2), 623-645.

Hamutoğlu, N. B., Savaşçı, M., & Sezen-Gültekin, G. (2019). Digital Literacy Skills and Attitudes towards E-learning. Journal of Education and Future, (16), 93-107.

Huffman, K. (2017). Web 2.0: Beyond the concept practical ways to implement RSS, podcasts, and Wikis. Education Libraries, 29(1), 12-19.

Karademir, T., Erdoğdu, F., & Gökçearslan, Ş. (2017). Two Birds with One Stone: Enhancing Technology Perception with Peer Interaction using Web 2.0. Journal of Education and Future, (11), 111-136.

Karaman, S., Yıldırım, S., & Kaban, A. (2008). Öğrenme 2.0 yaygınlaşıyor: Web 2.0 uygulamalarının eğitimde kullanımına ilişkin araştırmalar ve sonuçları. XIII. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı Bildirileri, 35-40.

Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: an experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 277-290.

Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Kang, J., Harron, J. & Liu, S. (2016). Examining the Use of Facebook and Twitter as an Additional Social Space in a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), pp. 14-26.

Ma, Q. (2017). A multi-case study of university students’ language-learning experience mediated by mobile technologies: a socio-cultural perspective. Computer assisted language learning, 30(3-4), 183-203.

Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95, 216-230.

Mason, R., Rennie, F. (2008). E-Learning and Social Networking Handbook: Resources for Higher Education, Routledge, New York.

Munzur, Z. (2017). Impacts of Technology Enhanced EFL Reading Classroom on Student Learning and Achievement. Journal of Education and Future year, 12, 49-66.

Newland, B., & Byles, L. (2014). Changing academic teaching with Web 2.0 technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(3), 315-325.

O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generations software, September 2005.

Otrar, M., & Argın, F. S. (2015). Öğrencilerin sosyal medyaya ilişkin tutumlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 391-403.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social work, 1(3), 261-283.

Peeters, W. (2018) Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: a taxonomy of the online peer interaction process, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31:8, 905-931, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1465982

Peltier-Davis, C. (2009). Web 2.0, library 2.0, library user 2.0, librarian user 2.0: Innovative services for sustainable libraries, Computers in Libraries, November/December, 16-21.

Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1-39.

Selevičienė, E., & Burkšaitienė, N. (2016). University Students’ attitudes Towards the Usage of Web 2.0 Tools for Learning Esp. A Preliminary Investigation. Societal Studies, 7(2), 270-291.

Shishkovskaya, J. V., & Sokolova, E. Y. (2015). Integration of Web 2.0 Technologies into the Process of Students’ Self-Directed English Learning. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 541545. Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p541

Stevenson, M. P., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO journal, 27(2), 233.

Sundgren, M. (2017). Blurring time and place in higher education with bring your own device applications: a literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 3081–3119. doi: 10.1007/s10639017-9576-3.

Şahin Kızıl, A. (2017). Exploring EFL Learners’ Use of WEB 2.0 Tools: PreliminaryFindings. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute/Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (27).

Tarchi, S., & Pinto, G. (2017). Reciprocal teaching: Analysing interactive dynamics in the coconstruction of a text’s meaning. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 518–530.

Traxler, J. (2013). Mobile learning for languages: Can the past speak to the future. TIRF Mobile Language Learning (MLL) Papers.

Westerman, D, Daniel, E S & Bowman, N D 2016. Learned risks and experiences rewards: Exploring the potential sources of students’ attitudes toward social media and face-to-face communication. Internet and Higher Education, 31, pp. 52-57.

Warschauer, M., and Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, Authorship, and Artifact: The Emergent Semiotics of Web 2.0, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27/2007, 1–23.

Yang, S. H. (2012). Exploring college students' attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 148-154.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seckin Publications.

Yurdagül, C., & Öz, S. (2018). Attitude towards Mobile Learning in English Language Education. Education Sciences, 8(3), 142.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).