UNCOVERING THE USE AND TRANSFER OF COGNITIVE AND METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES ACROSS TEXT TYPES (NARRATIVE & EXPOSITORY READING TEXTS) IN ENGLISH (L3) AMONG MOROCCAN EFL UNIVERSITY LEARNERS

Mohammed Msaddek

Abstract


Based on one of the major sections of my unpublished doctoral thesis defended in 2015, the current study investigates the extent to which Moroccan EFL first-semester university students utilize and transfer (meta) cognitive reading strategies in processing differing English (L3) written texts (i.e., narrative, expository). By addressing 113 university learners (Experimental Group: n=63; Control Group: n=50), the study seeks to find out whether EFL university learners transfer reading strategies (i.e., cognitive, metacognitive) from the narrative written text to the expository one with similar or different frequencies along the continuum of the pre- and post- intervention. To gather the relevant data, such instruments as the reading comprehension texts (i.e., narrative, expository), narrative and expository reading tests, explicit strategy intervention, and a retrospective questionnaire (RQ) were utilized. The findings show that the targeted learners did transfer a host of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies (CMRSs) across text types with varying frequencies of use at both pre- and post-testing levels. Thus, it is deducible that text genre is an influencing variable on the learners’ frequent usage and flexible transfer of CMRSs in the achievement of L3 reading comprehension. Further, some implications and limitations related to this undertaken study are stated.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


(meta)cognitive reading strategies, metacognition, strategy transfer, reading strategy use, text genre

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers’ prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 22(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969009547700

Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828401500213

Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29, 137-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951

Botsas, G. (2017). Differences in strategy use in the reading comprehension of narrative and science texts among students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 139–162. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1141985.pdf

Brown, A. L. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in Reading: Research and Instruction (pp. 501-529). Washington, D.C.: National Reading Conference. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED252810

Carrell, P. L. (1984). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom implications and applications. The Modern Language Journal, 68(4), 332-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.15404781.1984.tb02509

Carrell, P.L. (1988). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524513

Cervetti, G. N., Bravo, M. A., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., & Jaynes, C. A. (2009). Text genre and science content: Ease of reading, comprehension, and reader preference. Reading Psychology, 30(6), 487-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710902733550

Denis, M. (1982). Imaging while reading text: A study of individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 10(6), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202436

Duke, N. K., Pearson, P.D., Strachan, S.L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S.J. Samuels and A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction (4th ed., pp. 51-93). Newark, DE: The International Reading Association. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303174858_What_research_has_to_say_about_reading_instruction

Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271221

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive Monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s Oral Communication Skills. New York: Academic Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Children_s_Oral_Communication_Skills.html?id=ezR-AAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Francis, H. & Hallam, S. (2000). Genre effects on higher education students’ text reading for understanding. Higher Education, 39(3), 279-296. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3447912

Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-97150-000

Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1985). Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(4), 331–346.

Ghazali, N.F., & Baa, S. (2023). The Correlation between EFL students’ metacognitive reading strategy and their reading comprehension on English expository text. IDEAS Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning Linguistics and Literature 11(1):1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i1.3258

Goodman, K.S. (1973). Psycholinguistic universals of the reading process. In F. Smith (ed.), Psycholinguistics and Reading (pp. 21-29). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED071031

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2001). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Methods in Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 187-204). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Guo, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Williams, R. S. (2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults’ reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 159–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11403086

Horiba, Y. (2000). Reader control in reading: Effects of language competence, text type, and task. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 223–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2903_3

Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3-4), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2203&4_4

Koda, K. (2005). Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross Linguistic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524841

Kraal, A., Koorneef, A. W., Saab, N., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Processing of expository and narrative texts by low and high-comprehending children. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2017-2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9789-2

Lawrence, L. J. (2007). Cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies revisited: Implications for instruction. The Reading Matrix, 7 (3), 55-71. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1066590

Msaddek, M. (2013). The role of metacognitive thinking in text processing. In A. Zaki, M. Najbi, & A. Chaibi (Eds.), Critical Thinking Skills in English Language Education: Proceedings of the 32nd Moroccan Association of Teachers of English Annual Conference Oujda, April 9 through 12, 2012 (pp. 41-46). Oujda: Publication of the Moroccan Association of Teachers of English (MATE). Printed by Safahate Design, Béni Mellal. Dépôt légal: 2013 M0 0221. ISBN: 978-9981-9537-3-4. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380424970_The_Role_of_Metacognitive_Thinking_in_Text_Processing_Proceedings_of_the_Moroccan_Association_of_Teachers_of_English_Critical_Thinking_Skills_in_English_Language_Education_Mate_32nd_Annual_Conference_

Msaddek, M. (2015). Moroccan EFL Students’ Learning of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Rabat FLHS Semester One Students as a Case Study (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

Msaddek, M. (2017). The text type effect on Moroccan EFL university learners’ reading achievement. English Language and Literature Studies (ELLS), 7(2), 99-109. Canadian Center of Science and Education (CCSE). http://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v7n2p99

Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1998). Metalinguistic awareness and literacy acquisition in different languages. In D. Wagner, R. Venezy, & B. Street (Eds.), Literacy: An International Handbook (pp. 155–160). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Literacy.html?id=MmcOAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Niforoushan, S., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, G. (2024). The role of text type on the use of metacognitive reading strategies: Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions in focus. Curriculum Research, 5(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.71703/cure.2024.1107725

Pappas, C. C., & Pettegrew, B. S. (1998). The role of genre in the psycholinguistic guessing game of reading. Language Arts, 75(1), 36-43. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41962025

Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. New Jersey: Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315107493-4/schemata-building-blocks-cognition-david-rumelhart

Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2007). Role of phonological and morphological awareness in L2 oral word reading. Language Learning, 57(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00409.x

Schmitz, A., & Dannecker, W. (2023). Strategies for expository and narrative texts. Students’ perspectives on text type-specific cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 22, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2023.23.1.407

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7 (4), 351-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307

Stebner, F., Schuster, C., Weber, X.-L., Greiff, S., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2022). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: Effects on strategy application and content knowledge acquisition. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 715–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09322-x.

Stewart, O., & Tei, E. (1983). Some implications of metacognition for reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 27(1), 36-43.

Sun, Y., Zhou, W., & Tang, S. (2024). Effects of adjunct questions on L2 reading comprehension with texts of different types. Behavioral Sciences, 14 (2), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020138

Tonks, S. M., & Taboada, A. (2011). Developing self-regulated readers through instruction for reading engagement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 173-186). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Handbook-of-Self-Regulation-of-Learning-and-Performance/Schunk-Greene/p/book/9781138903197

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Yoshida, M. (2012). The interplay of processing task, text type, and proficiency in L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 1-29. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ974102.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i2.5939

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).