UPPER EYELID BLEPHAROPLASTY RESULTS AND EVALUATION OF PATIENT SATISFACTION

Çiğdem Deniz Genç

Abstract


The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of upper eyelid blepharoplasty on surgical results, recovery time, complications, scar development and patient satisfaction in cases that undergo upper eyelid blepharoplasty. 184 eyes of 92 patients who had undergone upper eyelid blepharoplasty were evaluated in the present study. The patients were evaluated in terms of surgical results, complications, recovery time and scar development. In the postoperative second month, the patients were given Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) to determine the changes in the life quality of patients and surgical benefit and to determine the characteristics of this change. The mean age was found as 59,2 ±6,8 years and 81.5% of the patients were female. Skin and fat excision were performed in all patients. None of the patients underwent muscle excision. 86.9% of the patients stated that they were very satisfied with the surgery, 6.5% stated that they were satisfied, 5.5% stated that they were moderately satisfied and 1.1% stated that they were not satisfied. According to GBI results, an increase was found in both total GBI score and in sub-scores other than physical score. Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is a common surgery for functional reasons and aesthetic concerns. Accurate evaluation and surgery increase patients’ quality of life and patient satisfaction.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


upper eyelid; blepharoplasty; patient satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akkaya, S. (2018). Evaluation of surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and potential complications after blepharoplasty. Beyoglu Eye Journal, 3(2), 91-95.

Broer, P. N., Levine, S. M., & Juran, S. (2014). Plastic surgery: quo vadis? Current trends and future projections of aesthetic plastic surgical procedures in the United States. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 133(3), 293e-302e.

Bullock, J. D., Warwar, R. E., Bienenfeld, D. G., Marciniszyn, S. L., & Markert, R. J. (2001). Psychosocial implications of blepharoptosis and dermatochalasis. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 99, 65.

Çorak, E. F., Kazancı, B. (2022). Evaluation of the effect of removed tissue in upper blepharoplasty on surgıcal outcomes and patient satısfaction. Ankara Eğt. Arș. Hast. Derg., 55(1): 18-22 DOI: 10.20492/aeahtd.971806.

Damasceno, R. W., Cariello, A. J., Cardoso, E. B., Viana, G. A., & Osaki, M. H. (2011). Upper blepharoplasty with or without resection of the orbicularis oculi muscle: a randomized double-blind left-right study. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 27(3), 195-197.

Demirok, G., Gürdal, C., Atik, E., Kocaoğlu, F. A., & Örnek, F. (2017). Üst Kapak Blefaroplasti Sonrası Uzun Dönem Sonuçların ve Hasta Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi. MN Oftalmoloji, 24(3), 138-42.

Gracitelli, C. P., Osaki, T. H., Hirai, F. E., Yabumoto, C., Viana, G. A., & Osaki, M. H. (2017). Assessment of self-esteem and psychological aspects in patients undergoing upper blepharoplasty. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia, 76, 280-284.

Herruer, J. M., Prins, J. B., van Heerbeek, N., Verhage-Damen, G. W. J. A., & Ingels, K. J. A. O. (2018). Patient-reported outcome measurement in upper blepharoplasty: how to measure what the patient sees. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 71(9), 1346-1351..

Hollander, M. H., Contini, M., Pott, J. W., Vissink, A., Schepers, R. H., & Jansma, J. (2019). Functional outcomes of upper eyelid blepharoplasty: A systematic review. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 72(2), 294-309.

Hoorntje, L. E., van der Lei, B., Stollenwerck, G. A., & Kon, M. (2010). Resecting orbicularis oculi muscle in upper eyelid blepharoplasty–a review of the literature. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 63(5), 787-792.

Jacobsen, A. G., Brost, B., Vorum, H., & Hargitai, J. (2017). Functional benefits and patient satisfaction with upper blepharoplasty–evaluated by objective and subjective outcome measures. Acta Ophthalmologica, 95(8), 820-825.

Kim, D., Son, D., Kim, M., Harijan, A., Yang, S., & Lee, S. (2015). Does upper blepharoplasty affect frontalis tonicity?. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 68(5), 638-644.

Kim, J. W., Lee, H., Chang, M., Park, M., Lee, T. S., & Baek, S. (2013). What causes increased contrast sensitivity and improved functional visual acuity after upper eyelid blepharoplasty?. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 24(5), 1582-1585.

Mokhtarzadeh, A., McClelland, C., Lee, M. S., Smith, S., & Harrison, A. R. (2017). The bleph and the brain: the effect of upper eyelid surgery on chronic headaches. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 33(3), 178-181.

Nakra, T., Modjtahedi, S., Vrcek, I., Mancini, R., Saulny, S., & Goldberg, R. A. (2016). The effect of upper eyelid blepharoplasty on eyelid and brow position. Orbit, 35(6), 324-327.

Papadopulos, N. A., Hodbod, M., Henrich, G., Kovacs, L., Papadopoulos, O., Herschbach, P., & Machens, H. G. (2019). The effect of blepharoplasty on our patient's quality of life, emotional stability, and self-esteem. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30(2), 377-383.

Pemberton, J. D., Salter, M., Fay, A., Thuro, B., Spencer, H., & Dajani, O. (2018). Investigation of Goldmann perimetry in evaluation of patients for upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Orbit, 37(1), 48-52.

Robinson, K., Gatehouse, S., & Browning, G. G. (1996). Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 105(6), 415-422.

Rogers, S. A., Khan-Lim, D., & Manners, R. M. (2012). Does upper lid blepharoplasty improve contrast sensitivity?. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 28(3), 163-165.

Rohrich, R. J. , Coberly. D. M., F agien S., et al. (2004). Current concepts in aesthetic upper blepharoplasty. P last Reconstr Surg. 32(3), e-42 e. doi: 10.1097/01. prs.0000105684.06281.32.

Saalabian, A. A., Liebmann, P., & Deutinger, M. (2017). Which tissue should be removed in upper blepharoplasty? Analysis and evaluation of satisfaction. World journal of plastic surgery, 6(3), 324.

Smith, H. B., Jyothi, S. B., Mahroo, O. A. R., Shams, P. N., Sira, M., Dey, S., ... & Jones, C. A. (2012). Patient-reported benefit from oculoplastic surgery. Eye, 26(11), 1418-1423.

Warwar, R. E., Bullock, J. D., Markert, R. J., Marciniszyn, S. L., & Bienenfeld, D. G. (2001). Social implications of blepharoptosis and dermatochalasis. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 17(4), 234-240.

Yang P., Ko A. C. , Kikkawa D. O., Korn, B. (2017). Upper eyelid blepharoplasty: evaluation, treatment, and complication minimization. Semin Plast Surg. 31(1), 51-57.

Zhang, S. Y., Yan, Y., & Fu, Y. (2020). Cosmetic blepharoplasty and dry eye disease: a review of the incidence, clinical manifestations, mechanisms and prevention. International journal of ophthalmology, 13(3), 488.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejphs.v5i2.129

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Çiğdem Deniz Genç

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2019 - 2023. European Journal of Public Health Studies (ISSN 2668-1056/ISSN-L 2668-1056) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.