INCIDENTAL SIMILARITY AND INFLUENCE OF FOOD PREFERENCES AND JUDGMENT: CHANGING TO BE CLOSER TO SIMILAR PEOPLE

Angélique Martin, Nicolas Guéguen, Céline Jacob, Jacques Fischer-Lokou

Abstract


Research has shown that people like more those who have something in common with them and are more likely to comply with a request addressed by similar individuals. We hypothesized that such similarity could also influence people’s preferences. First, 8-9-year- old children were led to believe that they shared the same birthday with an instructor. Afterwards, the children were asked about their food preferences and solicited to taste vegetables they disliked. Two weeks later, a survey was administered and revealed that the children in the incidental similarity condition expressed a higher liking for the vegetable disliked and more vegetable consumption. These changes in their vegetable consumption were confirmed by their mother. We suggest that similarity led participants to change their own attitudes and values to bring them closer to a similar target.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


similarity, children, evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., & Anderson, C. (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 35-43.

Emswiller, T., Deaux, K., & Willits, J. E. (1971). Similarity, sex, and requests for small favors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 284-291.

Finch, J. F., & Cialdini, R. B. (1989). Another direct tactic of (self-) image management: Boosting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 222-232.

Green, P. W., & Giles, H. (1973). Reactions to a stranger as a function of dress style: The tie. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 676.

Guéguen, N. (2015). Similarity and sensitive topics survey: When similarity elicit answers to intimate questions in survey research. Current Psychology, 34, 58-65.

Guéguen, N., Martin, A., & Meineri, S. (2011). Similarity and social interaction: When similarity fosters implicit behavior toward a stranger. Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 671-673.

Guéguen, N., Pichot, N., & Le Dreff, G. (2005). Similarity and helping behavior on the Web: The impact of the convergence of surnames between a solicitor and a solicitee in a request made by e-mail. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 423-429.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.

Jiang, L., Hoegg, J., Dahl, D. W., Chattopadhyay, A. (2010). The persuasive role of incidental similarity on attitudes and purchase intentions in a sales context. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 778-791

Martin, A., & Guéguen, N. (2013). The influence of incidental similarity on self-revelation in response to an intimate survey. Social Behavior and Personality. 41, 353-356.

Martin, A., Jacob, C., & Guéguen, N. (2013). Similarity facilitates relationships on social networks: A field experiment on Facebook. Psychological Reports, 113, 1-4.

Miller, D. T., Downs, J. S., & Prentice, D. A. (1998). Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit relationship: The social bond between birthdaymates. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 475–81.

Oates, K., & Wilson, M. (2002). Nominal kinship cues facilitate altruism. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, 269, 105-109.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejphs.v7i2.176

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Angélique Martin, Nicolas Guéguen, Céline Jacob, Jacques Fischer-Lokou

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2019 - 2023. European Journal of Public Health Studies (ISSN 2668-1056/ISSN-L 2668-1056) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.