DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATION AND RECONFIGURATION: A MATERIALIST READING OF WALT WHITMAN’S 1855 LEAVES OF GRASS

Tia Byer

Abstract


The following article discusses the material conditions of production surrounding Walt Whitman’s 1855 Leaves of Grass. As a self-published poetry collection, I argue that Whitman uses paratextual features to mirror the text’s thematic rubric. By employing a materialist framework, this article claims that Whitman’s interpretation of America’s retroactive relationship to its democratic founding drives his collection. In depicting the nation as a work in progress, Whitman forces the American reader to revisit, reform and evolve the limited state of democratic power evidenced in his present-day nation. As self-reflexive focalization of the national condition, Leaves of Grass, through its unpretentious material composition, reconstructs the image of the poet as the necessary mediator of America’s unique political conception. Drawing upon Derrida’s synchronic assessment of the Declaration of Independence’s constative and performative structure, as well as Raymond Williams’ championing of the significance of a text’s cultural material context, this article claims that Whitman’s Leaves of Grass is a political project that provides intervention for the democratic failures of America’s founding principles.


Keywords


Walt Whitman, Materialism, Derrida, proletariat

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barthes, R, editor. 1967. “The Death of the Author”. Image, Music, Text. Translated by Stephen Heath, Fontana CA: Fontana Press, pp. 142-149.

Bellis, P. J, 1999. “Against representation: The 1855 edition of “leaves of grass”. The Centennial Review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp.71-95. JSTOR, https://bit.ly/2RyV6Js. Accessed 5 Nov. 2019.

Burke, S, 1992. The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.

Derrida, J, 1986. “Declaration of Independence”. New Political Science, vol. 7, no.1, pp. 7-15, https://bit.ly/2rSPfUN. Accessed 15 Oct. 2019.

De Tocqueville, A, 2004. Democracy in America, 1835. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer, New York: Library of America.

Douglass, F, 1852. “What to the Negro is the Fourth of July?”. The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, https://bit.ly/2PJfmHb. Accessed 19 December 2019.

Emerson, R. W, 2000. “The Poet, 1844”. The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, edited by Brooks Atkinson, New York: Modern Library, pp. 287-307.

Erkkila, B, 1989. Whitman the Political Poet. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Fenimore Cooper, J, 2010. The American Democrat: The Social and Civic Relations of the United States of America, 1838. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Folsom, E, 1997. Walt Whitman’s Native Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frank, M, 2005. “Whitman’s Multitudes, for Better and Worse”. The New York Times, 18 Nov, https://nyti.ms/2QDHikN. Accessed 19 Dec 2019.

Gilmore, M. T, 2010. The War on Words: Slavery, Race, and Free Speech in American Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kurant, W, 2011. “‘Strange Fascination’: Walt Whitman, Imperialism, and the South.” Walt Whitman Quarterly Review, vol. 29, no. 2-3, pp. 81–95

Maas, D. F. 2003, “Reflections on Self-Reflexiveness in Literature.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 313–321. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/42578318. Accessed 19 May 2020.

Matthiessen, F. O, 1968. American Renaissance: Art and Expression in the Age of Emerson and Whitman. Oxford University Press.

Morton, H, 2005. “Democracy, Self-Reviews and the 1855 Leaves of Grass.” Virginia Quarterly Review: A National Journal of Literature and Discussion, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 229–243. EBSCOhost, https://bit.ly/2QGPXDi. Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.

Nussbaum, M, 2011. “Democratic Desire: Walt Whitman”. A Political Companion to Walt Whitman, edited by Jon E. Seery. University Press of Kentucky, p. 96- 131.

Outka, P. H, 2002. “Whitman and Race (‘He’s Queer, He's Unclear, Get Used to It’).” Journal of American Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 293–318.

Paine, T, 1955. ‘Common Sense, 1776’. Thomas Paine: Collected Writings, edited by Eric Foner, New York: The Library of America, pp. 5- 60.

School of Law, 2020.Washington University in St. Louis,28 Dec, https://onlinelaw.wustl.edu/blog/legal-english-de-factode-jure/. Accessed 1 June 2020.

Smith, Adam, 2002. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1759. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spencer, E. C, 2008. “Competing Voices of the INA, BIA, and Circuit Courts on U.S. National Status: Insight from Walt Whitman's 1855 Leaves of Grass” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, vol. 23, no. 1 (Fall 2008): p. 221-244. HeinOnline, https://bit.ly/2JOIRpL. Accessed 5 Nov. 2019.

Swallow Prior, K, 2016. “Why Walt Whitman Called America the ‘Greatest Poem’”. The Atlantic, 25 Dec, https://bit.ly/2ivumJz. Accessed 18 Dec 2019.

Whitman, W, and Cowley. M, 1986.Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass. First (1855) ed., London: Penguin Books.

Whitman, W, 1855. Leaves of Grass. Book. Hugh Sharp Collection 1938 National Library of Scotland. Edinburgh.

---2001. Leaves of Grass: The “Death-Bed” Edition. 1892. New York: Modern Library.

Williams, R, 1983. Writing in Society. London: Verso.

--- 1996. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory”. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism: A Reader, edited by Ryan, Kiernan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 22-28.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejls.v2i2.189

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018. European Journal of Literary Studies (ISSN 2601-971X / ISSN-L 2601-971X). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.