NARRATIVE INTERPRETIVE CENTERS IN RAY BRADBURY’S 'CISTERN': EXPOSING INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL HUMAN CONFLICTS

Abdullah H. Kurraz

Abstract


In the light of the inevitable twinning of linguistic theory and literary critical interpretation and appreciation, Ray Bradbury's narrative techniques constitute his own thematic and aesthetic discourse. Bradbury’s stylistic narrative discourse evokes a set of narrative tools through which characters communicate ideas, thoughts, and feelings, creating aesthetic effects that appeal to readers. These blended artistic elements are interpreted in the light of theoretical fictional context of narrator-character, character-character, narrator-reader interactions. Exploring a web of narrative-characterization centers in Bradbury’s story Cistern, the paper sheds light on the centers of point of view, dialogic narrative technique, and thematic concerns that include internal and external conflicts. Meantime, the paper draws on Gérard Genette’s analytical method of study of narrative discourse, among others. Moreover, Bradbury's themato-narrative techniques offer a fresh interpretative community for understanding his narrative characterization centers and serve as a receptionist case study for scholars and critics of modern literary criticism.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


Ray Bradbury, human conflicts, narratology, narrative-stylistic centers, characterization.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barry, Peter (2009). “Narratology.” Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Barthes, Roland. (1975). “An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative.” New Literary History. 6 (2), pp. 237-272.

Birch, David (1989). Language, Literature and Critical Practice. London and New York: Routledge.

Bradbury, Ray (1947). The Cistern. http://raybradbury.ru/library/story/47/5/0/. [Accessed 8.7.2017].

Brown, Philip (2017). “Narrative: An Ontology, Epistemology, and Methodology for Pro-environmental Psychology Research.” Energy Research & Social Science Journal. 31, pp. 215-222.

Eagan, Colleen (2014). “Exploring Linguistic Structure in Short Fiction: The Case for Collaboration between Literary and Technical Analysis.” MA Thesis. Carnegie Mellon University. http://repository.cmu.edu/hsshonors. [Accessed 8.3.2017]

Fludernik, Monika (2009). An Introduction to Narratology. Trans. by Patricia Häusler-Greenfield and Monika Fludernik. London: Routledge.

Genette, Gerard (1980). Narrative Discourse. Trans. Jane E. Lewin. London: Blackwell.

Iser, Wolfgang. Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from

Bunyan to Becket. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1978.

Jonathan R. Eller and William E Touponce (2004). Ray Bradbury: The Life of Fiction. Kent, OH: Kent State UP.

Liu, Yujun (2009). “The Significance of Structure in Analyzing Short Stories.” Asian Social Science. 5(8), pp. 141-143.

Louchart, Sandy and Aylett, Ruth (2004). “Narrative Theory and Emergent Interactive Narrative.” Int. J. Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning. 14 (6), pp. 506-518.

Makokha, J. K. S., Remmy Barasa, and Adeyemi Daramola, eds. (2010). Tales, Tellers, and Tale-making: Critical Studies on Literary Stylistics and Narrative Style in Contemporary African Literature. Saarbrüken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

Prince, Gerald (1980). “Introduction to the Study of the Narratee,” in Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism, ed. Jane P. Tompkins (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Raeisian, Mona (2013). “A Postmodernist Overview of Grand Narratives in the Short Fiction of Ray Bradbury.” MA Thesis. Islamic Azad University. http://srbiau.ac.ir/Files/ABSTRACT-language/266435.pdf. [Accessed 8.3.2017]

Shigematsu, Eri (2016). “Distance between the Two Selves: A Stylistic Analysis of the Narrative Techniques for Representing Consciousness in Robinson Crusoe.” Hiroshima studies in English Language and Literature. 60, pp. 51-52.

Simpson, Paul (2004). Stylistics. London and New York: Routledge.

Whiffen, Timothy (2013). “Compare the Techniques that George Orwell and Ray Bradbury Use in their Texts, 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 Respectively, to Explore the Struggle against Oppression.” https://www.academia.edu/4816660/Compare_the_techniques_that_George_Orwell_and_Ray_Bradbury_use_in_their_texts_1984_and_Fahrenheit_451_respectively_to_explore_the_struggle_against_oppression. [Accessed 15.5.2018]

Ylagan, Christian (2017). “Why Do the Heavens Beckon Us? Revisiting Constructions of Home and Identity in Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles.” Fafnir – Nordic Journal of Science Fiction and Fantasy Research. 2 (4), pp. 29-41.

Zhang, Zhiqin (2010). “The Interpretation of a Novel by Hemingway in Terms of Literary Stylistics.” Language, Society, and Culture. 30, pp. 155–61.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018. European Journal of Literary Studies (ISSN 2601-971X / ISSN-L 2601-971X). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.