AN ANALYSIS OF FEMINIST CRITICISM AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PORTRAYAL OF WOMEN IN THE MULTI-LEVEL AND TRADITIONAL SOCIETY IN THE SELECTED WORK A ROSE FOR EMILY BY WILLIAM FAULKNER

Nguyen Truc Giang, Thai Cong Dan

Abstract


This paper delves into the realm of feminist criticism and explores the portrayal of women in traditional society through a close examination of William Faulkner's renowned short story, "A Rose for Emily." The study aims to shed light on the patriarchal constructs that shaped women's roles and identities during the time the story was set. Drawing upon feminist literary theory, the research analyzes the ways in which Faulkner depicts the female character in "A Rose for Emily." Emily's life becomes a symbol of the oppression and control exerted on women in the patriarchal society depicted in the story. Using textual evidence and critical analysis, the paper explores the themes of oppression, control, and the limited agency granted to women in the traditional Southern society. Furthermore, the research examines the impact of societal norms on the character's choices, relationships, and sense of self. Through a comprehensive examination of the selected work, this research aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on feminist criticism and the portrayal of women in traditional societies. By delving into the complexities of gender dynamics and societal expectations, it seeks to foster a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by women in patriarchal societies and the ways in which literature reflects and perpetuates these structures.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


“A Rose for Emily”, feminist criticism, portrayal of women, traditional society, William Faulkner

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajmal, M., Siddiqui, S., & Hafeez, A. (2023). Comparing the Theme of Submissiveness in James Joyce's “Eveline” and William Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily”. International Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies, 3(i), 124.

Altuğ, Z. A. (2022). An unusual sublimation of the female: Maternal power over paternal repression in William Faulkner’s as I Lay Dying. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Research, (31), 1311-1328.

Asmarani, R. (2017). The Stunted Identity of Emily Grierson in A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner. Culturalistics: Journal of Cultural, Literary, and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 23-30.

Assmann, C., Rupp, J., & Schwanecke, C. (Eds.). (2023). The Transformative Power of Literature and Narrative: Promoting Positive Change: A Conceptual Volume in Honour of Vera Nünning (Vol. 86). Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.

Atkinson III, T. B. (2001). Faulkner and the Great Depression: aesthetics, ideology, and the politics of art. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.

Awais, S. (2021). Feminist Literature and Criticism. Dareecha-e-Tahqeeq, 2(4), 13-21.

Bali, M. (2019). Reimagining digital literacies from a feminist perspective in a postcolonial context. Media and Communication, 7(2), 69-81.

Barry, P. (2020). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory. Beginning theory (fourth edition). Manchester University Press.

Bergonzoni, M. (2011). Alina Marazzi's Un'ora sola ti vorrei and Vogliamo anche le rose: The personal stands for the political. Studies in Documentary Film, 5(2-3), 247-253.

Bhuvaneswari, K. (2022). The Novel Literature Shows the Social Change of Marginalized People. International Research Journal of Tamil. 4. 95-101.

Cao, S., & Cao, X. (2011). Female Characters' Productivity in William Faulkner's Novels. Studies in Literature and Language, 2(3), 56.

Coe, K., & Palmer, C. T. (2008). The words of our ancestors: Kinship, tradition, and moral codes. World Cultures eJournal, 16(1).

Dokumacı, P. (2023). Feminist Trouble: Intersectional Politics in Postsecular Times. Hypatia, 38(1).

Ella, B. A., Smadar, B. A., & Shirley, D. S. (2023). Social punishment by the distribution of aggressive TikTok videos against women in a traditional society. Journal of information, communication and ethics in society, 21(1), 129-142.

Fazli, B. A. (2023). Methodology of literary criticism based on the theory of feminism. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 4(1), 142-148.

Feng, S. (2021). Fallen Monument: A Marxist Analysis of William Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 3(3), 85-87.

Goodman, R. T. (Ed.). (2015). Literature and the development of feminist theory. Cambridge University Press.

Guo, R. (2019). Brief analysis of feminist literary criticism. 2018 International Workshop on Education Reform and Social Sciences (ERSS 2018) (pp. 453-456). Atlantis Press.

Hansen, J. (2021). A Rose for Emily Conflict. eNotes Editorial. https://www.enotes.com/topics/rose-emily/questions/what-is-the-conflict-in-a- rose-for-emily-by-444055.

Haslanger, S. (2019). Agency within structures and warranted resistance: Response to commentators. Australasian Philosophical Review, 3(1), 109-121.

Hoang, T. H. & Hoang, T. H. H. (2016). Acculturation in Vietnamese Contemporary Literature. International Journal of Communication and Media Studies (IJCMS) 6, no.3.

Hogan, P. C., & Irish, B. J. (2022). Introduction. Literary Feelings: Understanding Emotions. In The Routledge Companion to Literature and Emotion (pp.1-11). Routledge.

Hu, S., & Zhong, J. (2022). On the Grotesque in American Southern Gothic Fiction: A Case Study of “A Rose for Emily”. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2. 38- 43.

Huang, Y. (2019). An Analysis on Rose in A Rose for Emily. Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(2), 202-205.

Ismail, H. M. (2023). Objectification: Examples of Female Characters in Selected Traditional Fairy Tales. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(4), 939- 943.

Janette, M. (2018). Vietnamese American Literature. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Oxford University Press.

Johansen, J. D. (2010). Feelings in literature. Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 44, 185-196.

Jumpertz, J., & Tary, W. (2020). An empirical study of readers’ identification with a narrator. Anglistik, 31(1), 111-128.

Kardinamary, K. (2022). Social Change Depicted in Short Stories of Sundara Ramasamy.Indian Journal of Multilingual Research and Development. 43-48.

Khrais, S. M. (2017). An Eyesore among Eyesores": The Significance of Physical Setting in Faulkner's" A Rose for Emily. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(6), 123-126.

Klinkosumsivadol, K., Phubaengmai, T., Taikul, P., & Tiwong, S. (2022). Attitudes of Society towards Breaking Beauty Standards Advertising. In 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA) (pp. 373-377). IEEE.

Leruth, L. E., & Nicolas, P. J. (2010). The Crisis and Perceptions of Ms. Emily. Reflections and Perspectives of Economic Life, 49(1), 043-057.

Lived, A. W, & Ridor-Unciano, J. (2022). Personal Growth and Development of Students’ Literary Appreciation. The Review of Contemporary Scientific and Academic Studies, (7)2.

Malik, S. (2014). An Introduction to Feminist Literary Criticism: At a Brief Glance. International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity, 58- 61.

McKenna, A. J. (2022). Faulkner's Novels Past and Present. Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture, 29, 39-61.

Medina, J. (2020). The other within: Agency and resistance under conditions of exclusion. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(1), 18-24.

Meng, O. (2022). The Self-Value Construction of Female Characters in Hidden Figures from the Perspective of Feminism. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(2), 64-67.

Mohanlal, S., Sharada, B. A., Fatihi, A. R., Gusain, L., Karunakaran, K., Bayer, J. M., & Ravichandran, S. M. (2010). Feminist Literary Criticism.

Morrison, T., Fowler, D., & Abadie, A. J. (1986). Faulkner and Women: Faulkner and Yoknapatawpha, 1985.

Nebeker, H. E. (1970). Emily's Rose of Love: Thematic Implications of Point of View in Faulkner's" A Rose for Emily". Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association, 24(1), 3-13.

Nguyen, H., McIntyre-Mills, J. J., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (2022). Gender Roles in Vietnam: A Metalogue on the Traditional and the New and Suggestions for Transformation. In Transformative Education for Regeneration and Wellbeing: A Critical Systemic Approach to Support Multispecies Relationships and Pathways to Sustainable Environments (pp. 177-195). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Onebunne, J. I. (2023). African Philosophy of Arts and Literature. Nnadiebube Journal of Languages and Literatures, 1(1). https://www.enotes.com/topics/rose-emily/questions/what-is-the-conflict-in-a-rose-for-emily-by-444055.

Pierre-Robertson, P. (2021). Literature as an Agent of Change. In Gender and Domestic Violence in the Caribbean (pp. 87-103). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Rana, M. M., & Rashid, A. (2020). Feminist literary criticism: A paradigm of matriarchy in literature. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 10(2), 93-97.

Ryu, D. Y. (2016). The Expression of Sublime in Gothic Novel-William Faulkner's A Rose for Emily. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(5), 137-145.

Sahu, R. (2022). Literature as an Instrument of Social Change: A Reflective Study of Rabindranath Tagore’s Select Short Stories. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research.

Saravanan, S. (2018). The Postcolonial Paradox and Feminist Solidarity. A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India, 129-157.

Savvias, G. A. (2022). Comments on Intersectionality. Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research, 15(1).

Scot, M. (2020). New Feminist Debates. Powers, 173(2), 101-116.

Sen, T., & Das, K. (2021). Salient Features of Feminist Literary Criticism. Shanlax International Journal of English, 10(1), 20-24.

Sharma, R. (2022). Literary Maxim as a Catalyst in Cultural Edification. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 48-57.

Singh, J. (2022). Feminist Literary and Cultural Criticism: An Analytical Approach to Space. Springer Nature Singapore.

Srilakshmi, J. (2023). Reflection of Gender Encounters in the Society Portrayed in Literature. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences.

Suleman, N., Zahra, T., & Fatima, M. (2023). A Feminist Stylistic Analysis of Virginia Woolf's A Room of One's Own. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(2), 1786-1791.

Sultan, A. A. M. H. (2023). Post-American Civil-War Psychological Trauma in William Faulkner's A Rose for Emily. Journal of the Faculty of Arts in Qena, 32 (58), 179- 214.

Thai, P. V. A. (2016). Contemporary Vietnamese Fiction Written About the War from The Gender Perspective. Language and Arts Journal of Language Literature Arts and Teaching, 44(1):010-017.

Truong, T. M. V. (2013). Literature in Vietnamese tertiary English programs: perspectives and practice (Doctoral dissertation, Monash University).

Vandenberghe, F. (2023). “Domestic Houseflies” and “Giant Cucumbers”: Virginia Woolf’s Feminist Literary Criticism and Women Writers of the Long Eighteenth Century. Women's Writing, 30(2), 91-108.

Vo, Q. H. (2022). Vietnamese Literature and Ecofeminism. In The Routledge Handbook of Ecofeminism and Literature (pp. 46-56). Routledge.

Weiser, P. B. (2022). Feminist Criticism: On Disturbatory Art and Beauty. A Companion to Arthur C. Danto, 345-354.

Wolff, K. (2007). Psychoanalytic Feminism. The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology, 1- 5.

Wren, R. M. (2015). African American Literature. Literature and Politics Today, 4.

Yu, W. (2023). The Battle between Community and Its Nonconformists - A Comparison between Sula and Emily in Their Relationships with the Communities. Journal of Social Science Studies, 10(1), 1-50.

Zhang, Y. (2016). A Rose Will Never Bloom: Doomed Tragedy of Miss Emily. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2016) (pp. 19-22). Atlantis Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejls.v5i2.522

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018-2023. European Journal of Literary Studies (ISSN 2601-971X / ISSN-L 2601-971X). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.