PROPOSAL OF A TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL: ADOPTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MOROCCAN SMES
Abstract
This article proposes a new model based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to study the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in Moroccan small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It aims to identify and analyze the key factors influencing this adoption, taking into account the specific features and challenges of Moroccan SMEs. By integrating elements such as technological understanding, ease of use, and perceived usefulness, this model offers an in-depth perspective on how Moroccan SMEs can effectively integrate AI into their strategies and operations.
JEL: O33, L86, L26, L53
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agerri R., Bermudez J., Rigau G. (2014). Multilingual, efficient and easy NLP processing with IXA Pipeline. In: Proceedings of the demonstrations at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 5-8. Retrieved from http://ixa.si.ehu.es/sites/default/files/dokumentuak/3287/eacl2014-ixa-pipes.pdf
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Barton M., Budjac R., Tanuska P., Gaspar G., Schreiber P. (2022). Identification overview of Industry 4.0 essential attributes and resource-limited embedded artificial-intelligence-of-things devices for small and medium-sized enterprises. Appl Sci 12:5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115672
Bauer M., Dinther C., Kiefer D. (2020). Machine learning in SME: an empirical study on enablers and success factors. In: AMCIS 2020 Proceedings 1-10. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344651203_Machine_Learning_in_SME_An_Empirical_Study_on_Enablers_and_Success_Factors
Bhuvaneshwari A. S. K. M., Mishrikoti A. H. (2019). Lean practices in SMEs towards improvement in production performance: A research. Int J Recent Technol Eng 8(2S3): 959-965. Retrieved from https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i2S3/B11800782S319.pdf
Cubric M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: a tertiary study. Technol Soc. 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Delbridge, R., & Fiss, P. C. (Eds.). (2013). Editors' comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 325-331. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43700493
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3
Dupont, B., Shearing, C., Bernier, M., & Leukfeldt, R. (2023). The tensions of cyber-resilience: From sensemaking to practice. Computers & Security, 132, 103372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103372
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233897090_Belief_attitude_intention_and_behaviour_An_introduction_to_theory_and_research
Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4). 465-485. https://doi.org/10.2307/249629
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Jain V., Tewary T., Gopalakrishnan B. N. (2021). Unlocking technology adoption for a robust food supply chain: evidence from Indian food processing sector. HSE Econ J 25(1):147-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-1-147-164
Kumar, A., Bezawada, R., Rishika, R., Janakiraman, R., & Kannan, P. K. (2016). From social to sale: The effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 7-25. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43785256
Marino-Romero, J. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Velicia-Martín, F. (2024). Evolution of digital transformation in SMEs management through a bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123014. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123014
Martin, K. (2019). Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics 160(1) Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10551-018-3921-3
Mittal S., Khan M. A., Romero D., Wuest T. (2018). A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). J Manuf Syst 49:194-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005
Oldemeyer, L., Jede, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2024). Investigation of artificial intelligence in SMEs: a systematic review of the state of the art and the main implementation challenges. Management Review Quarterly, 1-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00405-4
Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Gerbert, P., & Reeves, M. (2017). Reshaping business with artificial intelligence: Closing the gap between ambition and action. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(1). Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/reshaping-business-with-artificial-intelligence/
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Szedlak C, Poetters P., Leyendecker B. (2020). Application of artificial intelligence in small and medium-sized enterprises. In: Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management. Retrieved from http://www.ieomsociety.org/detroit2020/papers/367.pdf
Teerasoponpong S., Sopadang A. (2021). A simulation-optimization approach for adaptive manufacturing capacity planning in small and medium-sized enterprises. Expert Syst Appl 168:114451.
Teo, T., & van Schaik, P. (2012). Understanding the intention to use technology by pre-service teachers: An empirical test of competing theoretical models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 178-188. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.581892
Ulrich P., Frank V. (2021). Relevance and adoption of AI technologies in German SMEs-results from survey-based research. Proced Comput Sci 192:2152-2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.228
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016). Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 97-121. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0413
Zhang D., Maslej N., Brynjolfsson E. (2022). The AI index 2022 annual report. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, AI Index Steering Committee. Retrieved from https://aiindex.stanford.edu/ai-index-report-2022/
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v8i6.1858
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Salma Erraoui, Abderrahmane Amine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal of Economic and Financial Research (ISSN 2501-9430) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.