Kazeem Bolayemi Akinbola, Azlina Md Yassin, Wan Zahari Wan Yusoff


Land has been variously acknowledged as a perennial harbinger of socio-economic power that exudes prestige and class. It is the foundation for food and shelter, driving the very bedrock that significantly provides for most employment opportunities in the country side. Regrettably, as global urbanisation trends soars uncontrollably, land is rapidly becoming increasingly scarce assets in cities. Therefore, supplying of and demand for lands, especially within urban spheres, are though unfortunately never at equilibrium, but the present scenarios in formal window of urban land market, which is solely responsible for the supply of formal land for various developmental purposes, has been very unimpressive. This simply, has rendered delivery to be at its lowest ebb, such that accessibility, which is the measure of demand coefficients from the part of the various land users, to be hampered, the resultant effects of which  is consistent decrease of the real estate stock. Hence, it is in astounding recognition of the above ugly scenario that this study was conducted, primarily to validate the potentialities of SLADECOM model which is an end product of a doctoral research. Essentially, this model is meant to remove all the established barriers that are rendering the supply side (i.e delivery) as well as the demand side (i.e accessibility) of the formal market for urban lands, so sub-optimal. Moreover, the following constructs and variables that survived the statistical screening exercise were coined as components of this Sladecom model for empirical validation, such as: structural and culturo-behavioural dynamics (scbd), socio-political and economic dictates (sped), human techno-analytical arsenals (htaa), policy relevance and appropriateness (pra), contents and context of policies (ccp) and role mediation regime (rmr).Furthermore, validation, which is unlike just any other survey, requires high level of integrity, as results from it are almost laws in their plausibility, which simply suggests that respondents with huge experience, towering knowledge and consummate understanding of the issues involved in the subject matter are carefully selected for data collection. Out of the rough total of over 500 individuals considered as the total population for the sample space, 205 individuals qualified for the sample frame, from which the sample size of 120 was chosen, upon which the structured questionnaires were distributed. Therefore, after necessary integrity checks, 92 out 107 questionnaires that were retrieved, were found to be valid, thus formed the denominator for the analyses, using 5 point Likert scale of measurement, corroborated with pie-charts for stronger inferential and descriptive statistical results and explanations. The findings amongst other things are that this model has great potential to drastically reduce multiple roles partitioning among formal land administration machineries and thus increases the speed, quality and quantity of service delivery to prospective teeming land users. Among the recommendations is that decisive actions must be expeditiously taken on generating more functional databases and also increase the frequency of contents updating of these databases. This will no doubt improve the technical prowess of formal land administration machineries, with resultant capability to address myriad of challenges of formal land delivery and accessibility in Nigeria. 


JEL: R14, R52, R31


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



validation, SLADECOM model, contemporary panacea, formal land market improvement, Nigeria


Akinbola, K. B., Yassin, A. M. and Olajide, S. E. (2015). Review of formal accessibility of urban lands for sustainable development of residential facilities in Nigeria. In Global built environment in transition. Proceedings of the 9th Asean postgraduate research conference (APGS2015), organised and held at The Faculty of The Built Environment, University of Malaya, , 8th December, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Akinbola, K. B. and Md Yassin, A. (2016). Gauging the impacts of interrelationship between regulo-administrative machineries on formal land accessibility in Nigeria. In Towards adaptive, resilient and sustainable built environment. Proceedings of the 10th Asean postgraduate research conference (APGS2016), organised and held at The Faculty of The Built Environment, University of Malaya, 15th November, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Akinbola, K. B. (2017). Land administration and regulation model for improved formal delivery and accessibility of urban lands for residential projects in Nigeria. An unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Real Estate and Facilities Management, Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia.

Aluko, B. T. and Amidu, A. (2006). Urban low-income settlements, land deregulation and sustainable development in Nigeria, being paper presented at ‘Promoting land administration and good governance’, 5th FIG Regional Conference, Accra, Ghana. International Federation of Surveyors. March, 8-11.

Atwood, D.A. (1990): ‘Land registration in Africa: The impact on agricultural production.’ World Development, 18 (5): 659-71.

Bandeira, P., Sumpsi, J. M., & Falconi, C. (2010). Land use policy evaluating land administration systems: a comparative method with an application to Peru and Honduras. Land Use Policy, 27, 351–363.

Bennett, R., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2008). Organising land information for sustainable land administration. Land Use Policy, 25(1), 126–138.

Bruce, J. W. (1998b). Review of tenure terminology. Tenure brief No.1. Land Tenure Centre, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Dale, P., and McLaughlin, J. (1999). Land administration and spatial information systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dia, M. (1996). Africa’s management in the 1990s and beyond: Reconciling indigenous and transplanted institutions. Washington D.C: World Bank.

Fabiyi, Y. L. (1990). Land policy for Nigeria: Issues and perspectives, an inaugural lecture delivered at Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, June 12.

FAO/FIG. (2008). Capacity assessment in land administration. Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors.

Federal Office of Statistics (2012): “Annual abstract of statistics” 2012 edition, Abuja, Nigeria.

Herbst, J. (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Karika, I., Stillwell, J. & Carver, S. (2003). Land administration and GIS: The case of Ghana. Progress in Development Studies, 3(3), 223-242.

Li, W., Feng, T. & Hao, J. (2009). The evolving concepts of land administration in China: Cultivated land protection perspective. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 262-272.

Lidsay, J. (2002). Land in law and sustainable development since Rio: Legal trends in agriculture and natural resource management. FAO Legislative Studies, 73(8).

Molen, P. (2002). The dynamic aspect of land administration: an often-forgotten component in system design. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, 361–381.

Oderinde, J. A. (2008): Socio-economic implications of population growth on urban environment in Nigeria. In the 21st Century Environment, being paper presented at the first national conference organised by the school of environmental studies, the Federal Polytechnic, Ilaro, Nigeria. October 8th-10th.

Omirin, M. M. (2003). Issues in land accessibility in Nigeria. In Land Management and Property Tax Reform in Nigeria. A book of readings (Ed) Nubi, T.O and Omirin, M.M. Department of Estate Management, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Lagos, Nigeria. pp 49-70.

Quan, J., Tan, S.F and Toulmin, C (2004). Land in Africa: Market asset or secure livelihood?. Proceedings and summary of conclusions from the Land in Africa Conference held in London, November 8-9. Organised by International Institute of Environment and Development/NRI/RAS, London.

Rakodi, C. and Leduka, C. (2003). Informal land delivery processes and access to land for the poor in six African cities: Towards a conceptual framework. International Development Department, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, pp 8-10 downloaded from

Ray, D. I. (1999). Globalization and traditional authority in Africa: Investment, security and land in Ghana. In Globalization: Policies, Challenges and Responses. Shereen T. Ismael. (Ed.) Alberta: Detselig Enterprises Ltd. pp. 125-42.

Toulmin, C. (2008). Securing land and property rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of local institutions. Land Use Policy, 26, 10-19.

United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNECAP) (2000) Urban Land Policies for the Human Settlement Uninitiated.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Kazeem Bolayemi Akinbola, Azlina Md Yassin, Wan Zahari Wan Yusoff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.