CAPITAL SIMBÓLICO E FAMÍLIA EMPRESÁRIA / SYMBOLIC CAPITAL AND ENTREPRENEURIAL FAMILY
Abstract
O artigo aborda o estado da arte do capital simbólico e família empresária, contribuindo para uma compreensão mais aprofundada dos conceitos que lhe estão subjacentes. A estratégia de investigação prosseguida socorreu-se da “teoria da prática” de Bourdieu, procurando uma visão inovadora do que se passa no campo em análise. Como principais resultados aponta-se para um conjunto de dez questões, as quais poderão ser valorizadas, podendo ser incluídas num modelo integrador de várias dimensões, suficientemente genérico e abrangente, para que o mesmo possa ser aplicado a qualquer tipo de família empresária.
The article discusses the state of the art of symbolic capital and the businesses family, contributing to a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts. The research strategy pursued relied on Bourdieu's "theory of practice", seeking an innovative view of what is happening in the field under analysis. The main results point to a set of ten questions, which can be valued and can be included in an integrating model of several dimensions, sufficiently generic and comprehensive, so that it can be applied to any type of businesses family.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Accardo, Alain (2006), Introduction à une sociologie critique: Lire Pierre Bourdieu, 3ème ed., Marseille, Agone
Adler, Paul S., Seok-Woo Kwon (2002), “Social capital: Prospects for a new concept”, Academy of Management Review, 27 (1): 17-40
Arregle, Jean-Luc, Michael A. Hitt, David G. Simon e Philippe Very (2007), “The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms”, Journal of Management Studies, 44 (1): 73-95
Barney, Jay B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120
Barney, Jay B. (1986), “Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an Integrative framework”, Academy of Management Review, 11 (4): 791-800
Bingham, John B., W. Gibb Dyer Jr., Isaac Smith e Gregory L. Adams (2011), “A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, 99 (4): 565-585
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998 [1997]), Méditations pascaliennes, Paris, Éditions du Seuil (tradução Miguel Serras Pereira, Meditações Pascalianas, Oeiras, Celta Editora
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993), ”Some properties of fields”, in Pierre Bourdieu (ed.), Sociologie in question, London, Sage, pp 72-77
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990 [1987]), Coisas ditas, São Paulo, Editora Brasiliense, 234
Bourdieu, Pierre (1989), O poder simbólico, Lisboa, Difel, 311
Bourdieu, Pierre (1986), “Habitus, code et codification”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 64 (De que droit?): 40-44
Bourdieu, Pierre (1980), “Le capital social – notes provisoires”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 31 (Le capital social): 2-3
Bourdieu, Pierre (1979), “Les trois états du capital culturel”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 30 (L’institution scolaire): 3-6
Bourdieu, Pierre (1978), “Capital symbolique et classes sociales”, L’Arc 72: 13-19
Bourdieu, Pierre (1971), “Le marché des biens symboliques”, L'Année sociologique, 22: 49-126
Cano-Rubio, Myriam, Guadalupe Fuentes-Lombardo, María Jesús Hernández-Ortiz e Manuel Carlos Vallejo-Martos (2016), “Composition of familiness: Perspectives of social capital and open systems”, European Journal Family Business, 6 (2): 75-85
Carney, Michael (2005), “Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (3): 249-265
Chrisman, James J., Jess H. Chua, Alfredo De Massis, Tommaso Minola e Silvio Vismara (2016), “Management processes and strategy execution in family firms: from ‘‘what’’ to ‘‘how’’”, Small Bussiness Economics, 47 (3):719-734
Chrisman, James J., Jess H. Chua e Reginald Litz (2003), “A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration”, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4): 467-472
Chua, Jess H., James J. Chrisman e Pramodita Sharma (1999), “Defining the family business by behavior”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (4): 19-39
Eddleston, Kimberly A., James J. Chrisman, Lloyd P. Steier e Jess H. Chua (2010), “Governance and trust in family firms: An introduction”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (6): 1043-1056
Ensley, Michael D. e Allison W. Pearson (2005), “An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (3): 267-284
Frank, Hermann, Alexander Kessler, Thomas Rusch, Julia Suess-Reyes e Daniela Weismeier-Sammer (2017), “Capturing the familiness of family businesses: Development of the family influence familiness scale (FIFS)”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41 (5): 709-742
Gallo, Miguel Angel, Sabine Klein, Daniela Montemerlo, Salvatore Tomaselli e Kristin Cappuyns (2009), La empresa multigeracional: El papel de la família proprietária, Pamplona, Ediciones Universidad de Navarra
Gersick, Kelin E., John A. Davis, Marion M. McCollom e Ivan Lansberg (1997), De geração para geração: Ciclos de vida das empresas familiares, 3ª ed., São Paulo, Negócio Editora
Gioia, Dennis A., Kevin G. Corley e Hamilton, Aimee L. (2013), “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology”, Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1): 15-31
Gioia, Dennis A., Majken Schultz e Kevin G. Corley (2000), “Organizational identity, image, and adaptative instability”, Academy of Management Review, 25 (1): 63-81
Gioia, Dennis A. e Kummar Chittipeddi (1991), “Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation”, Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6): 433-448
Goel, Sanjay e Raymond J. Jones III (2016), “Entrepreneurial exploration and exploit-ation in family business: A systematic review and future directions”, Family Business Review, 29 (1): 94-120
Gómez-Mejía, Luis R., Katalin Takács Haynes, Manuel Núñez-Nickel, Kathyrn J. L. Jacobson e José Moyano-Fuentes (2007), “Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (1): 106-137
Gordon, Cameron e Shaun Cheah (2014), “Inter-firm relationships and the creation of social capital”, Journal of Applied Business and Ec nomics, 16 (3): 90-100
Habbershon, Timothy G., Mathias Nordqvist e Thomas M. Zellweger (2010), Trangene-rational entrepreneurship, in Nordqvist et Zellweger (Eds.). Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring growth and performance in family firms across generations, Edgard Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2-37
Habbershon, Timothy G., Mary L. Williams e Ian C. MacMillan (2003), "A unified systems perspective of family firm performance", Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4): 451-465
Habbershon, Timothy G. e Mary L. Williams (1999), “A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms”, Family Business Review, 12 (1): 1-25
Harms, Henrik (2014), “Review of family definitions: Cluster approach and implications of heterogeneous applications for family business research”, International Journal of Financial Studies, 2 (3): 280-314
Hoffman, James, Mark Hoelscher e Ritch Sorenson (2006), “Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory”, Family Business Review, 19 (2): 135-145
Kellermanns, Franz; Jorge Walter, T. Russell Crook, Benedict Kemmerer e Vadake Narayanan (2016), “The resourced-based view in entrepreneurship: A content-analytical comparison of researches’ and entrepreneurs’ views”, Journal of Small Business Management, 54 (1): 26-48
Klein, Sabine B. (2000), “Family businesses in Germany: Structure and significance”, Family Business Review, 13 (3): 157-181
Leana, Carrie R. e Harry J. van Buren (1999), “Organizational social capital and employment practices”, Academy of Management Review, 24 (3): 538-555
Lee, Tingko (2019), “Management ties and firm performance: Influence of family governance”, Journal of Family Business Strategy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.12.003
Lima, Antónia Pedroso de (2003), “Relações familiares na elite empresarial de Lisboa”, in PINTO, António Costa, FREIRE, André (Org.) (2003). Elites, Sociedade e Mudança Política, Celta Editora, Lisboa, pp151-180
Magueijo, João (2003). Faster than the Speed of Light (tradução portuguesa de Paulo Ivo Teixeira, Mais rápido que a luz, Gradiva, Lisboa, Maio de 2003)
Martinez, Luís Carlos Sánchez (2012), “Dividendo emocional: el papel de los acionistas en la responsabilidad empresarial”, Revista de Responsabilidad Social de la Empresa, 12 (vol. 4, nº 3); 15-45
Nahapiet, Janine e Sumantra Ghoshal (1998), “Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242-266
Nordstrom, Onnolee Anne e Lloyd Steier (2015), “Social capital: A review of its dimensions and promise for future family enterprise research”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 21 (6): 801-813
Olson, David H. (2000), “Circumplex model of marital and family therapy systems”, Journal of Family Therapy, 22 (2): 144-167
Olson, Patricia. D., Virginia S. Zuiker, Sharon M. Danes, Kathryn Stafford, Ramona K. Z. Heck e Karen A. Duncan (2003), “The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability”, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (5): 639-666
Pearson, Allison W., Jon C. Carr e John C. Shaw (2008), “Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6): 949-969
Pessoa, Fernando (1926), “Palavras iniciais”, Revista de Comércio e Contabilidade, 4, 1-2
Pieper, Torsten M., Anne D. Smith, Jerry Kudlats e Joseph H. Astrachan (2015), “The persistence of multifamily firms: founder imprinting, simple rules, and monitoring processes”, Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39 (6): 1313-1337
Pieper, Torsten M. e Sabine B. Klein (2007), “The Bulleye: A systems approach to modeling family firms”, Family Business Review, 20 (4): 301-319
Portes, Alejandro (1998), “Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1-24
Rau, Sabine B., Joseph H. Astracham e Kosmas X. Smyrnios (2018), “The F-PEC revisited: From the family business definition dilema to foudation of theory”, Family Business Review, 31 (2): 200-213
Rautiainen, Marita, Timo Pihkala e Markku Ikävalko (2012), “Family business system models - A case study and some implications of open systems perspective”, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 25 (2): 155-168
Rogoff, Edward G. e Ramona Kay Zachary Heck (2003), “Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (5): 559-566
Sharma, Pramodita e S. Manikutty (2001), “Strategic Divestments in Family Firms: Role of Family Structure and Community Culture”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (3): 237-349
Sirmon, David G. e Michael A. Hitt (2003), “Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (4): 339-358
Sorenson, Ritch L. e Leonard Bierman (2009), “Family capital, family business, and free enterprise”, Family Business Review, 22 (3): 193-195
Sorenson, Ritch L. (1999), “Conflit management strategies used in sucessful family”, Family Business Review, 12 (2): 133-146
Steier, Lloyd P., James J. Chrisman e Jess H. Chua (2015), “Governance challenges in family businesses and business families”, Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39 (6): 1265-1280
Stryker, Sheldon e Peter J. Burker (2000), “The past, present and future of an identity theory”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 63 (4): 284-297
Tagiuri, Renato e John A. Davis (1992), “On the goals of successful family companies”, Family Business Review, 5 (1): 43-62
Thiry-Cherques, Hermano Roberto (2006), “Pierre Bourdieu: a teoria na prática”, Revista de Administração Pública, 40 (1): 27-55
Wernerfelt, Birger (1984), “The resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2): 171-180
Zahra, Shaker A. (2005), “Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms”, Family Business Review, 18 (1): 23-40
Zellweger, Thomas, Kimberly A. Eddleston e Franz W. Kellermanns (2010), “Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity”, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1 (1): 54-63
Zellweger, Thomas M. e Robert S. Nason (2008), “A Stakeholder Perspective on Family Firm Performance” Family Business Review, 21 (3): 203-216
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v7i4.1307
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jorge Rodrigues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
