CRITIQUE OF ANTI-ORGANIZATION THEORY BASED ON ITS PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS (FUNDAMENTAL HUMANIST PARADIGM)

Bijan Abdollahi, Bahare Shahriari

Abstract


The present article examines and criticizes anti-organization theory based on its philosophical foundations, which is found in the fundamental humanism paradigm; that a transient review is done on Borrel and Morgan's sociological paradigms (functionalism, interpretiveism, fundamentalist structuralism and fundamental humanism). The purpose of this article is to review the anti-organization theory and its viewpoint on organizational life and human resources and to describe the quadruple sociological paradigms. This theory acts in its own sphere of thought, and it must be said that it has a new look at the reality of organizational life and human resources. Finally, there is a review of the criticisms raised in the anti-organization theory about the organization's theory, which is in the form of a functional paradigm.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


anti-organization theory, paradigm, functionalist paradigm, paradigm of fundamental humanism, interpretative paradigm, structural fundamentalism paradigm

References


Azad Armaki. Taghi (2004), Theories of Sociology, Soroush, Tehran

Borille Gibson, Morgan. Garrot, (2014), Sociological and Sociological Theories and Organization Analysis, Translation: Nowruz. Mohammad Taghi, Publishing SAMT, Tehran

Castanda, C. (1970), The Teaching of Don Juan: A Yacqui Way of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Peguin.

Dilthey, W. (1967), Selected Writings (ed. H. P. Rickman). London: Cambridge University Press.

Ebrahim Pour. Habib (2006), The Philosophical Foundations of Organizational and Management Theories with Functional and Structuralist Approach, Management Culture, Qom, No. 13

Gibson, Bill. (2002), "An Essay on late Structuralism", Vermant University Press. www.uvm.edu

Gramesci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (eds. Quinton Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith). London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Illich, I. (1973), Tools for Conviviality. London: Fontana/Collins.

Khaleqi. Amir Hossein (2012), An Investigation of Multidisciplinary and Sub-Paradigmatic Approaches to Organizational Studies, Development Management Process, Tehran, No 2

Laing, R.D. (1967), the Politics of Experience. New York: Ballantine.

Lukacs, G. (1971), History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin. (First published 1923)

Marcuse, H. (1964), One Dimensional Man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Marcuse, H. (1966), Eros and Civilization. Boston: Beacon.

Marcuse, H. (1968), Industrialisation and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber’, negations: Essays in Critical Theory, op. cit.

Marcuse, H. (1968), Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. London: Heinemann.

Marx, K. (1975), Early Writings (trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton). Harmondsworth: Penguin. (This contains Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, 1844)

Mirzai Aharenjani, Hassan. (2014), The Philosophical Foundations of Organization Theory, Tehran, SAMT.

Morgan, G. (2006), Images of organization. Thousand oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

Parsons, T. (1951), the Social System. London: Tavistock; Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.

Ritzer, G. (2001), Explorations in Social Theory, From Metatheorizing to Rationalization. London: SAGE Publications.

Sartre, J. P. (1948), Existentialism ad Humanism (trans. P. Mairet). London: Methuen.

Tavasoli. Ghulam Abbas (2005), Sociology Theories, SAMT, Tehran

Webber, M. (1947), the Theory of Social and Economic Organization (trans. A. Henderson and T. Parsons), Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.

Zimmerman, D.H. (1970), the Practicalities of Rule Use, in J. D. Douglas, ed., Understanding Everyday Life, op. cit.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v0i0.228

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Bijan Abdollahi, Bahare Shahriari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.