INVESTIGATING THE NUMBERING OF TECHNICAL MAPS AND NUMBERING OF PARTS IN THE WORLD AIR INDUSTRY - PROVIDING A NATIVE MODEL FOR IRAN'S AIR INDUSTRY AND GENERALIZING IT TO OTHER INDUSTRIES

Morteza Shariati Firoz Abad, Mohammad Reza Kabaran Zadeh Ghadim, Mohammad Ali Rostamian

Abstract


In recent years, Iran's domestic air companies, which have been involved in aircraft repair, have been designing and manufacturing various types of bird products by establishing design offices and technology development centers. An important issue is the lack of a comprehensive and standardized system used in the country's air industry. The main objective of this research is to review the numbering systems of technical drawings and numbering of parts in the world air industry and provide a native model for the Iranian airline industry. The purpose of this research is in the field of applied research, and field methods such as questionnaires have been used. The statistical society of the design and manufacture of bird equipment is at the level of the airline industry in Iran. The Delphi method has been used to examine and conclude the proposed model. Based on the results of the implementation of the numbering system, it is possible to systematize the process of designing and constructing an aircraft, and as a result, it facilitates the coordination between the design unit and the units of construction and repair, and due to reduced design errors and structural defects in sets and parts of the product It improves the quality and reduces costs in the company, and subsequently improves the reliability of the aircraft and profitability of the company. It is suggested that executive instructions and the processes for mapping and subscribing to the organizations at stake level be developed.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


technical map numbering, parts numbering, world aircraft industry

References


Ambrose S., Huston, T., Norman, M. (2005). A qualitative method for assessing faculty satisfaction, Res. Higher Educ., Vol. 46, No. 7,pp. 803−830.

Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human resource Management Practice, Tenth Edition, Kogan Page Publishing, London, p.264

Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98(5), pp. 893-921.

Belias, D., & Koustelios, A. (2014). Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction: A Review. International Review of Management and Marketing Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.132-149.

Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. J. (2009). How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology (Vol. 90, pp. 192-199): Journal of Development Economics.

Busenitz, L.W. & Barney, J.W. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12(1), pp. 9-30.

Cahill, D. (1996). Entrepreneurial orientation or pioneer advantage. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21(3), pp.603–605.

Casson, M.C. & Wadeson, N. (2007). The Discovery of Opportunities: Extending the Economic Theory of the Entrepreneur. Small Business Economics, Vol. 28(4), pp. 285-300.

Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2009). A framework for technology management activities, Technovation Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability (Vol. 29, pp. 237-246).

Companys Y., & McMullen J. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurs at work: the nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Small Business Economics, Vol. 28(4), pp. 301–322.

Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelberg, W.C. (1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7(1), pp. 53-68.

Covin, J. G., & Miles, M.P. (1999). Corporate Entrepreneurship and Pursuit of Competitive Advantage. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 23(3), pp. 47-64.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10(1), pp. 75-87.

Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 25(4), pp. 81-100.

Ekhtiardzadeh, Ahmad (1390). Irankod, from concept to application. Tehran: University Jahad (Amirkabir University of Technology).

Green, K.M., Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (2008). Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 23(3), pp. 356-383.

17. Gholamzadeh, Ahmad. (1377). Classification and Coding of Goods: Tools for improving logistics management information system. Tehran: Imam Hossein University Press and Publishing Institute.

Harrison, R.T., & Leitch, C.M. (1996). Discipline emergence in entrepreneurship: Accumulative fragmentalism or paradigmatic science? Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change, Vol. 5(2), pp. 65–83.

Hills G.E, Lumpkin G.T, & Singh R.P. (1997). Opportunity recognition: perceptions and behaviors of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Vol. 17, pp. 168–182.

Hindle K. (2004). A practical strategy for discovering, evaluating, and exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities: research-based action guidelines. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 17, pp. 267–276.

Hughes, M. & Morgan, R.E. (2007). Deconstructing the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance at the Embryonic Stage of Firm Growth. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 36(5), pp. 651-661.

ISIC. (2008). International Standard Industrial Classification of all Economic Activities.

Keh, H.T., Nguyen, T.T.M., Ng, H.P. (2007). The Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Marketing Information on the Performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 22(4), pp. 592-611.

Khandwalla, P. N. (1976). Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 7(4), pp. 21-51.

Khandwalla, P.N. (1977). The Design of Organizations, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

NATO. (2014). Manual on Codification (ACodP-1).

Shane, S. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Shahnazi, Ruhollah. (1391). Effective factors on the production of high technology industries in the knowledge economy Technological growth, 33, 10.

Zhao, H., Tong, X., Wong, P. K., & Zhu, J. (2005). An exploratory study of Singapore manufacturing firms Types of technology sourcing and innovative capability (Vol. 16, pp. 209-224).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v0i0.274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Morteza Shariati Firoz Abad, Mohammad Reza Kabaran Zadeh Ghadim, Mohammad Ali Rostamian

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.