MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR OF LECTURERS: THE ROLE OF PERSONALITY AND LOCUS OF CONTROL

Chukwuemeka A. F. Okoye, Leonard N. Ezeh, C. J. Mbanugo, C. E. Etodike

Abstract


This study examined the influence of personality and work-locus of control on lecturers’ organizational citizenship behaviour. A total of 204 participants (75 females and 129 males) selected through simple random sampling technique were drawn from Federal Polytechnics Oko Anambra State, Nigeria as participants of the study. Their ages ranged from 27 to 67 years with a mean age of 49.43 years and a standard deviation of 9.82. A cross sectional survey design was employed for the study while two-way Analysis of variance statistic was used for data analysis. The result revealed a significant main effect for personality at F (4,194) = 4.15, p < .05. Extraverted lecturers had more tendencies to practice OCB than open to new experience and agreeable lecturers, as well as conscientious lecturers. However, no significant influence for work locus of control (M=1,194) = 0.67>.05 with the internal locus of control participants (m =121.05, SD = 32.77), was observed on tendency to practice OCB than their external (M. 121. 64, SD = 25.41) counterparts. Also, the result showed no significant interaction effect between personality factors and work-locus of control on lecturers’ citizenship behaviour, F (4, 194) =1.08 AT p<.05. It recommended that Nigerian tertiary institutions use psychometric evaluation in lecturers’ selection process in order to take advantage of those more likely to exhibit citizenship behaviour.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


organizational citizenship behaviour, personality, work-locus of control, university lecturers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnard, C.I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Press.

Bateman, T.S. & Organ, D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.

Borman, W.C. Smith, M.J, & Motowildo, S.J. (1997). A theory, individual differences and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83.

Brief, A.P. & Motowildo, S.J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviours. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725.

Chen, X.P, Hui, C; & Sego, D.J. (1998). The role of organizational citizenship behaviour in turnover: conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 922-931.

Cropanzano, R; & Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.

Davies, G. (1974). On the contribution of organizational analysis to the study of educational institutions. In R. Brown (Ed), knowledge, education and cultural change. London, Tavistock.

Deci, E.L; & Ryan, R.M. (2012). The “what” and “why” of good pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4) 227-268.

Dipaola, M & Morgan, M.T. (2001). Organizational citizenship behavior in schools and its relationship to school climate. MA: Harvard

Elanain, H.A. (2007). Relationship between personality and organizational citizenship behavior: Does personality influence employee citizenship? International Review of Business Research, 3(4), 31-43.

Farooqni, M.R. (2012). Measuring organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as a consequence of organizational climate (OC). Chicago: AI

George, J.M; & Belteuhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sale performance and turnover: A group level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709.

George, J.M. & Brief, A.P. (1992). Feeling and doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329.

George, J.M. & Jones, G.B. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10, 153-170.

Hossan, M; & Elanain, A. (2010). Work locus of control and interactional justice as mediators of the relationship between openness to experience and organizational citizenship behavior: cross cultural management. An Emerald International Journal, 17(2), 179-196.

Jahangir, N; Akbar, M.M. & Haq, M. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents. BRAC University Journal, 1(2) 75-85.

Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioural Science, 9, 131-146.

Katz, D.L. & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

Katz, D.L. & Kahn, R.L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.

Klassen, M.R. & Chiu, M.M. (2010). Effect of teachers’ self-efficiency and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress: Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 741-756.

Korman, A.K. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and extension: Academy of Management Review, 1, 50-63.

Kumar, K. Bakhshi, A. & Rani, E. (2009). Linking the “Big Five” personality domains to organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 1(2), 13-19

Konovsky, M.A. & Organ, D.W. (1996). Dispositonal and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253-266.

MaCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.J. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.

McCrae, R.R.; & John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the five factor model and its application. New York: Reilly

Miller, N. (2002). Insider change leadership in schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5, 343-360.

Nor, A. (2009). Examining organizational citizenship behavior as the outcome of organizational commitment: A study of university teachers in Pakistan: Proceedings 2nd CBRC, Lahore, Pakistan.

Okediji, A.A.; Esin, PA.; Sanni, K.B & Umoh, O.O. (2009). Personality dimension and organizational citizenship behaviour. Global Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2) 69-76.

Oplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: towards an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational citizenship behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 385-423.

Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Lexington, MA.: D.C. Heath and Co.

Organ, D.W. (1990b). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.

Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. & Mackenize, S.B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature, antecedents and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage publication.

Passer, M.W, & Smith, R.E. (2001). Psychology, frontiers and application. Von. Hoffmann Press, Inc.

Spector, P.E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology; 61, 335-340.

Spector, P.E. (1982). Behavior in organization as a function of employees’ locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482-497.

Spector, P.E.; Cooper, C.L. Sanchez, J. I; O’Driscoll, M; & Sparks, K. (2002). Locus of control and wellbeing at work: How generalizeable are western findings? Academy of Managerial Journal 45(2) 453-466.

Somech, A. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behaviour in schools: the impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 38-66.

Somech, A; & Ron; I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: the impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 5, 1-29.

Van Dyne, L; Cummings, L.L & Parks, J. (1995). Extra-role behaviour: In pursuit of construct and definition clarity. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 17, 215-285.

Zhu, Y. (2012). The action mechanism of social exchange relationship perception on organizational citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Business Administration, 3,(2) 1923-4015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v0i0.331

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Chukwuemeka A. F. Okoye, Leonard N. Ezeh, C. J. Mbanugo, C. E. Etodike

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.