ORGANIZATIONAL TOUGHNESS FACING NEW ECONOMIC CRISIS

João Manuel da Silva Carvalho

Abstract


Organizations are increasingly facing great changes in their external environment, like is the case of current pandemic. Theoretical reflection and scientific literature review led us to develop a new concept – organizational toughness - and a new model that may help explaining the variables underlying an effective response to environmental changes, contributing to the organization's survival. This model also includes the concepts of organizational plasticity and organizational strength as crucial factors to face new market threats and opportunities. Other second order latent variables – staff preparation and structure adapted to change – and manifest variables, such as the quality level of competencies, motivation, flexibility, strategic planning processes, leadership behaviours, organizational learning market oriented, the amount of resources holt by an organization, and external access to these resources are also presented, as well as clues for future research. This paper aims at contributing to the development of strategic management theory in relation to market changes even when not expected.

 

JEL: D20; D23; M11

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


organizational toughness, organizational plasticity, organizational strength, strategic management, pandemic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avey J B, Palanski M E, Walumbwa F O, 2011. When leadership goes unnoticed: The moderating role of follower self-esteem on the relationship between ethical leadership and follower behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 98: 573–582. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0610-2

Baker W E, Sinkula J M, 1999. Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: Integrating and extending models of organizational performance. Journal of Market Focused Management 4 (4): 295-308. doi:10.1177/0092070399274002

Barney J, 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (4): 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108

Baron J N, Hannan M T, Burton M D, 1999. Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations. American Sociology Review 64, 527–547. doi:10.2307/2657254

Basadur M, Gelade G, Basadur T, 2014. Creative problem-solving process styles, cognitive work demands, and organizational adaptability. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 50 (1): 80–115. doi:10.1177/0021886313508433

BBC.NEWS, 2019. Portugal strike: Tanker drivers defy threat of arrest (August 14, 2019). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-49344872. Accessed 14 April 2020

BBC.NEWS, 2020. France protests: Longest strike in decades stuck in deadlock (January 2, 2020). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50971439. Accessed 14 April 14 2020

Beltrán-Martín I, Roca-Puig V, Escrig-Tena A, Bou-Llusar J C, 2009. Internal labour flexibility from a resource-based view approach: definition and proposal of a measurement scale. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 20 (7): 1576–1598. doi:10.1080/09585190902985194

Bhattacharya M, Gibson D E, Doty D H, 2005. The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and human resource practices on firm performance. Journal of Management 31 (4): 622-640. doi:10.1177/0149206304272347

Breu K, Hemingway S J, Strathern M, Bridger D, 2002. Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. Journal of Information Technology 17 (1): 21–31. doi:10.1080/02683960110132070

Broekaert W, Andries P, Debackere K, 2016. Innovation processes in family firms: the relevance of organizational flexibility. Small Business Economy 47: 771–785. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9760-7.

Brown M E, Treviño L K, Harrison D A, 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97 (2): 117–134. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002

Camps J, Oltra V, Aldás-Manzano J, Buenaventuravera G, Torres-Carballo F, 2016. Individual performance in turbulent environments: The role of organizational learning and employee flexibility. Human Resource Management 55 (3): 363–383. doi:10.1002/hrm.21741

Carvalho J M S, 2005. Organizações não lucrativas – Aprendizagem organizacional, orientação de mercado, planeamento estratégico e desempenho. Edições Sílabo, Lisboa, Portugal.

Carvalho J M S, 2018. The ties of business. A humanistic perspective of entrepreneurship, innovation and sustainability. Lambert Academic Publishing.

Chatman J A, Caldwell D F, O’Reilly C A, Doerr B, 2014. Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35: 785-808. doi:10.1002/job.1928.

Cunha M P, Cunha R C, Rego A, Neves P, Cabral-Cardoso C, 2016. Manual de comportamento organizacional e gestão, 8th Ed. Editora RH, Lisboa, Portugal.

Cyert R M, March J G, 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, USA.

Dastmalchian A, 1993. The concept of organizational flexibility: exploring new direction. In Organizational Flexibility, Proceedings of a Colloquium. University of Victoria, British Columbia, pp 15-25.

Donaldson L, 2001. The contingency theory of organization. Sage Publications, London, UK.

Doz Y, Kosonen M, 2010. Embedding strategic agility. A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning 43: 370–382. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006

Eden D, Kinnar J, 1991. Modeling galatea: Boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering. Journal of Applied Psychology 76: 770–780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.770

Edwards M G, 2009. An integrative metatheory for organizational learning and sustainability in turbulent times. The Learning Organization 16 (3): 189–207. doi:10.1108/09696470910949926

Eldridge D, Nisar T M, 2006. The significance of employee skill in flexible work organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management 17 (5): 918-937. doi:10.1080/09585190600641164

Elengovan A R, Xie A J, 1999. Effects of perceived power of supervisor on the subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20 (3): 359–373. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199905)20:3%3C359::aid-job902%3E3.0.co;2-z

Friedman H H, Gerstein M, Hertz S, 2018. Employee adaptability and organizational agility: The secret elixir that produces outstanding performance. Northeast Business & Economics Association Proceedings, pp 105-109. https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ibzj3f3aq4rkve/2018%20NBEA%20Conference%20Proceedings%20-%20FINAL%20-%2003-13-19.pdf?dl=0

Fry L W, 2003. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 14 (6): 693–727. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001

Garlick D, 2002. Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: The role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. Psychology Review 109 (1): 116–136. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.116

Gavetti G, Rivkin J W, 2007. On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organization Science 18 (3): 420–439. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0282

Grant R M, 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33 (3): 114–135. doi:10.2307/41166664

Gunasekaran A, 1999. Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics 62: 87–105. doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00222-9

Hamel G, Prahalad C K, 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (May-June): 79–91.

Hill M E, Cromartie J, McGinnis J, 2017. Managing for variability: A neuroscientific approach for developing strategic agility in organizations. Creative Innovation Management 26: 221–232. doi:10.1111/caim.12223

Hitt M A, Keats B W, DeMarie S M, 1998. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive 12 (4): 22-42. doi:10.5465/ame.1998.1333922

Holbeche L, 2019. Designing sustainably agile and resilient organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 36: 668–677. doi:10.1002/sres.2624

Hopp W J, Van Oyen M P, 2004. Agile workforce evaluation: a framework for cross-training and coordination. IIE Transactions 36 (10): 919–940. doi:10.1080/07408170490487759

Itami H, Roehl T, 1987. Mobilizing invisible assets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.

Ivory S B, Brooks S B, 2018. Managing corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens: Lessons from strategic agility. Journal of Business Ethics 148: 347–361. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3583-6

Jackson S E, Schuler R S, 1995. Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environment. Annual Review of Psychology 46: 237–264. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001321

Keister A C, 2014. Thriving teams and change agility: leveraging a collective state to create organization agility. In Research in Organizational Change and Development. Emerald, Bingley, UK, pp 299-333. doi:10.1108/s0897-3016_2014_0000022007

Kelley D, 2009. Adaptation and organizational connectedness in corporate radical innovation programs. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (5): 487–501. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00676.x.

Ketkar S, Sett P K, 2010. Environmental dynamism, human resource flexibility, and firm performance: Analysis of a multi-level causal model. International Journal of Human Resource Management 21: 1173–1206. doi:10.1080/09585192.2010.483841

Kodama M, 2019. Business innovation through holistic leadership-developing organizational adaptability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 36: 365–394. doi:10.1002/sres.2551

Kohli A K, Jaworski B J, 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1-18. doi:10.2307/1251866

Kreye M E, 2016. Employee motivation in product service system providers. Production Planning & Control 27: 1249-1259. doi:10.1080/09537287.2016.1206219

Levinthal D, Marino A 2015. Three facets of organizational adaptation: Selection, variety, and plasticity. Organization Science 26 (3): 743-755. doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0956

Lewis M W, Andriopoulos C, Smith W K, 2014. Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review 56 (3): 58–77. doi:10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.58

Lewis P, 2016. Is knowledge doubling or halving. http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/is-knowledge-doubling-or-halving/ Accessed 3 April 2020

Locke E A, Schattke K, 2019. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Time for expansion and clarification. Motivation Science 5 (4): 277–290. doi:10.1037/mot0000116

MacDuffie J P, 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world of auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48: 197-221. doi:10.2307/2524483

McClelland D C, 1973. Testing for competence rather than intelligence. American Psychologist 28 (1): 1-14. doi:10.1037/h0034092

Miles R E, Snow C C, Fjeldstad Ø D, Miles G, Lettl C, 2010. Designing organizations to meet 21st-century opportunities and challenges. Organizational Dynamics 39 (2): 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.009.

Ngo H-Y, Loi R, 2008. Human resource flexibility, organizational culture and firm performance: an investigation of multinational firms in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19 (9): 1654–1666. doi:10.1080/09585190802295082

Nonaka I, Takeuchi H, 1995. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

O’Reilly C III, Tushman M, 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 82 (April): 74–82.

Penrose E, 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press, Oxforf, UK.

Pierce J L, Gardner D G, Dunham R B, Cummings L L, 1993. Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition employee response relationships. Academy of Management Journal 36: 271-288. doi:10.5465/256523

Plonka F S, 1997. Developing a lean and agile work force. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 7 (1): 11–20.

doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6564(199724)7:1%3C11::aid-hfm2%3E3.0.co;2-j

Pulakos E D, Arad S, Donovan M A, Plamondon K E, 2000. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 612-624. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612

Reed K, Blunsdon B, 1998. Organizational flexibility in Australia. International Journal of Human Resource Management 9 (3): 457–477. doi:10.1080/095851998341017

Roos D, 2014. 10 companies that completely reinvented themselves. http://money.howstuffworks.com/10-companies-reinvented-themselves.htm Accessed 2 April 2020

Saks A M, Ashforth B E, 2000. The role of dispositions, entry stressors, and behavioral plasticity theory in predicting newcomers’ adjustment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 21: 43–62. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(200002)21:1%3C43::aid-job985%3E3.0.co;2-w

Schein E, 2017. Organizational culture and leadership, 5th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.

Schonberger R J, 1982. Japanese manufacturing techniques: Nine hidden lessons in simplicity. Free Press, USA.

Senge P M, 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New York, USA.

Sheppard J, 1995. A resource dependence approach to organizational failure. Social Science Research 24: 28–62. doi:10.1006/ssre.1995.1002

Sherehyi B, Karwowski W, Layer J K, 2007. A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37: 445–460. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007

Sherer M, Maddux J E, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers R N, 1982. The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports 51: 663-671. doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663

Teece D, Pisano G, 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3 (3): 537–556. doi:10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a

The New York Times, (2020). The U.S. shut down its economy. Here’s what needs to happen in order to restart (22nd March). https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/22/us/politics/coronavirus-economy-shutdown.html Accessed 3 April 2020

Uhl-Bien M, Arena M, 2018. Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly 29 (1): 89–104. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009

Wernerfelt B, 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207

Wright P M, Dunford B B, Snell S A, 2001. Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management 27: 701–721. doi:10.1177/014920630102700607

Wright P M, Snell S A, 1998. Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review 23: 756-772. doi:10.2307/259061




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v5i3.873

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 João Manuel da Silva Carvalho

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.