Charles Daniel Enyia, Christine Adaobi Nwuche


In a world full of uncertainties, firms that would survive would have no choice than to be innovative in order to satisfy consumer needs and meet economic goals. This paper examines the role of innovation in bringing about effective engagement and economic growth in challenging times. 83 respondents were drawn from eight sectors of the economy using google-form (an online survey builder) with the aid of email and WhatsApp in distributing the research instrument. Both discriminant and convergent validity were carried out on the statement items and values above 0.7 were derived. Our composite reliability test also had values above 0.7 for each of the constructs. The hypotheses were tested using Pearson moment correlation and for each of the tests, a positive Pearson coefficient and p-value less than 0.05 were achieved. The study concludes that innovation has a significant relationship with both effective engagement and economic growth. The study further recommends conscious effort of both government and stakeholders towards encouraging innovation in all sectors of the economy such as health, education, finance, etc.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


leadership styles, job performance, productivity, rank and file employees

Full Text:



Aghion, P., Harmgart, H., Weisshaar, N. (2010). Fostering growth in CEE countries: a country-tailored approach to growth policy, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Working Paper, no. 118/2010, , 1-29.

Agri, E. M., Mailafia, D. & Umejiaku, R., I. (2017). Impact of Economic Recession on Macroeconomic Stability and Sustainable Development in Nigeria. Science Journal of Economics 3(4) , 2276-6286.

APS. (2020). Maintaining employee engagement during COVID-19. Australian psychological Society http/

Bersin, J. (2014). Why companies fail to engage today’s workforce: The overwhelmed employee. . Retrieved from

Bjørnland, H. C. (2000). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand, supply and oil price shocks-a comparative study. The Manchester School, 68(5), 578-607.

Boushey G. (2016). Targeted for diffusion?How the use and acceptance ofstereotypes shape the diffusion of criminal justice policy innovations in the American states. American Political Science Review 110(1), 198–214 .

Brookings, E. (2020). Understanding the impact of the covid 19 outbreak on the Nigerian economy. Retrieved from

Carneiro, A., Portugal, P., & Varejão, J. (2014). Catastrophic job destruction during the Portuguese economic crisis. Journal of Macroeconomics 39(2), 444-457.

CBN. (2016). Statistical Bulletin. Retrieved from

Chauffour, J. P., & Farole, T. (2009). Trade finance in crisis: market adjustment or market failure?. The World Bank.

Conell C., Cohn S. (1995). Learning from other people’s actions: environmental variation and diffusion in French coal mining strikes, 1890–1935. . American Journal of Sociology 101(2), 366–403 .

Costello, T. & Prohaska, B. (2013). Innovation. IT professional, 15(3) , 62-64.

Dearing J. W., Kreuter M. W. (2010). Designing for diffusion: how can we increase uptake of cancer communication innovations? . Patient Education Counselling 81(3), 100–110.

Fine, S. (2010). Is good character good enough? The effects of situational variables on the relationship between integrity and counterproductive work behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 73–84.

Guner, N., Ventura, G.& Yi, X. (2008). Macroeconomic implications of size-dependent policies. Revised Economic Dynamics 11 (4), 721–744.

Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2012). Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of Management, 40(2), 1899–1931. doi:10.1177/0149206312445925.

IMF. (2020). World economic outlook. Washinton D.C: International Monetary Fund.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

Karch A. (2007). Democratic laboratories: policy diffusion among the American states. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press.

Karch A. (2010). Vertical diffusion and the policy-making process: the politics of embryonic stem cell research. Political Research Quarterly 65(1), 48–61.

Kortmann, S., Gelhard, C., Zimmermann, C., & Piller, F. (2014). Linking strategic flexibility and operational efficiency: The mediating role of ambidextrous operational capabilities. . Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 475–490. doi:10.1016/j.jom.201.09.

Leviton L. C. (2017). Generalizing about public health interventions: a mixed-methods approach to external validity . Annual Revised Public Health 38(1), 371–391.

May P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy 12(4), 331–354.

NBS (2017). Statistical Yearbook,. Abuja: National Bureau of Statistics .

NCC (2018). Industry statistics. Retrieved from

OECD (2007). Innovations and growth: Rational for an innovation strategy. 3-29.

Pacheco J & Boushey G. (2014). Public health and agenda setting: determinants of state attention to tobacco and vaccines. Journal of Health Polit Policy Law 39(3), 565–589.

Rogers E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York (NY): FreePress.

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

Schumpter, J. A. (1912). The theory of economic development. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Shaw, K. (2005). Employee Engagement: How to Build a High-performance Workforce. Chicago, IL: MelcrumPublishing Limited.

Shipan C. R. & Volden C. (2006). Bottom-upfederalism: the diffusion of anti-smoking policies from U.S. cities tostates. Ameriacan Journal of Political Science. 50(4), 825–43.

Shirom, A. (2003). Job-related burnout: A review. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Slåtten, T. & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline employees: A study from the hospitality industry . Managing Service Quality, 21(1), 88–107.

Slåtten, T. & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). What are the drivers for innovative behavior in frontline jobs? A study of the hospitality industry in Norway. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 10(3),, 254–272.

Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.

Tienken, C. H. (2013). International Comparisons of Innovation and Creativity. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(4), 153-155.

West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Yuan, F. & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Charles Daniel Enyia, Christine Adaobi Nwuche

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.