MEDIA SYSTEM AND RE-EVALUATION OF HISTORY IN GLASNOST-PERIOD GEORGIAN MEDIA 1989-90

Khatuna Maisashvili

Abstract


The aim of the article is to examine and analyze the specific Georgian peculiarities of the Glasnost policy in 1989-90, based on the relational content analysis of 158 media stories from four Georgian newspapers with different editorial policies. The term Georgian peculiarities refer to (1) media system specifics and (2) characteristic features of re-evaluation of Soviet History as a crucial part of Glasnost narrative. Studying the specific characteristics of Georgia’s mainstream media at that time is interesting in that it allows for (1) critical analysis of Hallin and Mancini’s theoretical approach and ways to enrich it through the study of media transformation from still authoritarian in form but, in essence, under a mixed type of political system (this process may be referred to as political uncertainty), and (2) accentuation of the media’s active role in shaping political and cultural memory. As for history’s reevaluation in Glasnost’s content, it still remains the main, dominant issue ultimately unrivaled (in terms of time and intensity) by any other issue proclaimed by Glasnost—be it food shortage exposed by the media or criticism of one-party rule. The issue of history’s reevaluation in the Soviet republics, in the so-called national periphery, acquired an even more critical meaning because the change brought about Perestroika there, along with the new political and social elites, placed history as the cornerstone of a future independent state, or metaphorically speaking, turned yesterday into today and further into tomorrow. This process proved to be so far-reaching that so-called inert Glasnost maintained its position even in the post-Soviet media for some time and with certain intensity. The main findings of the article are: 1) Identifying the unified and segmented paradigms of Glasnost in Georgia’s politics and media; 2) Defining the political attitudes of the Georgian political elites toward Glasnost, and 3) Distinguishing the concept of reinterpretation of history (in the Center, Moscow) from the concept of revisionism of history (National Peripheries of the USSR).

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


glasnost, media, history, reinterpretation/revisionism, Georgia, elite

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wang, A. (2006). Advertising engagement: A driver of message involvement on message effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 46, 355-368. doi: 10.2501/S0021849906060429

Napoli, P. (2011). Audience revolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. NY: Columbia University Press.

Andronikashvili, Z. & Maisuradze, G. (2007). Georgia 1990: Philologema of Independence. Journal NLO – Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 1.

Balcytiene, A (2012). Culture as a Guide in Theoretical Explorations of Baltic Media, in Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World. Daniel C. Hallin, Paolo Mancini (eds). Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, S. F. (1985) Rethinking the Soviet Experience: Politics and History since 1917. Oxford University Press.

Epstein, M. (1991). After the future: on the new consciousness in literature, Perestroika: perspectives on modernization, in South Atlantic Quarterly, spring 1991, vol. 90, no. 2.

Gibbs, Joseph. (1999). Gorbachev's Glasnost/The Soviet Media in the First Phase of Perestroika. Texas University Press.

Gogoladze M. & Toklikishvili, L. (2008). The media allocated for war (in Georgian). Magazine Sitkva, vol.2, 67-75, Tbilisi.

Hallin, D.C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Holmes, L. (2013). Perestroika: A Reassessment. London, UK: Routledge.

Kouki. H.(2004) The Politics of History and the History of Politics: the Rewriting of the Past During Perestroika (1985-1990), Journal Historein Volume 4 (2003-4), 131.

Maisashvili, K. (2017). The Georgian media of 90s as A Central Site of Interreplacemnt of Official and Unofficial Histories. The Georgian Case of Glasnost (in Georgian). Tbilisi University Press.

Maisashvili, K (2010). The Representation of National Identity in Georgian Print Press. 1990-1991 (in Georgian). Ilia University Press. 2010. http://opac.iliauni.edu.ge/eg/opac/record/9938

McNair, B. (1991). Glasnost, Perestroika and Soviet Media, London and New York: Routledge

Murray, J. (1991). Glasnost 1990. Irish Communication Review: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://arrow.dit.ie/icr/vol1/iss1/3

Natadze, N. (2002). What I Know (Facts and Analysis). Tbilisi.

Oates, S. (2014). Demokratizatsiya; Washington 22.2 277-293, Spring 2014.

Oates, S. (2006). Television, Democracy ans Election in Russia. London: Routledge.

Ovsepyan, R. (1979). Sovetskaya zhurnalistika i Kommunisticheskoe Vispitanie Trudyashchikhsya (Soviet Journalism and Communist Upbringing of Workers). Moscow: Moskva.

Shamilishvili, M. & Tsereteli, M. (2016). The Principle Strategies of Georgian Pluralist Media in 1916-1921 (in Georgian). Tbilisi University Press.

Shatirishvili, Z. (2010). The National Identity and National Narratives (in Georgian). http://social-democrats-georgia.blogspot.com/2010/06/blog-post_27.html

Tarasulo, I.J. (1989). Gorbachev and Glasnost. Viewpoints from the Soviet Press.

Vartanova, E. (2012). The Russian media Model in the Context of Post-Soviet Dynamics, in Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Daniel C. Hallin, Paolo Mancini (eds). Cambridge University Press.

Young, M.J. & Launer, M.K. (1991). Redefining Glasnost in the Soviet Media: The Recontextualization of Chemobyl, Journal of Communication 41(2), Spring. 0021- 9916/91/b0.0+.05


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Khatuna Maisashvili

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2018. European Journal Of Political Science Studies (ISSN 2601-2766) is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


 

Hit counter