THE MACHINERY FOR CHANGE: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROOTS OF LIBERAL-REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY - A CRITICAL APPROACH TOWARDS FORCED DEMOCRATIZATIONS, AND AN OUTLOOK ON THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF THE LIBERAL ORDER

Jan-Boje Frauen

Abstract


In the present article I display the ideological foundations of the current system of representative democracy and question the liberal core beliefs that it is per definitionem superior to other political systems and that material causation will lead to a world of liberal democracies (or to a liberal democratic world state) because of this. The argument is developed in three steps. First, the creative power of ideas and ideologies is displayed. Secondly, an analysis of the historical growth of the liberal democracy regime is employed. Lastly, internal contradictions and problems are extracted from the structure displayed. The paper ultimately derives three conclusions. First, the foundations of the liberal-democratic system are ideological and thus relative. There have been alternative forms of public participation in political decision-making processes. Secondly, the system is bound by its ideological roots to turn imperialist but will fail in contexts that do not share its historical development. Thirdly, the nearer future will see an increasing tension between the old elites of the system and forces for change driven by advances in ICT. Instead of the liberal world state, the liberal order might thus evolve internally into a new mode of knowledge production and rule administration based on mass participation rather than on the election of representatives.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


democracy, liberal order, political ideology, political theory, democracy discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European journal of international relations, 3(3), 319–363.

Almond, G. A., & Genco, S. J. (1977). Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics, 29(4), 489–522. doi:10.2307/2010037

Al-Rodhan, N. (2013). The Future of International Relations: A Symbiotic Realism Theory.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2017). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beyme, K. von. (1996). The concept of political class: A new dimension of research on elites? West European Politics, 19(1), 68–87.

Binder, A. J., Davis, D. B., & Bloom, N. (2016). Career funneling: How elite students learn to define and desire ‘‘prestigious’ ’jobs. Sociology of Education, 89(1), 20–39.

Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital.(1986). Cultural theory: An anthology, 1, 81–93.

Bourne, J. (2001). The life and times of institutional racism. Race & class, 43(2), 7–22.

Boyer, P. S., Clark, C. E., Halttunen, K., Kett, J. F., & Salisbury, N. (2013). The enduring vision: A history of the American people: Cengage Learning.

Bueger, C., & Gadinger, F. (2018). International practice theory: Springer.

Christodoulou, N. (2010). Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies. In Thousand Oaks, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/curriculumstudies

Douglass, F. (2000). Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass, an American slave: Random House Digital, Inc.

Dunleavy, P., & O'leary, B. (1987). Theories of the state: The politics of liberal democracy: Macmillan.

Fierke, K. M., & Jorgensen, K. E. (2015). Constructing International Relations: the next generation: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1975, ©1973). Birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception / Michel Foucault ; translated from the French by A.M. Sheridan Smith.

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The national interest, (16), 3–18.

Gladney, H. M. (2014). No Taxation Without Representation: Xlibris Corporation.

Gormezano, I., Prokasy, W. F., & Thompson, R. F. (2014). Classical conditioning.

Granfield, R. (1991). Making it by faking it: Working-class students in an elite academic environment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20(3), 331–351.

Guzzini, S. (2000). A reconstruction of constructivism in international relations. European journal of international relations, 6(2), 147–182.

Halbwachs, M. (2006). On collective memory. (Coser, L. A., Ed.). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Hilz, W. (2007). Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York 1948. In Schlüsselwerke der Politikwissenschaft (pp. 310–314). Springer.

Hinshelwood, B. (2013). The Carolinian Context of John Locke's Theory of Slavery. Political Theory, 41(4), 562–590. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23484595

Hobbes, T., Tuck, R., Geuss, R., & Skinner, Q. (1996). Hobbes: "Leviathan" (Rev. ed.). Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horsley, R. A. (1993). Jesus and the spiral of violence: Popular Jewish resistance in Roman Palestine: Fortress Press.

Hülsse, R., & Spencer, A. (2008). The metaphor of terror: Terrorism studies and the constructivist turn. Security Dialogue, 39(6), 571–592.

Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign affairs, 22–49.

Jahn, B. (1999). IR and the state of nature: the cultural origins of a ruling ideology. Review of international Studies, 25(3), 411–434.

Jefferson, T. (2002). The declaration of independence: Scholastic Inc.

Jefferson, T. (2007). Notes on the state of Virginia. By Thomas Jefferson. Retrieved from http://name.umdl.umich.edu/N20681.0001.001

Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (1998). International organization and the study of world politics. International organization, 52(4), 645–685.

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (2014). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics: Cornell University Press.

King, & Rev. Martin Luther Jr. (1963). "I Have A Dream…" speech Copyright 1963, Martin Luther King, Jr. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/files/press/exhibits/dream-speech.pdf

Klotz, A., & Lynch, C. M. (2014). Strategies for research in constructivist international relations: Routledge.

Korab-Karpowicz, W. J. (2010). Political realism in international relations.

Kubálková, V. (2015). International relations in a constructed world: Routledge.

Levine, R. S., Elliott, M. A., Gustafson, S. M., Hungerford, A., & Loeffelholz, M. (2017). The Norton anthology of American literature (Shorter ninth edition).

Locke, J. (1796). An essay concerning human understanding (20th ed.). London: Printed for T. Longman.

Locke, J., & Laslett, P. (1988). Locke: Two treatises of government student edition. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lynch, M. (2006). Al-Qaeda’s constructivist turn. Praeger Security International, 5, 2006.

Machiavelli, N. (1992). The Prince. New York: Dover.

Nietzsche, F. (2006). Jenseits von Gut und Böse ; Und Zur Genealogie der Moral: Anaconda.

Orwell, G. (2008). Nineteen eighty-four. London: Viking.

Paul, T. V., Wirtz, J. J., & Fortmann, M. (2004). Balance of power: theory and practice in the 21st century: Stanford University Press.

Philpott, D. (2010). Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rourke, J. T. (2003). International politics on the world stage: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill.

Snyder, J. (2004). One World, Rival Theories. Foreign policy, (145), 52–62.

Tang, W., & Darr, B. (2012). Chinese nationalism and its political and social origins. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(77), 811–826.

Tuckness, A. (2005). Locke’s political philosophy.

Vukovich, D. F. (2012). China and orientalism: Western knowledge production and the P. R. C. Postcolonial politics: Vol. 5. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://reference-tree.com/book/china-and-orientalism-western-knowledge-production-and-the-prc?utm_source=gbv&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=collaboration

Walt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca. NY: Cornell University,

Walt, S. M. (1998). International relations: one world, many theories. Foreign policy, 29–46.

Waltz, K. N. (2010). Theory of international politics: Waveland Press.

Welchman, J. (1995). Locke on slavery and inalienable rights. Canadian journal of philosophy, 25(1), 67–81.

Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46(2), 391–425.

Wendt, A. (2003). Why a world state is inevitable. European journal of international relations, 9(4), 491–542.

Wiebrecht, F. (2013). Democratic Peace Theory.

Williams, M. C. (2004). Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics. International organization, 58(4), 633–665. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877799

Wills, G. (2018). Inventing America: Jefferson's declaration of independence: Vintage.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jan-Boje Frauen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2018. European Journal Of Political Science Studies (ISSN 2601-2766) is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


 

Hit counter