PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS’ METAPHORICAL CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF AN EFL TEACHER

Tuba Karagöz, Murat Şükür, Sevil Filiz

Abstract


This study aimed to examine pre-service Turkish EFL teachers’ conceptualizations of an EFL teacher through metaphors. To this end, a total of 59 senior pre-service EFL teachers, who are majoring in ELT at Gazi University, a state university in Ankara took part in this study. Of these participants who are aged between 20 and 24, 53 were female and 6 were male. The data for the study were collected via a metaphor elicitation task in which the participants were asked to fill in the prompt “An English teacher is like…………. because………..” in Turkish. Before eliciting the metaphors of pre-service teachers, a 15- minute workshop was held to explain what metaphor is and how it is utilized to reflect individuals’ thoughts and actions in daily life. Qualitative research method was used in the present study and content analysis was carried out to analyze the data accordingly. The results of the study showed that senior pre-service EFL teachers conceptualize an EFL teacher mostly through roles that are not peculiar to an EFL teacher, but a teacher in general. Furthermore, the results suggest that senior pre-service teachers tend to adopt traditional teacher roles like provider of knowledge in their conceptualizations of an EFL teacher.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


metaphors, teacher roles, teacher characteristics, an EFL teacher, pre-service teacher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th edition). Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Asmalı, M., & Çelik, H. (2017). EFL teachers' conceptualizations of their roles through metaphor analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 1-13.

Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.

Cephe, P. T. (2009). An analysis of the impact of reflective teaching on the beliefs of teacher trainees. Egitim ve Bilim, 34(152), 182-191.

de Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Exploring ESL teachers' roles through metaphor analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 341-351.

Farrell, T. S. (2006). ‘The Teacher Is an Octopus’ Uncovering Preservice English Language Teachers’ Prior Beliefs through Metaphor Analysis. RELC Journal, 37(2), 236-248.

Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013-1055.

Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Hamilton, E. R. (2016). Picture This: Multimodal representations of prospective teachers' metaphors about teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 33-44.

Inbar, D. E. (1996). The free educational prison: Metaphors and images. Educational Research, 38(1), 77-92.

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M., (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Publisher.

Martı́nez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 965-977.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2008). Measuring metaphors: A factor analysis of students’ conceptions of language teachers. Metaphorik. de, 15(161-180).

Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R. Z., Saleh, A., & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3-50.

Özmen, K. S. (2012). Exploring student teachers’ beliefs about language learning and teaching: A longitudinal study. Current Issues in Education, 15(1). 24-34.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Third edition). California: Sage Publications.

Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.

Saban, A. (2004). Prospective classroom teachers’ metaphorical images of selves and comparing them to those they have of their elementary and cooperating teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 617-635.

Saban, A. (2006). Functions of metaphor in teaching and teacher education: A review essay. Teaching Education, 17(4), 299-315.

Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). An investigation of the concept of teacher among prospective teachers through metaphor analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2). 509-522.

Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 123-139.

Seferoğlu, G., Korkmazgil, S., & Ölçü, Z. (2009). Gaining insights into teachers' ways of thinking via metaphors. Educational Studies, 35(3), 323-335.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wan, W., Low, G. D., & Li, M. (2011). From students’ and teachers’ perspectives: Metaphor analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers’ roles. System, 39(3), 403-415.

Zapata, G. C., & Lacorte, M. (2007). Preservice and inservice instructors' metaphorical constructions of second language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 521-534.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.1447

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).