ASSESSING READABILITY OF A NATIONAL EXAM READING TEXTS IN MALAYSIA

Nurul Farehah Mohamad Uri, Mohd Salehhuddin Abd Aziz

Abstract


This paper intends to investigate the readability level of the passages in the English paper of a national examination in Malaysia. In specific, this study seeks to identify the level of readability for reading passages of SPM English papers using readability formulas and judgement of reading experts. The readability of the English papers was analyzed using three readability formulas: Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index and Coh-Metrix L2 Reading Index. Five reading experts were also invited to evaluate the difficulty level of the reading texts. The readability scores of these reading texts revealed that these texts were graded as “fairly easy” texts as they fell within the range of 66.7-80.6 for Flesch Reading Ease, 6.9-10.1 for Gunning Fog Index. Results of Coh-Metrix L2 Reading Index also prove the readability level of the passages. Correspondingly, the content experts noted that the reading texts were interesting and generally easy to read texts. The analyses of the reading passages have shown that the texts chosen for the English papers were reasonably appropriate for the upper secondary school students.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


readability; reading texts; Flesch Reading Ease; Gunning Fog Index; Coh- Metrix L2 Reading Index, high stake test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Halim Ibrahim & Mariam Mohamed Nor. (2011). Knowledge of Linguistics Cues among Malay EFL Students and Teachers’ Practice in the Teaching of Reading Skills. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 7(2), 1- 43. Retrieved from http://pustaka2.upsi.edu.my/eprints/773/1/KNOWLEDGE%20OF%20LINGUISTI C%20CUES%20AMONG%20MALAY%20EFL%20STUDENTS%20AND%20TEA CHERS%20PRACTICES%20IN%20THE%20TEACHING%20OF%20READING% 20SKILLS.pdf

Abdul Kadir Mohd Nor. (1997). Understandability of Chairman’s Address in Annual Reports: A Malaysian Context. (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://eprints.uitm.edu.my/2527/1/ABDUL_KADIR_MOHD_NOOR_97.pdf

Akbari. R., Atae. M.R. & Marefat.H. (1999). The Role of Discourse Elements in Determining the Readability of Texts. TESL Reporter, 32(1), 16 - 27. Retrieved from https://ojs.lib.byu.edu/spc/index.php/TESL/article/viewFile/3647/3421

Chall, J.S. (1996). Varying approaches to readability measurement. Linguistic Magazine. 25(1), 23 - 40.Doi: 10.7202/ 603125ar

Crossley, S.A., Allen, D., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Text simplification and comprehensible input: A case for an intuitive approach. Language Teaching Research Journal, 16(1), 1-12. Doi: 10.1177/ 1362168811423456

Dale, E. and Chall, J. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26(1), 19 - 26. London, UK: Pearson.

Dahlia Janan, Wray. D. & Pope. M. (2010). Paradigm in readability research. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(17), 19 - 29. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=4B30BAEDE57C14766E A205EEF112F2C0?doi=10.1.1.301.6485&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Dahlia Janan & Wray, D. (2012). Readability: The limitations of an approach through formulae. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association conference, Manchester, UK. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/213296.pdf

Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G., & Pearson, P.D. (1991). Moving from the old to new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research Journal, 61(2), 239 - 264. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170536

Elley, W. (1969). The assessment of readability by noun frequency counts. Reading Research Quarterly, 4(3), 411 - 427.

Flesch, R. (1949). New Facts about Readability. College English Journal, 10(4), 225 - 226.

Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus Leveling: Both of These Procedures Can Help Teachers Select Books for Readers at Different Stages. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 286 - 292. Retrieved from https://fall2013engl300.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/edward-fry-readability-vs- leveling.pdf

Gray, W.S. & Leary, B.E. (1935). What Makes a Book Readable. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Gunning, R. (1952). The technique of clear writing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Hiebert, E.H. (2012). The Common Core Standard and Text Complexity, 1 - 8. Retrieved from http://textproject.org/assets/library/papers/Hiebert-2011-Text- Complexity-Lexiles.pdf

Imran Ho-Abdullah & Ruzy Suliza Hashim. (2007). Readability analysis of Malaysian short stories in English. Jurnal e-Bangi, 2 (2), 1 - 11. Retrieved from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1527/1/imran07.pdf

Khang, N.D. (2010). Teachers’ Perceptions about Readability and Modification of Authentic Texts Chosen for Teaching Reading in the Vietnamese Context. Journal of NELTA, 15 (1), 89 - 97. Retrieved from http://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NELTA/article/download/4613/3824

Klare, G.R. (1969). The measurement of readability. Iowa, IA: Iowa State University Press

Kintsch, W. and Vipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In Nilsson. L (Ed.), Perspectives on Memory Research (329 - 365). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lin. L & Min. L. (2011, November). Book Leveling for Chinese Extensive Reading in Primary Schools in Singapore. First Extensive Reading World Congress Proceedings (pp.138-140). Kyoto, Japan: Extensive Reading Foundation. Retrieved from http://erfoundation.org/proceedings/erwc1-Lin-Li.pdf

Lorge. I. (1944). Predicting reading difficulty of selections for children: Elementary English. London, UK: Pearson.

Meyer, R.E. (1985). How to analyze science prose. In B. Britton & J. Black (Ed.) Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyzing Explanatory Text (pp. 305-313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

McLaughin, G. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of reading, 12(8), 639 - 646.

Ojemann, R. (1934). The reading ability of parents and factors associated with the reading difficulty of parent education materials: Researches in Parent Education 2. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 8, 11 - 32.

Rosli Mohamad & Azhar Abdul Rahman. (2006). Readability of Corporate Annual Reports of Top 100 Malaysian Companies. Malaysian Management Journal, 10(2), 33 – 47. Retrieved from http://repo.uum.edu.my/2920/1/mmj10123[1].pdf

Spache.G. (1953). "A New Readability Formula for Primary-Grade Reading Materials". The Elementary School Journal, 53(7), 410 – 413.

Ulusoy. M. (2006). Readability Approaches: Implications for Turkey. International Education Journal, 7(3), 323 - 332. Retrieved from http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/v7n3/Ulusoy/paper.pdf

Vogel, M. and Washburne, C. (1928). An objective method of determining grade placement of children’s reading material. The Elementary School Journal, 28(5), 373 - 381.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).