KNOWLEDGE TRANSFORMING IN WRITING: AN ANALYSIS OF READ-TO-WRITE PROCESS

Noor Hanim Rahmat

Abstract


Academic writing depends on critical reading. Writers need to read materials to be used as support and evidence in their writing. The writing process of an academic writer mirrors the knowledge transforming model. The link between reading and writing has been established by past studies. The read-to-write process is the academic writing process that writers go through but focused more on the reading activities to prepare for materials to be included in the essay. This study is done to explore the perception of writers in their reading stage (read-to-write process). 176 undergraduates taking academic writing course were randomly chosen to respond to the instrument. The instrument is a 5 Likert-scale with 34 items on topics pertaining to variables found in the knowledge transforming model. Findings reveal that writers take alternative roles and reader and writer in the writing process. Findings also reveal interesting pedagogical implications in the teaching and learning of both academic reading and writing.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


academic writing, writers, readers, knowledge transforming, read-to-write

Full Text:

PDF

References


An, S. (2013). Schema Theory in Reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol 3(1), pp 130-134. Retrieved from http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol03/01/19.pdf.

Atayeva, M., Kassymova, G., Setyo, P. N. H., & Kosbay, S. (2019). Impact of Reading on Students’ Writing Ability. Materials of International Practical Internet Conference “Challenges of Science”, Issue II, November 2019. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fcreativecommons.org%2Flicenses%2Fby-nc-nd%2F3.0%2F.

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

Delaney, Y. A. (2008). Investigating the Reading-to-Write Construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Vol 7(1), pp140-150. Retrieved from http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/yya2/reading2writearticle.pdf.

Gauthier, L. R. (1982). A Study of the Three-Level Hierarchy of Information Processing in Reading Comprehension with Respect to Cognitive Demand. Louisiana State University Historical Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4755&context=gradschool_disstheses.

Knott, D. (2020). Critical Reading towards Critical Writing. University of Toronto Retrieved from https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/researching/critical-reading/.

Matarese, V. (2013). Using Strategic, critical reading of research papers to teach scientific writing: The Reading-research-writing continuum. Supporting Research Writing. Roles and Challenges in Multilingual Settings. Chandos Information Professional Services. Pp 73—89. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781843346661500059.

Na, C. D., and Mai, N. X. N. C. (2017). Paraphrasing in Academic Writing: A Case Study of Vietnamese learners of English. Language Education in Asia, Vol 8(1),pp9-24. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/17/V8/I1/A02/Na_Mai.

Rahmat, N. H., Aripin, N., Lin, N. M., Whanchit, W. and Khairuddin, Z. (2020). Exploring the Connection between Critical Thinking Skills and Academic Writing. International Journal of Asian Social Science, Vol 10(2), pp 118-128. Retrieved from http://www.aessweb.com/journals/5007/February2020?ic=download&id=4874.

Rahmat, N. H. (2011). Approaches in the Teaching of ESL Writing. Selangor Malaysia: UiTM Press.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp . 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Spivey, N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing and the making of meaning. San Diego: Academic Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v5i4.3103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).