Nga H. T. Nguyen, Tu K. Kim


No one denied the important role of reading comprehension in learning reading because reading becomes meaningless without comprehending the texts. So, the research “Difficulties in reading comprehension of English majored sophomores at Tay Do University, Cantho, Vietnam” was conducted to help sophomores recognize their problems in reading. The participants of the study comprise 90 English majored sophomores from Bachelor of English 10 (2015-2019) at Tay Do University. All of them still have some difficulties in linguistic causes as vocabulary, grammar structures, background knowledge and in some strategies, such as guessing meaning from the context, skimming, scanning and also in psychological causes as attitude and motivation. The research was divided into 2 stages. The former was delivering questionnaire to participants. Then, students were chosen to do interview paper. The paper also finds out some obstacles to help students to get over their difficulties.

Không ai phủ nhận vai trò quan trọng của đọc hiểu đối với học môn đọc hiểu vì việc đọc sẽ trở nên vô nghĩa nếu không hiểu nội dung. Vì vậy, nghiên cứu “Khó khăn khi học môn đọc hiểu của sinh viên năm thứ hai chuyên ngành Ngôn Ngữ Anh tại Trường Đại học Tây Đô, Thành phố Cần Thơ, Việt Nam” được thực hiện nhằm giúp sinh viên năm hai nhận ra vấn đề của họ khi học môn đọc hiểu. Đối tượng nghiên cứu bao gồm 90 sinh viên năm thứ hai Cử nhân tiếng Anh khóa 10 (năm học 2015-2019) tại Trường Đại học Tây Đô. Tất cả sinh viên gặp một số khó khăn về ngôn ngữ như từ vựng, cấu trúc ngữ pháp, kiến thức cơ bản và một số chiến lược đọc hiểu như đoán nghĩa từ theo ngữ cảnh, đọc lướt, đọc lấy ý chi tiết và cả nguyên nhân tâm lý như thái độ và động lực học tập. Nghiên cứu được chia thành 2 giai đoạn. Đầu tiên là gửi bảng câu hỏi cho những người tham gia. Sau đó, chọn người tham gia trả lời phỏng vấn trên giấy. Bài nghiên cứu cũng tìm ra một số trở ngại để giúp sinh viên vượt qua khó khăn khi học môn đọc hiểu.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


reading comprehension, difficulties, English majored sophomore, university / đọc hiểu, khó khăn, sinh viên năm hai chuyên Anh ngữ, đại học

Full Text:



Richard C. Anderson Anderson, Elfrieda Hiebert, Judith Scott & Ian A. G. Wilkinson (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. National Institute of Education.

Marva A. Barnett (1989). More meets the eye: foreign language learner reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Brown, J. D (2001). Using surveys in Language program. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Butler-Pascoe, M. E. (2009). English for specific purposes: innovation, and technology. English Education and ESP. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Byrness, H. (1984). The role of listening comprehension: A theoretical base. London: Equinox.

Carrell, P. L. (1984). Evidence of a formal schema in second language comprehension. Language learning.

Christine Nuttall (1982). Teaching reading skills in foreign language, Oxford: Heiemann Educational books.

Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Day, R. R. & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Eiko Ushida (1994). The Role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning. San Diego: University of California.

Gray, W., & Holmes, F. (1938). The development of meaning vocabularies in reading. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago publications of lab schools.

Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in second language acquisition.

Jonh Gurthrie (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience & school. Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press.

Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal, 78 (3), 285-299. Canada: Canadian Center of Science and Education.

McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J. & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey, reading research quarterly 30 (4), 934–956.

McKenna, M. C. (2001). Development of reading attitudes, in L. Verhoeven & C.E. Snow (eds.), Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups, pp. 135–158, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahweh, N.J.

Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning. The modern language journal, 80 (4), 478-493.

Qin Xiaoquing (2002). The relationship between motivation and achievement – A study of motivation of English major. China: Quingdao Agricultural University.

Robert Mazano (2004). The importance of background knowledge. Washington, DC: The national center for education statistics.

Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading. Final report.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1997). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schmit, N., Schmit, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sinatra, G. M., Brown, K. E., & Reynolds, R. E. (2002). Implications of cognitive resource allocation for comprehension strategies instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.

Tarchi, C. (2009). Reading comprehension of informative texts in secondary school: A focus on direct and indirect effects of reader’s prior knowledge. Learning and individual differences.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.

Van den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. (2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment: Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School psychology review.

Yolanda Fontanez-Coleman (2007). Reading strategies for vocabulary development. Tennessee: Learning Express. LLC.

Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i3.3590


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2022. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).