Anh Lan Pham


This paper examines the impact of indirect feedback on learners’ grammatical errors in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing classes. It also considers students’ attitudes towards indirect feedback. Fifty-six eleventh-grade students and one teacher-researcher participated in this empirical study. Three instruments used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data were pretest, posttest and delayed test on English writing as well as a questionnaire and individual interview on students’ attitudes towards indirect feedback. The results showed that the students in the experimental condition committed many fewer grammatical errors than their counterparts in the control group when errors were treated as a single group. The results also indicated that indirect feedback helped reduce more error categories and more errors in each category, especially those related to the simple past tense. Moreover, the participants in the experimental group had positive attitudes toward indirect feedback. These findings support the claim that indirect feedback may help reduce grammatical errors in student writing.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


indirect feedback, grammatical errors, attitudes, error categories, writing

Full Text:



Al Harrasi, S. N. M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback in Improving the Grammatical Accuracy of Omani EFL Learners. PhD Thesis: University of Stirling, UK.

Alsami, E. & Tabrizi, A. R. N. (2016). The Effects of Direct vs. Indirect Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(1), 74-85.

Ahmadian, M., Mehri, E. & Ghaslani, R. (2019). The Effect of Direct, Indirect, and Negotiated Feedback on the Linguistic Accuracy of EFL Learners in Writing. Issue in Language Teaching, 8(1), 1-32.

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chandler, J. (2003). The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improving in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.

Delgado, R. (2006). Effects of different error feedback: Approaches in students’ ability to self-edit their writing. Divergences: Journal of Linguistic and Literary Studies, 2, 2-16.

Duong, T. H. O. (2001). Learner Autonomy in an Asian Context: Independent Learning and Independent Work at the University Level (Viet Nam). Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.

Duong, T. H. O. & Nguyen, T. H. (2006). Memorization on EFL Student’s Strategies at University Level in Vietnam. TESL-EJ, 10(2), 1-21.

Ellis, R. (1991). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. Sheen, Y. Murakami, M. and Takashima, H. (2008). The Effect of Focused and Unfocused Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context System, 36, 353-371.

Erel, O. S. (2007). Error treatment in L2 writing: A comparative study of direct and indirect coded feedback in Turkish EFL context. Journal of the Institute of Social Science, 22, 397-415.

Ezzahouani, Z. (2018). The Effects of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Students’ Accuracy, Munich, GRIN Verlag,

Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-11.

Ferris, D. & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and Practice. Mahwash, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.

Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184.

Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. Modern Language Journal, 79. 329-344.

Greenslade, Terri A. and J. César Félix-Brasdefer (2006). Error Correction and Learner Perception in L2 Spanish Writing. In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, ed. Carol A. Klee and Timothy L. Face, 185-194. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically, correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-53.

Hoang, V. V. (2007). Hướng dẫn thực hiện chương trình sách giáo khoa 11 môn Tiếng Anh. Nhà xuất bản Giáo Dục. (Guidelines to carry out the student book Tieng Anh 11, Giao Duc publisher)

Kaweera, C. (2008). The impact of different types of teachers written feedback on EFL University students’ writing. KKU Res J (GS), 8(2), 83-94.

Kisnanto, Y. P. (2016). The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Higher Education Students’ Writing Accuracy. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 16 (2), 121-131.

Le, V. C. (1999). Language and Vietnamese pedagogical contexts. The fourth International Conference on Language and Development. Retrieved October 24, 2008, from

Le, T. D. T. (2008). An investigation of teaching and learning English among high schools in Cantho. Unpublished MA thesis.

Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: some implications for teaching. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 465-477.

Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285-312.

Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada journal, 22(2), 1-16.

Lim, S. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Writing Instruction: A Meta-Analysis. TESL-EJ, 24(3), 1-26.

Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of error feedback in second language writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 15, 65-79.

Makino, T. Y. (1993). Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. English Language Teaching Journal, 47(4), 337-341.

Mohammad, J. (2015). Role of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback in Improvement of Hindi Students’ Writing Skills. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 11(3), 159-162.

Nguyen, T. H. A. (2005). Evaluation of students’ research work. Danang Publisher.

Nguyen, T. H. T. (2009). Relationship between teacher written feedback and progress of the Vietnamese freshmen in writing: An investigation among the first- year students at Ed, CFL, VNU. Retrieved from and-progress-of-the-freshmen-in-writing-nguyen-thi-huyen-trang

Rahmawati, S. (2017). Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on EFL Students Writing Skill: A Case Study in Junior High School in Bandung. Journal of English and Education, 5(1), 64-71.

Setyorini, E. W. (2015). Students’ Attitudes toward Teacher’s Indirect Written Feedback in Expository and Argumentative Writing Course. Undergraduate Thesis: Satya Wacana Christian University – Salatiga.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283.

Suh, B. (2014). The Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect Coded Written Feedback in English as a Foreign Language. Language Research, 50.3, 795-814.

Truong, K. T. (2004). The facilitation of direct and indirect feedback on EFL writing. Unpublished project. Cantho University.

Tan, K. E. & Manochphiyo, A. (2017). Improving Grammatical Accuracy in Thai Learners’ Writing: Comparing Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14 (3), 430-442.

Tsui, A. (1995). Introducing classroom interaction. Centre for Applied Linguistics, USA. Penguin English.

Valizadeh, M. (2020). The Effect of Comprehensive Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Written Syntactic Accuracy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(1), 17-26.

Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Students’ Perceptions. Íkala, 22(1), 17-32.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).