Qiang Huang


The present study aims to investigate teacher roles in relation to classroom activities. For this purpose, Survey questionnaires were administered to 49 university students in their English course. The questionnaire consisted of two 5-Likert scales. One scale, the STRI, examined teacher roles and the second one, CAI, investigated the number of classroom activities used in class as well as their frequencies. Statistical results showed that both scales were very reliable and valid with Cronbach Alpha values reaching .913 and .822 respectively. So are the three main constructs of both teacher roles (namely, cognitive role, affective role and managerial role) and classroom activities (i.e., one-way language exercises, meaning-focused interactive activities and real-life tasks). Descriptive statistics indicated that the English class was mainly dominated by interactive activities. Further analyses revealed that, in this activity-dominated English course, the teacher had exerted different impacts in the three domains: cognitive role had the highest mean, affective role had the medium mean and managerial role had the lowest mean. More importantly, results of correlational analyses disclosed that teacher role was positively correlated with classroom activities, so did most of their main constructs. More specific features were identified, and implications were discussed in the study. 


Article visualizations:

Hit counter


teacher roles, classroom activities, cognitive role, affective role, managerial role

Full Text:



Admiral, W., Buijs, M., Claessens, W., Honing, T. & Karkdijk, J. (2017). Linking theory and practice: teacher research in history and geography classrooms. Educational Action Research. 25:2, 316-331.

Alvarez, I., Guasch, T., & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environment: A theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 321–336.

Airasian, P. W., & Gay, L. R. (2003). Educational research competencies analysis and application (7th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall.

Andon, N. & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun a son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3): 286-310.

Babbie, Earl R. (2010). The Practice of Social Research. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.

Badia, A., Garcia, C., & Meneses, J. (2017). Approaches to teaching online: Exploring factors influencing teachers in a fully online university. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1193–1207.

Bawane, J., & Spector, J. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383–397.

Branden, K. V. D. (2009). Mediating between predetermined order and chaos: the role of the teacher in task-based language education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 264-285.

Bygate, M. Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (2001). Research pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow, England: Pearson Education. pp. 1-20.

Compton, L. K. L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73–99.

Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical Roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169–189.

Collins, L. & Muoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (Supplementary 2016), 133-147.

Dewaele, J. M., Witney, J. Saito, K. & Dewaele, L. (2017). Foreign Language Enjoyment and Anxiety: the effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, doi:10.1177/1362168817692161.

Dikkers, A. G. (2015). The intersection of online and face-to-face teaching: Implications for virtual school teacher practice and professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 139–156.

Donnelly, R. (2013). The role of PBL tutor within blended academic development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 133–143.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3): 221-246.

Eline, S. L. et al (2019). Oral Interaction in the EFL Classroom: the effects of instructional focus and task type on learner affect. The Modern Language Journal, 103 (1), 308-326.

Fareh, S. (2018). Teacher characteristics and teacher role. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Wiley and TESOL Press. Doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0215.

Guasch, T., Alvarez, L, & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199-206.

Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. S. (2002). Metaphorical conceptualizations of ESL teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 6, 2: 95-120.

Guzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present, and future of blended learning: an in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603.

Huang, Q. (2017a). A study on the roles of teachers in CLT classrooms by metaphor analysis. Canadian Social Science, 13(6). 62-71.

Huang, Q. (2017b). Development of an instrument to explore teacher roles based on perceptions of English learners in online learning context. Cross-Cultural Communication, 13(5), 1–13.

Huang, Q. (2019). Comparing teacher’s roles of f2f learning and online learning in a blended English course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32 (3), 190-209.

Huang, Q. (2020). A comparative study on teacher roles of English course and computer science course. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5 (2), 134-155.

Heift, T. & Rimrott, A. (2012). Task-related variation in computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 96 (4), 525-543.

Jackson, D. O. & Burch, A. R. (2017). Complementary theoretical perspectives on task-based classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 51 (3), 493-506.

Jacobs, G. M. & Farrell, S. C. (2003). Understanding and implementing the CLT paradigm. RELC Journal. 34:5, 6-32.

Jin, Y. & Zhang, L. J. (2018). The dimensions of foreign language classroom enjoyment and their effect on foreign language achievement. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, DOI: 10.1080/13670050. 2018. 1526253.

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education. 5(34), 1-20.

Kilinc, A., Kelly, T., Eroglu, B., Demiral, U., Kartal, T., Sonmez, A. & Demirbag, M. (2017). Stickers to facts, imposers, democracy, advocators, and committed impartialists: preservice science teachers’ beliefs about teacher’s roles in socioscientific discourses. Int J of Sci and Math Educ. 15:195-213.

Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2015). University Student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language learning. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1016441

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAS. Front Pschol. 4, 863-883.

Lee, D. Y. (2011). Korean and foreign students’ perceptions of the teacher’s role in a multicultural online learning environment in Korea. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(6), 913–935.

Li, X. (2002). Communicative English for Chinese Learners. Shanghai, Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Mak, S. H. (2011). Tensions between conflicting beliefs of an EFL Teacher in Teaching Practice. RELC Journal, 42:53-66.

Maulana, R., Helms_lorenz, M. & de Grift, W. V. (2017). Validating a model of effective teaching behavior of pre-service teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 23: 4, 471-493.

Newman, W. I., (2003). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston Allyn & Bacon.

Newman, R. M. C. (2017). Engaging talk: one teacher’s scaffolding of collaborative talk. Language and Education, 31(2), 130-151.

Putwain, D. W. et al (2018). Reciprocal relations between students, academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time. Learning and Instruction, 54, 73-81.

Pyun, D. O. (2013). Attitudes toward task-based language leaning: a study of college Korean Language Learners. Foreign Language Annals, 46 (1), 108-121.

Ross, A. S. & Stracke, E. (2016). Learner perceptions and experiences of pride in second language education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39 (3), 272-291.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stapleton, P. & Shao, Q. (2017). Research in language teaching over two decades: a retrospective of the first 2- volumes of language teaching research. Language Teaching Research, 22 (3), 350-369.

Swan, M. (2005). Legislating by hypothesis: the case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26: 376-401.

Yang, X. & Tao, X. (2018). Comparing discourse behaviors of a high-rated and a low-rated Chinese EFL teacher: a systemic functional perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 102 (3), 594-610.

Varvel, V. (2007). Master online teacher competencies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 10(1).

Wan, W., Low, G. D. & Li, Miao. (2011). From students’ and teachers’ perspectives: metaphors analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers’ roles. System, 39: 403-415.

Wu, M. L. (2012). Statistical analysis of questionnaire: SPSS operation and application. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press.

Zhan, S. X. & Yang, L. H. (2015). An exploration of qualities of proficient university EFL teachers in the eyes of students. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 36, 42-48.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i6.3988


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2022. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).