UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS: TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES IN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS

Suong Ngoc Thi Lu, Huan Buu Nguyen

Abstract


Research into critical thinking has witnessed its role in students’ foreign language learning, including English. Of components contributing to students’ critical thinking development, teachers are the ones who engage students in thinking about or making judgment of what they are doing in their learning process. As critical thinking and language skills are known as intertwined, argumentative essays allow students to reflect on their own writing. However, research on teachers’ perceptions and practices of the interplay between students’ critical thinking and argumentative essays is still meagre. This paper, therefore, examines this area of interest. Data collected in this study include a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Participants were 85 teachers at a university in the Mekong delta, and six participated in the interview process. The findings reveal that teachers’ perceptions of students’ critical thinking regarding interpreting, analysing, inferencing, evaluating and self-regulating were at a high level. Debates and group discussions were the two activities teachers used most in writing classes. Recommendations from this study may offer some pedagogical implications for  the implementation of critical thinking to hone students’ argumentative essay writing.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


critical thinking skills, teachers’ perceptions, argumentative essay writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Boom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Black, S., & Ellis, R. (2010). Evaluating the level of critical thinking in introductory investments courses. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14 (4), 99-106.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Michigan: Longman.

Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to Language. New York: Longman

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, New York: Pearson Education.

Bunting, S. M. (1998). The concept of perceptions in selected nursing theories. Nursing Science Quarterly. 1(4). 168-174.

Chang, Y., Li, B.D., Chen, H.C., & Chiu, F-C. (2015). Investigating the synergy of critical thinking and creative thinking in the course of integrated activity in Taiwan. Educational Psychology, 35 (3), 341-360.

Dewey, J. D. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath and Company.

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2&3), 165-182.

Facione, P. A. (1990). The California critical thinking skills Test-college level. Technical report #2. Factors predictive of CT skills. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.

Fahim, M., & Eslamdoost, S. (2014). Critical thinking: Frameworks and models for teaching. English Language Teaching 7 (7), 141-151

Flynn, T., & King, M. (1993). Dynamics of the writing conference: Social and cognitive interaction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Fraenkel, J. E., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities.

Liang, T.W., & Fung, D. (2020). Fostering critical thinking in English as a second language classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39(2), 1-36

Halpern, D. F, (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training and metacognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 53(4), 449-455

Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69-74.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. England: Longman

Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66-78.

Le, K.T., & Nguyen, H.B. (2017). Teacher beliefs about critical reading strategies in English as a foreign language classes in the Mekong Delta institutions, Vietnam. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(4), 39-57.

Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-525.

Michener, H. A., Delamater, J. D., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Social psychology (5th Ed.). Australia: Thompson and Wadworth.

Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL Students’ perceptions of the effectiveness in peer response group. Journal of second language writing, 7(2), 113-131.

Nguyen, T. S. & Nguyen, H. B. (2020). Unravelling Vietnamese students' critical thinking and its relationship with argumentative writing, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5972 - 5985, 2020. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082233

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning, Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies-what every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle.

Pei, Z., Zheng, C., Zhang, M., & Liu, F. (2017). Critical thinking and argumentative writing: Inspecting the association among EFL learners in China. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p31

Wei, G.W. (2012). The use of wiki to facilitate critical thinking. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, 766-771




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i4.4417

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).