MANAGING CHANGE TO UPGRADE ENGLISH TEACHING IN VIETNAM

Hai-Ha Thi Nguyen

Abstract


Managing change in English Language Teaching (ELT) has been implemented to meet the changing requirements and expectations of language learners in a globalized society. This paper investigates the application of change management models in the field of ELT, with particular emphasis on Vietnam. The research employed a document analysis approach by reviewing and analyzing relevant academic papers on change management and managing change in ELT. The study identified five change management models, including Lewin's Change Management Model, ADKAR Model, Kotter's 8 Step Change Model, McKinsey 7S Model, and Kübler-Ross Five Stage Model. Many of these models have been employed in the ELT sector. The best practice of applying change management models in EFL is recommended to Vietnam in order to improve English teaching in its institutions and centers. The paper is expected to provide an in-depth analysis of various change management models and their potential application in the Vietnamese context.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


change management, English Language Teaching (ELT), Vietnamese education, teaching methodologies, technology integration, curriculum shifts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burnes, B. (2004). Managing change: A strategic approach to organisational dynamics. Pearson Education.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

Heath, C. (2023). What is purposive sampling? https://dovetail.com/research/purposive-sampling/

Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Prosci Learning Center Publications.

Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge University Press.

Indeed Editorial Team. (2023). Document analysis guide: Definition and how to perform it. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/document-analysis

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.

Kotter, J. P., & Cohen, D. S. (2002). The heart of change: Real-life stories of how people change their organizations. Harvard Business School Press.

Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.

Le, X. M., & Le, T. T. (2022). English language teaching pedagogical reforms in Vietnam: External factors in light of teachers’ backgrounds. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2087457

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. In D. Cartwright (Eds.), Field theory in social science (pp. 188-237). Harper & Row.

Nguyen, A. T., & Nguyen, T. N. L. (2021). Vietnamese EFL pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the quality of a training course on English Language Teacher Education. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 13(3), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2021.038

Pham, H. H. (2016). Issues to consider for improving communicative competence for Vietnamese learners. English Language Teaching, 9(12), 89-96.

Phuong, H. Y., & Tran, T. T. Q. (2022). English teaching reform in Vietnam: Responses of non-English majored students toward the target English level of the cefr-V. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 1189–1204. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/4373/1284

Richards, J. C. (2018). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 49(1), 5-22.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Tribble, C. (2012). Managing change in English language teaching: Lessons from experience. British Council.

Tuyen, L. Van, & Hien, T. D. (2022). Factors affecting English language teaching in Vietnamese high schools from teachers’ perspective. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(1), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.71.44

Vo, H., & Nguyen, H. (2016). Critical factors in the adoption of digital English language learning: A case study in a Vietnamese university. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 1-18.

Vu, H. H., & Nguyen, N. U. (2020). Classroom management techniques for teaching English inclusively to ADHD and ADS primary students in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(3), 53–69.

Vu, T. T. N. (2017). The Vietnamese agenda of adopting English as a medium of instruction. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 33(3), 53–65.

Waterman Jr., R. H., Peters, T. J., & Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 23(3), 14-26.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v8i3.4874

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).