TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING: A STUDY OF ENGLISH TUTORS IN COLLEGES OF EDUCATION, GHANA
Abstract
Understanding and addressing teachers' perceptions are essential steps in promoting effective implementation of modern language teaching methodologies. While research on CLT practices and its associated challenges and perceptions is widespread among EFL communities, such studies are missing among ESL language teacher educators preparing the practising teachers to propel the pedagogy effectively. It is unclear in the ESL context whether the English language teacher educators can effectively employ the pedagogy to train their student-teachers to drive home new language teaching approaches such as CLT. In this study, I examined the perception that teacher educators hold about CLT in six thematic areas, using Eagly and Chaiken’s (1998) ABC Model of Attitude as analytical framework to measure teacher beliefs of CLT principles. A convergent parallel-mixed methods design was employed with questionnaire and focus group interview as research tools. The study found out, on a 7-point rater scale, that CELTs’ perception of communicative language teaching in the colleges of education is positive in five thematic areas: CLT as student-centered learning (6.372); teachers’ knowledge on CLT principles (6.068); CLT as integrated skills pedagogy (5.314); CLT as collaborative learning (5.307) and CLT being authentic and functional language use (4.498). In spite of this positive perception, the teachers hold the belief that assessment strategies in the college classroom are not aligned with CLT principles (2.407). The teachers also believe that CLT applicability in CoE classroom to achieve the literacy standard-based curriculum goals is threatened by tutors’ loyalty to product-based approach to language teaching. The study made some recommendations to enhance CLT applicability in the teacher training institutions.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abahussain, M. O. (2016). Implementing communicative language teaching method in Saudi Arabia: Challenges faced by formative year teachers in state schools. Doctoral thesis submitted to the School of Education, University of Stirling
Ariatna. (2016). The need for maintaining CLT in Indonesia. TESOL Journal, 7(4), 800-822.
Aslam, S., Saleem, A., Akram, H., & Hali, A. U. (2020). Student Teachers' Achievements in English Language Learning: An Assessment of a Distance Teacher Education Program in Pakistan. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6770-6777.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (Vol. 88). Oxford University Press.
Bergman, M. M. (2008). Advances in Mixed Methods Research. London: SAGE.
Binti-Rusbadrol, N., Mahmud, N., & Arif, L. S. M. (2015). Association between personality traits and job performance among secondary school teachers. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 1(2), 1-6.
Bowers, B., Nolet, K., Roberts, T. and Esmond, S. (2007). Implementing Change in Long-Term Care: A practical guide to transformation. New York City, NY: Commonwealth Fund
Brandl, K. (2008). Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work, Theory and Practice in Second Language Classroom Instruction Series. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Brown, H. D. (2014). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New Jersey. Prentice Hall.
Brown, J. K. (2008). Student-centered instruction: Involving students in their own education. Music educators journal, 94(5), 30-35.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Christopher, D. (2012). The Routledge International Handbook of Teacher and School Development. Routledge.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842
Curtis, A. (2017). Methods and methodologies for language teaching. Basingstoke, U.K: Macmillan.
Decoo, Decoo, W. (2011). Systemization in foreign language teaching: Monitoring content progression. New York, NY: Routledge.
Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (3d Edition). McGraw Hill: Open University Press.
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian modern language review, 61(3), 325-353.
Gorsuch, G. (2001). EFL educational policies and educational cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities. TESOL Quarterly, 34, pp.675-710.
Griffiths, C. (2014). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters Vol. 67. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.21832/9781783099757/html?lang=en
Heng, L. T. (2021). Communicative language teaching in teaching esl for university students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(6), 49-57.
Hiep, P. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal, v61 n3 p193-201 2007
Hymes, D.H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293
Hymes, D. (2005). Models of the interaction of language and social life: toward a descriptive theory. Intercultural discourse and communication: The essential readings, 4-16.
Jacob, Filgona., John, Sakiyo, & Gwany, D. M. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and students’ academic achievement: A theoretical overview. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 14(2), 14-44.
Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. (2003). Understanding and implementing the CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) paradigm. RELC journal, 34(1), 5-30.
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
Ko, C. (2014). An investigation of the communicative approach teaching in primary English textbooks in Hong Kong and Malaysia: A search into communicative language teaching (CLT) textbooks, and how CLT is applied in textbooks. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2(1), 63-74.
König, J., & Pflanzl, B. (2016). Is teacher knowledge associated with performance? On the relationship between teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge and instructional quality. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 419-436.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post method. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford, OUP
Lee, J., and VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Li, S., Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Limon, İ., & Nartgün, Ş. S. (2020). Development of teacher job performance scale and determining teachers' job performance level. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 13(3), 564-590.
Linnell, J. (2001). Chinese as a second/foreign language teaching and research: Changing classroom contexts and teacher choices. Language Teaching Research, 54-81.
Littlewood, W. (2011). Communicative language teaching: An expanding concept for a changing world. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 541-557). Routledge.
Lochland, P. W. (2012). Situated Pedagogy for Japanese EFL learners: Implications for Australian EAP context. Retrieved from https://figshare.com/articles/conference_contribution/Situated_Pedagogy_for_Japanese_EFL_learners_Implications_for_Australian_EAP_context/20916064/1
Merriam, S. M. (2001). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nunan, D. (2002). Learner strategy training in the classroom: An action research study in Richards and Renandya pp 133-143.
Ozsevik, Z. (2010). The use of communicative language teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL teachers' perceived difficulties in implementing CLT in Turkey (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
Rezaee, A., & Sarani, A. (2018). Job performance of Iranian English teachers: Do teaching experience and gender make a difference?. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 13-22.
Richards, J. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. (2016). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Richards, J. C., and Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Practical understandings. The Modern Language Journal, 83(4), 494-517.
Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. In S. J. Savignon (Ed.). Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Savignon, S. J. (2005). Communicative language teaching: strategies and goals. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 635–651). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. International handbook of English language teaching, 271-288.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97(1), 97-114.
Taguchi, N. (2008). Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study‐abroad context. Language learning, 58(1), 33-71.
Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Gess-Newsome, J., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963.
Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori A. (2010) Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Vongxay, H. (2013). The implementation of communicative language teaching (CLT) in an English department in a Lao higher educational institution: A case study (Master's thesis).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Wang, Q. (2013). The National Curriculum changes and their effects on English language teaching in the People’s Republic of China. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 87-105). Boston, MA: Springer Science & Business Media. Online access via SpringerLink.
Wei, R. C.; Darling-Hammond, L.; Andree, A.; Richardson, N. and Orphanos, S. (2011). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad, Oxford, National Staff Development Council.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i1.5352
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.
All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
