THE EFFECT OF CONSTRUCTIVIST INSTRUCTIONAL APPROACH ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE WRITING SKILLS IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN KENYA

Philip Kwambai Cheruiyot, Anne Syomwene, Khaemba Ongeti

Abstract


The ability to communicate in writing, as indicated in the Kenya Certificate of Primary Education, has consistently been low. This implies that the learning outcomes have not been realized. The pedagogical approach contributes to improving pupils' writing skills. There are several instructional approaches to teaching writing, including communicative language teaching, inquiry-based learning, constructivist approaches, and product-based approaches. However, there have been few investigations to establish the effect of the constructivist approach on learners’ writing skills. This study, therefore, sought to examine the effect of the constructivist approach on enhancing the pupils’ writing abilities in selected primary schools, guided by the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in pupils’ performance in a writing test before and after instruction using the constructive approach. The research employed Vygotsky's social-cultural development theory, which asserts that learners actively generate knowledge and meaning through their personal and societal interactions. The investigation was executed in four counties of Kenya, namely Elgeyo Marakwet, Uasin Gishu, Nandi, and Trans Nzoia. The target population included fourth-grade pupils and their teachers of English. Purposive sampling was used to select four English teachers and 226 fourth-grade pupils from the chosen schools. Simple random sampling was used to pick grade four pupils who participated in the writing achievement test and were thereafter randomly assigned to one of the four groups. The study used a quantitative approach, employing a quasi-experimental design with Solomon's four-group design, anchored on the post-positivist philosophical paradigm. Data were collected via a writing achievement test, which was then analysed using descriptive statistics: frequencies and percentages. In addition, inferential statistics, specifically t-test and ANOVA, were employed to evaluate the hypothesis with a significance level (α) set at 0.05. The findings were communicated through narration, tables, and figures. The post-test group, which was exposed to the constructivist approach, had higher performance compared to the pretest groups. The study concluded that using a constructive approach in teaching writing skills is beneficial to fourth-grade learners. It is recommended that curriculum designers and teachers bolster the incorporation of the constructive approach into writing skills. This study aims to improve the existing literature on writing skills instruction by identifying a more efficient teaching approach for developing writing abilities in fourth-grade pupils in primary schools.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


constructivist approach, writing skills, instructional theories, grade four, Solomon-four group design, primary school

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Ghazo, A. & Al-Zoubi, S. M. (2018). How to develop writing skills through constructivist design model. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 9, No. 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v9n5a11

Argyropoulou, T., & – Nina Zafiri, M. (2021, April 28). Improving the Writing Skills of EFL High School Learners through Alternative Methods of Assessment and Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of English Language Education, 9(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v9i1.18572

Ary, D, Jacobs, L., Razavich, A. & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning Retrieved from https://books.google.it/books/about/Introduction_to_Research_in_Education.html?hl=id&id=FqF7n0zGJm0C&redir_esc=y

Dockrell, J. E. & Papoulidi, A. (2022). Teacher Practices for Teaching Writing in Greek Primary Schools. Reading and writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol 35 Pp1599-1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10199-0

Babbie, E. (2013). The basics of social research. Independence, KY: Thomson Wadsworth. Retrieved from https://www.cengage.uk/c/the-basics-of-social-research-7e-babbie/9781305503076PF/

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist. 28(2): 117-148. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Bello, T. (1997b). Writing topics for adult ESL students. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language Convention, Orlando, FL, USA

Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Writing it up. Boston, Pearson Education Inc. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED419813

Brook, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from https://ocw.metu.edu.tr/pluginfile.php/9173/mod_resource/content/1/In%20Search%20of%20Understanding.pdf

Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://gustavorubinoernesto.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/H-Douglas-Brown-Principles-of-Language-Learning-and-Teaching.pdf

Burke, J. and Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/educational-research/book259335

Calkins, L. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.heinemann.com/products/08809.aspx

Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206

Clements, D. H. (1997). (Mis?)constructing constructivism. Teaching Children Mathematics 4(4) 198-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/TCM.4.4.0198

Cooper, M. M. (1986). The Ecology of Writing. College English, Vol. 48, No. 4 (Apr., 1986), pp. 364-375 Published by: National Council of Teachers of English Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/377264

Cooper, T. C. (1977). A strategy for teaching writing. University of Georgia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1977.tb04790.x

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Duran, L., and Duran E. (2004). The 5E Instructional Model: A Learning Cycle Approach for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching. The Science Education Review, v3 n2 p49–58 (2004): ED.gov. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058007.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2023.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication, 32(4), 365-387. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Gagnon, G. W., & Collay, M. (2006). Designing for learning: Six elements in constructivist classrooms. Corwin Press. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED451136

Glasersfeld, V. E. (1983). Paper presented at the North American Group for Psychology and Mathematics Education meeting, Montreal, September, 1983.

Graham, S. (2019). Changing How Writing Is Taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277-303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125

Hodges, T. S. (2017). Theoretically speaking: An examination of four theories and how they support writing in the classroom. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 90(4): 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2017.1326228

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and educational psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Hoover, W. A. (1996). The practice implications of constructivism. SED Letter 9(3). Retrieved from https://sedl.org/pubs/sedletter/v09n03/practice.html

Hyland, K. (2015). Teaching and researching writing. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Teaching-and-Researching-Writing/Hyland/p/book/9781032056197

Jonassen, D. (1998). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Theories and Models (pp. 215–236). Mahwah, Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Instructional-Design-Theories-and-Models-An-Overview-of-Their-Current-Status/Reigeluth/p/book/9780898592757

Kalemesi, J. P. (2016). The Role of Pictures in Teaching English Composition Writing in Upper Primary School in Emuhaya Sub-County, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Kenyatta University, Kenya. Retrieved from https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/items/50d645c6-67c5-4ca3-8c95-32b9f543f9e7

Katja S., Jakob S., Julia, M. & Tina H. (2024). The role of teacher–student relationships and student–student relationships for secondary school students’ well-being in Switzerland. International Journal of Educational Research Open 6(1):1-12 Volume 6, pp 100318, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100318

Kembo-Sure, E. & Ogechi, N.O. (2009). Linguistic human rights and language policy in the Kenyan education system, Ossrea. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2011.625038

Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (2017). Basic education curriculum framework. Retrieved from https://www.kicd.ac.ke/images/downloads/CURRICULUMFRAMEWOR K.pdf

Kenya National Examinations Council (2021) in http://atikaschool.org & http://elimuspace.co.ke

Koross, B.T., Indoshi, F.C. & Okwach, T. (2013). Perception of teachers and students towards methods used in teaching and learning of English writing skills in secondary schools. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 1(1), 32-38. Retrieved from https://eajournals.org/ijellr/vol-1-issue-1-june-2013/perception-of-teachers-and-students-towards-methods-used-in-teaching-and-learning-of-english-writing-skills-in-secondary-schools/

Little-wood, B. (2014). Assignment Writing Service, Trusted, Reliable and Secure. Nottingham: All Answers Ltd.

Koul, L. (1984). Methodology of educational research. Vikas Publishing House. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Methodology_of_Educational_Research_5th.html?id=2B7zDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a post-method pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4). pp.537-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588427

Krest, M. (1987). Time on my hands: Handling the paper load. English Journal, 76(8) December 1987, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/819412

Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. 300 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Critical thinking and constructivism techniques for improving student achievement. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 21(3), 1-9. Retrieved from http://nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg,%20Fred%20C.%20Critical%20Thinking%20%26%20Constructivism%20V21%20N3%202011%20NFTJ.pdf

Malik, A. G.; SartaJ, F. J. & Choudhary Z. J. (2013). Constructive feedback: An effective constituent for eradicating impediments in writing skills. Canadian Center of Science and Education. English Language Teaching; Vol. 6, No. 8. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n8p21

McDonough, J.; Shaw, C.; Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-sg/Materials+and+Methods+in+ELT%3A+A+Teacher's+Guide%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781444336924

McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Essex: Pearson. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED577250

Milad, M. (2017). Blended learning approach: Integrating reading and writing research skills to improve academic writing. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 3 No. 3 October, 23-55

Mugenda, O. M. and Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research Methods, Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. ACT, Nairobi. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Research_Methods.html?id=4WyrAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Muitung’u J. & Njeng’ere D. (2010). Mastering PTE English, Oxford University Press. Nairobi. Retrieved from https://textbookcentre.com/shop/mastering-pte-english/

National Writing Project, & Nagin, C. (2006). Because writing matters: Improving student writing in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Because_Writing_Matters.html?id=EUgapyriSLgC&redir_esc=y

Neo, M. (2007). Learning with Multimedia: Engaging Students in Constructivist Learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(2), 149-158

Nikolopoulou, K. (2023, June 22). What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 6, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/

Nunan, D. (Ed.). (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Practical_English_Language_Teaching.html?id=v1DMAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Onchera, P. & Manyasi, B. (1991). Functional Writing Skills for Effective Communication: The English Language Classroom in Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS) 4(6): 842-847. Retrieved from https://www.scholarlinkinstitute.org/jeteraps/articles/Functional%20Writing%20Skills.pdf

Ogunniyi, M. B. (1992). Understanding research in social science. Ibadan: University Press.

Okari, F. M. (2016). The Writing Skill in the Contemporary Society: The Kenyan Perspective. Journal of Education and Practice Vol. 7, No. 35. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1126424.pdf

Piaget, J. (1967). The role of action in the development of thinking. In Knowledge and development (pp. 17-42). Springer US. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Role-of-Action-in-the-Development-of-Thinking-Piaget/cb8d93f346dca1f8e42a01f581bd9b0ef466f4fe

Ruiz-Martín, Héctor, and Rodger W. Bybee (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education 9, no. 1 (2022): NA. Gale in Context: Science. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A695675665/SCIC?u=gale&sid=bookmark-SCIC&xid=7861634a. Accessed January 23, 2023.

Shaffer, D. R. & Kipp, K. (2010). Developmental psychology. Belmont, Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Developmental_Psychology_Childhood_Adole.html?id=CuvXxrhk8HUC&redir_esc=y

Smith, K. (1993). Becoming the “guide” on the side. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 35- 37. Retrieved from https://ascd.org/el/articles/becoming-the-guide-on-the-side

Teresa, F. 2009). Handbook of Research on Assessment Technologies, Methods, and Applications in Higher Education. (University of South Florida, USA). Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/book/handbook-research-assessment-technologies-methods/444. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch008

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://ouleft.org/wp-content/uploads/Vygotsky-Mind-in-Society.pdf

Waran, V. S. (1995). Principles of teaching English. Publishing House PVT LTD. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Principles_Of_Teaching_English.html?id=Trd0dvUUlJwC&redir_esc=y

Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing 13(1):29–48. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004

Zulela M. S. and Reza Rachmadtullah (2019). Constructivism Approach in Learning to Write Narrative at Elementary School. Pp 87-290. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2018). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.64




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i6.5751

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).