SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL SCAFFOLDING IN ENGLISH READING COMPREHENSION OF IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS

Somayeh Khajeh Khosravi

Abstract


This study seeks to investigate the impact of symmetrical (S) and asymmetrical (AS) scaffolding, which are two types of scaffolding, on advance students' reading comprehension. Forty advance Iranian EFL learners participated in this study. The participants were both male and female students with an average age of 21 with almost the same educational facilities and physical conditions in the academic year 2015-2016. They were randomly divided into control and experimental groups. Each group had 20 students. Classes were taught by two different teachers. Each of the teachers has two classes (one symmetrical and one asymmetrical). After administering a Pre-test, they were divided into two experimental groups. The experimental group (A) received instruction according to S strategy whereas the experimental group (B) was instructed via the AS strategy. A Post-test was administered, and its results were analyzed through t-test. The results indicated that although S scaffolding has significant effect on learners' performance in reading comprehension, enhancing it but AS scaffolding is a more effective strategy in improving reading comprehension achievement.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


scaffolding, symmetrical scaffolding, asymmetrical scaffolding, the zone of proximal development

References


Ankrum, J. W., Genest, M. T., & Belcastro, E. G. (2014). The power of verbal scaffolding: “Showing” beginning readers how to use reading strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(1), 39-47.‏

Attarzadeh, M. (2011). The effect of scaffolding on reading comprehension of various text modes on Iranian EFL learners with different proficiency levels. Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 1-28.‏

Ballantyne, K. G., Sanderman, A. R., & Levy, J. (2008). Educating English Language Learners: Building Teacher Capacity. Roundtable Report. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Programs.‏

Bassiri, M. A. (2012). The impact of scaffolding as a strategy for teaching reading on the motivation of Iranian L2 learners. British Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 32-46.‏

Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2010). Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 507-529.‏

Dennen, V. P., & Burner, K. J. (2008). The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3, 425-439.‏

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning.‏

Ghafar Samar, R., & Dehqan, M. (2012). Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(3).‏

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.‏

Haboush, Z. Y. (2010). The Effectiveness of Using a Programme Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory on Eighth Graders’ English Reading Comprehension Skills (Doctoral dissertation, The Islamic University of Gaza).‏

Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education.‏

Jalilvand, M. (2014). The effect of peer and teacher scaffolding on the reading comprehension of EFL learners in asymmetrical and symmetrical groups. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 5(4), 1-17.‏

Magno, C. (2010). The effect of scaffolding on children’s reading speed, reading anxiety, and reading proficiency. TESOL Journal, 3, 92-98.‏

McElvain, C. M. (2010). Transactional literature circles and the reading comprehension of English learners in the mainstream classroom. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 178-205.‏

Poorahmadi, M. (2010). The effect of employing scaffolding strategies and classroom tasks in teaching reading comprehension. The Journal of TEFLL, 1(3),

Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., ... & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The journal of the learning sciences, 13(3), 337-386.‏

Sharpe, T. (2006). ‘Unpacking’scaffolding: Identifying discourse and multimodal strategies that support learning. Language and Education, 20(3), 211-231.‏

Szymańska, A., & Kaczmarek, A. W. (2011). Reading efficiency in blended learning context. Teaching English with technology, 11(2), 29-42.‏

Wilson, F., Carroll, P., & Werno, M. (2014). Not dumbing down but stimulating up: Reading in the reformed GCSE modern foreign languages classroom.‏

Yazdanpanah, M., & Khanmohammad, H. (2014). Sociocultural theory and listening comprehension: does the scaffolding of EFL learners improve their listening comprehension? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2389.‏




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.596

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).