RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLAYER PERFORMANCE AND SALARY IN A PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL LEAGUE
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether teams in Taiwan’s Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) are paying their players fairly and equitably based on their performance. Possible performance criteria of professional baseball players are gathered from past literature before subjecting these criteria to regression analysis to obtain criteria that are significant and their corresponding weights. The TOPSIS method is then used to calculate player performance value, and with Quadrant Analysis, relationship between player performance and salary is analyzed. These were used to project salary adjustment for these players for the coming season. Finally, to determine the fairness of salary adjustments, this study employed McNemar test to examine whether adjustments are made based on player performance. This study has found innings pitched (IP), earned run average (ERA) and walks plus hits per inning pitched (WHIP) to be significant abilities in evaluating performance of pitchers, while for fielders, significant abilities for performance evaluation were batting average (BA), slugging average (SLG), hits (H) and on base percentage (OBP) . Based on these derived performance evaluation criteria, more than half of these players gave above average performance, yet their salary adjustments were not made accordingly nor were they made based on the above-mentioned criteria.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Annala, C. N, & Winfree, J. (2011). Salary distribution and team performance in Major League Baseball. Sport Management Review, 14, 167-175.
Berri, D. J., Brook, S. L., & Schmidt, M. B. (2007). Does one need to score to score? International Journal of Sports Finance, 2, 190-205.
Bodin, L., & Epstein, E. (2000). Who’s on first-with probability 0.4. Computers & Operations Research, 27, 205-215. doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00002-7
Borghesi, R. (2008). Allocation of scarce resources: Insight form the NFL salary cap. Journal of Economics and Business, 60(6), 536-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2007.08.002
Bryson, A., Buraimo, B., & Simmons, R. (2011). Do salaries improve worker performance? Labour Economics, 18(4), 424-433. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2010.12.005
Chen, C. C., Lin, M. L., Lee, Y. T., & Chen, T. T. (2011). Starting pitchers rotation in Chinese Professional Baseball League based on AHP and TOPSIS. Proceeding of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 58, 74-79.
Chen, C. C., Lee, Y. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2014). Professional Baseball Team Starting Pitcher Selection using AHP and TOPSIS Methods. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14(2), 545-563.
Dey, P. K., Ghosh, D. N., & Mondal, A. C. (2013). Modified group decision algorithm for performance appraisal of Indian premier league cricketers. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 10(10), 325-333.
Hakes, J. K., & Sauer, R. D. (2006). An Economic Evaluation of the Moneyball Hypothesis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(3), 173-185. doi:10.1257/jep.20.3.173
Hakes, J. K., & Sauer, R. D. (2007). The Moneyball Anomaly and Payroll Efficiency: A Further Investigation. International Journal of Sport Finance, 2(4), 177-189. doi:10.1177/1527002510363097
Holmes, P. (2011). New evidence of salary discrimination in major league baseball. Labour Economics, 18(3), 320-331. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2010.11.009
Hwang, C.L. & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making – Methods and Applications. New York: Springer.
Jane, W. J. (2010). Raising salary or redistributing it: A panel analysis of Major League Baseball. Economics letters, 107(2), 297-299. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.016
Jewell, R. T., & Molina, D. J. (2004). Productive Efficiency and Salary Distribution: The Case of US Major League Baseball. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(1), 127-142. doi:10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.05101008.x
Lanoue, M. R., & Revetta, J. J. J. (1993). An analytic hierarchy approach to Major League Baseball offensive performance ratings. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 17(4-5), 195-209. doi:10.1016/0895-7177(93)90188-5
Lewis, M. (2003). Moneyball: The art of winning an unfair game. New York: Norton.
Martins, N. (2014). Determining textbook learning enhancement as perceived by students and lecturers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 57-63. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1139
McCormick, R. E., & Tollison, R. D. (2001). Why do black basketball players work more for less money? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44(2), 201-219. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00156-6
Olson, D. L. (2001). Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict know outcomes. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 576-587. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00416-6
Olson, D. L. (2004). Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(7-8), 721-727. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003
San, G., & Jane, W. J. (2008). Wage dispersion and team performance: evidence form the small size professional league in Taiwan. Applied Economics Letters, 15, 883-886. doi:10.1080/13504850600905014
Shih, H.S. (2015). A Mixed-Data Evaluation in Group TOPSIS with Differentiated Decision Power. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(3), 537-565. doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9451-9
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.1539
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Chih-Cheng Chen, Chih-Jen Chuang, Tian-Shaing Kuo, Wen-Ing Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).