Damla S. Yıldırım Kose, Murat Bilge


This study was conducted to examine the correlation between the scores of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and the scores of the Cardio Fitness Test (CFT) in students studying in the Faculty of Sports Sciences. The sample group was composed of totally 25 students, including 14 males and 11 females aged between 22-24 years. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test battery including seven stations as deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability, and rotary trunk and the Cardio Fitness Test (CFT) battery including six stations as resting heart rate, heart rate recovery, body flexibility, upper body strength, core strength, and lower body strength were applied to the sample group in different days. It was found that there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the total scores of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and the total scores of the Cardio Fitness Test (CFT) (r =0.60, p<0.001). While no statistically significant correlation was found between the lower body total scores of the relevant test batteries, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the upper extremity total scores (r=0.48, p<0.05). Consequently; the significant correlation found between the Functional Movement Screen test battery, used in posture analysis and posture rehabilitation, and the Cardio Fitness Test formed the opinion that these two tests can be used in the field in combination. It may be recommended to apply this correlation in larger groups and assess the gender and age differences.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



physical readiness, posture analysis, prevention

Full Text:



An H. M., Miller C., Mcelveen M., Lynch J. (2012). The effect of kinesio tape on lover extremity functional movement screen scores. International Journal of Exercise Science; 5 (3): 196-204.

Armstrong R., Greig M. (2018). The functional movement screen and modified star excursion balance test as predictors of t-test agility performance in university rugby union and netball players. Cardio Therapy in Sport; 31: 15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.01.003

Beardsley C., Hons B. A., Contreas B. (2014). The Functional Movement Screen: a review. National Strength and Conditioning Association; 36(5): 72-80.

Bodden J. G., Needham R. A., Chockalingham N. (2015). The effect of an intervention program on functional movement screen test scores in mixed martial arts athletes. J Strength Cond Res.; 29(1): 219–225.

Boguszewski D., Adamczyk J. G., Bialoszewski D. (2015). The assessment of movement patterns of children practicing karate using the functional movement screen test. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts; 1(2): 21-26. doi: 10.5604/20815735.1174227

Bonazza N. I. Smuin D., Onks C. A., Silvis M. L., Dhavan A. (2016). Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen. The American Journal of Sports Medicine; 45(3): 725-732. doi: 10.1177/0363546516641937

Bond D., Goodson L., Oxford S. W., Nevill A. M., Duncan M. J. (2015). The association between anthropometric variables, FMS and 100 m Freestyle swimming performance in youth swimmers. Sports; (3): 1-11. doi: 10.3390/sports3010001

Cengizhan O., Eyuboglu E. (2017). The relationship between cardio characteristics and functional movement analysis of athletes of various sports. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies; 3(SI): 365-371.

Chimera N. J., Smith C. A., Warren M. (2015). Injury history, sex, and performance on the functional movement screen and y balance test. Journal of Athletic Training; 50(5): 475-485. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.6.02

Cook G., Burton L., Hoogenboom B. (2006). Pre-participation Screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther.; 1(2): 62–72.

Cook G., Burton L., Kiesel K., Rose G., Bryant M. F. (2010). Movement: functional movement systems: Screening-assessment-corrective strategies. On Target Publications Santa Cruz, California.

Cook G., Burton L., Hoogenboom B. J., Voight M. (2014). Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function- part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther.; 9(3): 396-409.

Dorrel B. S., Long T., Shaffer S., Myer G. D. (2015). Evaluation of the functional movement screen as an injury prediction tool among active adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Athletic Training; 7(6): 532-537. doi: 10.1177/1941738115607445

Fox D., O’Malley E., Blake C. (2014). Normative data for the functional movement screen in male Gaelic field sports. Cardio Therapy in Sport; 15(3): 194-199. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.11.004

Kraus K., Schutz E., Taylor Q., Doyscher R. (2014). Efficiency of the functional movement screen: a review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research; 28(12), 3571-3584.

Lloyd R. S., Oliver J. L., Radnor J. M., Rhodes B. C., Faigenbaum A. D., Myer G. D. (2015). Relationships between functional movement screen scores, maturation and cardio performance in young soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences; 33(1): 11-19. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.918642

Lockie R. G., Schultz A. B., Callaghan S., Jordan C. A., Luczo T. M., Jeffriess M. D. (2015). A preliminary investigation into the relationship between functional movement screen scores and athletic cardio performance in female team sport athletes. Biology of Sport; 32(1): 41-51. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1127281

Loudon J., Parkerson and Mitchell A., Hildebrand L., Teaque C. (2014). Relationship between functional movement screen result and history of cardio problems in high school football players and runners in japan. Functional movement screen scores in a group of running athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research; 28(4): 909-913.

Minthorn L. M., Fayson S. D., Stobierski L. M., Welch C. E., Anderson B. E. (2015). The functional movement screen’s ability to detect changes in movement patterns after a training intervention. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation; 24: 322-326. doi:10.1123/jsr.2013-0146

Okada T., Huxel K. C., Nesser T. W. (2011). Relationship between core stability, functional movement and performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research; 25(1): 252-261. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b22b3e

Scneiders A. G., Davidson A., Horman E., Sullivan S. J. (2011). Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population. The International Journal of Sports Cardio Therapy; 6(2): 75-82.

Thompson K., Alexander B., Bugler F. (2012). The fitness book. Printed and bound by Tien Wah Press, Singapore; 35-39.

Zalai D., Losada P., Horvath P., Kovacs I., Varga P. P., Varszegl J. (2014). Analysis of YO-YO intermittent recovery test, functional movement and body composition in elite-level male professional football players. 19. Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science; 2-5 July, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Zeng N., Liu J., France T., Zou L., Li R. (2016). Relationship between the functional movement screen and motor proficiency. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport; 87(S2).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.2670


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Damla S. Yıldırım Kose, Murat Bilge

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).